Page 86 - IJB-8-3
P. 86

Protein Nanoparticles Promote Cell Growth in 3D Bioprinted Constructs
           process and positively influence cell viability suggest that   Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.
           this method can promote the survival of cells within 3D      https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
           printed constructs. Gas vesicles can be used as a bridge   7.   Seol  YJ,  Kang HW, Lee SJ, et al., 2014, Bioprinting
           to promote cell viability between construct formation and   Technology and its Applications. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg,
           vascularization in the future.
                                                                   46:342–8.
           Acknowledgments                                         https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu148

           The  authors thank  Dr.  Thorsten  Allers  for  generously   8.   Li  X, Liu  B, Pei  B, et  al., 2020, Inkjet  Bioprinting  of
           providing us with H. volcanii H1895 and its corresponding   Biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120:10793–833.
           vector pTA963. We thank the research intern, Alvin Huang,      https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
           for  protein  nanoparticle  production  and  purification   9.   Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based
           assistance. The research reported in this publication was   Bioprinting-process,  Bio-inks and  Applications.  Biomater
           supported by funding from King Abdullah University of   Sci, 5:632–47.
           Science and Technology and University of Jeddah.
                                                               10.  Jentsch S, Nasehi R, Kuckelkorn C, et al., 2021, Multiscale
           Conflict of interest                                    3D  Bioprinting  by  Nozzle‐Free Acoustic  Droplet  Ejection.

           The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.  Small Methods, 5:2000971.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202000971
           Author contributions                                11.  Dou C, Perez V, Qu J, et al., 2021, A State‐of‐the‐Art Review

           C.A.E.H. and M.R. conceived,  directed  the study and   of Laser‐Assisted Bioprinting and its Future Research Trends.
           planned the experiments. R.K. designed and constructed   ChemBioEng Rev, 8:517–34.
           the GVNP expression system and performed the GVNP       https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202000037
           characterization  with  D.R. and  S.M. S.A. and  S.G.   12.  Fu Z, Naghieh S, Xu C, et al., 2021, Printability in Extrusion
           performed the biocompatibility  study. Z.K and K.K      Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 13:033001.
           designed the 3D printing system and performed the       https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab
           bioprinting.  S.A. carried  out the SEM and confocal
           imaging. S.A. prepared the manuscript with assistance   13.  Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization-
           from  R.K. and  S.G. All  authors provided  input  on  the   based Bioprinting-process, Materials,  Applications and
           study and experimental design, analysis, and manuscript.  Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
           References                                          14.  Ravnic  DJ,  Leberfinger  AN,  Koduru  SV, et al., 2017,

           1.   Cui H, Nowicki M, Fisher JP, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting for   Transplantation of Bioprinted Tissues and Organs: Technical and
               Organ Regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1601118.   Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives. Ann Surg, 266:48-58.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601118              https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002141
           2.   Khademhosseini A, Langer R, 2016, A decade of Progress in   15.  Hauser CA, Zhang  SG, 2010, Designer  Self-assembling
               Tissue Engineering. Nat Protoc, 11:1775–81.         Peptide  Nanofiber  Biological  Materials.  Chem Soc Rev,
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.123              39:2780–90.
           3.   Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al., 2020, Progress in      https://doi.org/10.1039/b921448h
               3D Bioprinting  Technology for  Tissue/Organ Regenerative   16.  Chen C, Bang S, Cho Y, et al., 2016, Research Trends in
               Engineering. Biomaterials, 226:119536.              Biomimetic  Medical Materials for  Tissue Engineering:  3D
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536  Bioprinting,  Surface  Modification,  Nano/Micro-technology
           4.   Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print me an Organ! Why   and Clinical Aspects in Tissue Engineering of Cartilage and
               we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.    Bone. Biomater Res, 20:10.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0057-3
           5.   Bishop ES, Mostafa  S, Pakvasa  M, et  al., 2017, 3-D   17.  Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Gentile C, et al., 2010, Towards
               Bioprinting  Technologies  in  Tissue Engineering  and   Organ  Printing:  Engineering  an  Intra-organ  Branched
               Regenerative  Medicine:  Current and Future Trends.  Genes   Vascular Tree. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 10:409–20.
               Dis, 4:185–95.                                      https://doi.org/10.1517/14712590903563352
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2017.10.002    18.  Kolesky  DB,  Homan  KA, Skylar-Scott  MA,  et  al.,  2016,
           6.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and   Three-dimensional  Bioprinting  of Thick  Vascularized

           78                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91