Page 64 - IJB-8-2

CFD Assessment of Extrusion Bioprinting Parameters
J Med Eng Technol, 42:187–202. Nanocellulose Bioinks for Cartilage Bioprinting Applications.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2018.1457094 Ann Biomed Eng, 45:210–23.
6. Boularaoui S, Al Hussein G, Khan KA, et al., 2020, An https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5
Overview of Extrusion-based Bioprinting with a Focus 18. Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, et al., 2015, 3D
on Induced Shear Stress and its Effect on Cell Viability. Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-
Bioprinting, 20:e00093. Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering
7. Bahrd A, 2017, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Applications. Biomacromolecules, 16:1489–96.
Quantitative Cell Viability Measurements in Dispensing- 19. Wu Y, Wenger A, Golzar H, et al., 2020, 3D Bioprinting
Based Biofabrication. p. 37. of Bicellular Liver Lobule-mimetic Structures via
8. Gómez-Blanco JC, Mancha-Sánchez E, Marcos AC, et al., Microextrusion of Cellulose Nanocrystal-incorporated Shear-
Bioink Temperature Influence on Shear Stress, Pressure and thinning Bioink. Sci Rep, 10:77146.
Velocity Using Computational Simulation. Processes, 8:865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77146-3
9. Emmermacher J, Spura D, Cziommer J, et al., 2020, 20. Pössl A, 2021, A Targeted Rheological Bioink Development
Engineering Considerations on Extrusion-based Bioprinting: Guideline and its Systematic Correlation with Printing
Interactions of Material Behavior, Mechanical Forces and Behavior. Biofabrication, 13:035021.
Cells in the Printing Needle. Biofabrication, 12:025022. 21. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to Assess
10. Göhl J, Markstedt K, Mark A, et al., 2018, Simulations of 3D Printability of Bioinks for Extrusion-based Bioprinting
Bioprinting: Predicting Bioprintability of Nanofibrillar Inks. and Evaluation of Rheological Properties Governing
Biofabrication, 10:034105. Bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9:044107.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aac872 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
11. Gómez-Blanco JC, Mancha-Sánchez E, Ortega-Morán JF, 22. Webb B, Doyle BJ, 2017, Parameter Optimization for 3D
et al., 2020, Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Bioprinting of Hydrogels. Bioprinting, 8, 8–12.
Inlet Velocity on Extrusion-Based Bioprinting. in XV 23. Talluri DJ, 2021, Numerical Modeling of the Fiber Deposition
Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Flow in Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting. Rowan University,
Engineering and Computing MEDICON 2019. Cham: Ann Arbor. p. 103.
Springer International Publishing. 24. Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al., 2017, Extrusion
12. Reina-Romo E, Mandal S, Amorim P, et al., 2021, Towards Bioprinting of Shear‐Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks.
the Experimentally-Informed In Silico Nozzle Design Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1601451.
Optimization for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting of Shear- https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451
Thinning Hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9:701778. 25. Kraynak J, 2021, Minimizing Cell Death During the Extrusion
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.701778 Bioprinting of Gelatin-Alginate Bioinks. Temple University,
13. Gillispie G, Prim P, Copus J, et al., 2020, Assessment Libraries.
Methodologies for Extrusion-Based Bioink Printability. 26. Anandan A, Courtial EJ, Lemarié L, et al., 2020, Rheology,
Biofabrication, 12:022003. Simulation and Data Analysis toward Bioprinting Cell
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d Viability Awareness. Bioprinting, 21:e00119.
14. Rapp BE, 2016, Fluids, in Microfluidics: Modeling, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00119
Mechanics and Mathematics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 27. Li M, Tian X, Schreyer DJ, et al., 2011, Effect of Needle
Elsevier. p. 250–51. Geometry on Flow Rate and Cell Damage in the Dispensing-
15. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver R, et al., 2014, The 3D based Biofabrication Process. Biotechnol Prog, 27:1777–84.
Printing of Gelatin Methacrylamide Cell-laden Tissue- https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.679
engineered Constructs with High Cell Viability. Biomaterials, 28. Udofia E, Zhou W, 2018, Microextrusion Based 3D Printing
35:49–62. a Review. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 of the 29 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication
th
16. Dharmadasa V, 2016, Investigation of Cell-viability in the Symposium an Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin,
Bioprinting Process. In: Department of Mechanics. Sweden: TX.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology. p. 54. 29. Blaeser A, Campos DF, Puster U, et al., 2016, Controlling
17. Müller M, Öztürk E, Arlov O, et al., 2017, Alginate Sulfate- Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance

56 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2