Page 113 - IJB-8-4
        P. 113
     Köpf, et al.
           of 3D encapsulated cells needs to be thoroughly assessed   prävaskularisiertem Luftröhren-Ersatzgewebe’ published
           over  time in  a  follow-up  study  that would  consider an   in  2019  at  the  Faculty  of  Georesources  and  Materials
           equal  concentration  of  viable  HUVEC  in  all  samples   Engineering,  RWTH  Aachen  University,  Aachen,
           at  the  beginning  of  the  experiment.  However,  taking   Germany[37].
           into  consideration  the  important  finding  that  3D  pre-
           vascularization can equally be achieved with endothelial   Funding
           cells that were exposed to low shear stress, the pressure   We  acknowledge  the  financial  support  of  Deutsche
           range below 0.5 bar should be the area of main interest in   Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, Bonn, Germany (Grants
           further studies.                                    FI975/23-1+2,  JO  764/4-1+2,  and  363055819/GRK
               Although  bioprinting-associated  shear  stress  can   2415).
           substantially diminish the number of viable cells, the
           results presented in this study indicate that there exists   Conflict of interest
           a process window for microvalve-based bioprinting in
           which  cell  viability  and  function  of  HUVEC  are  not   The authors declare no competing financial interest.
           negatively affected. Due to exposure to the high shear   Author contributions
           stresses that occur by setting the printing pressure to
           3  bar,  a  significant  viability  loss  immediately  after   Conceptualization  –  Marius  Köpf  and  Horst  Fischer;
           printing  as  well  as  reduced  capillary-like  network   Supervision  –  Horst  Fischer  and  Stefan  Jockenhoevel;
           formation in long-term 3D culture experiments can be   Investigation – Marius Köpf with support of Franziska
           observed.                                           Kreimendahl  (experimental),  Ramin  Nasehi  (numerical
                                                               simulations);  Formal  analysis  –  Marius  Köpf,  Ramin
           5. Conclusion                                       Nasehi,  Franziska  Kreimendahl,  Stefan  Jockenhoevel,
           In this work, we used a FEA-based simulation model to   and Horst Fischer; Funding acquisition – Horst Fischer
           determine the mechanical conditions imposed on cells   and Stefan Jockenhoevel; Writing – original draft: Marius
                                                               Köpf with support of Horst Fischer and Ramin Nasehi.
           during bioprinting. The simulation model offers for the
           first time detailed spatiotemporal information about the   References
           printing-induced shear stress and hydrostatic pressure
           that,  together  with  experimental  studies,  can  be  used   1.  Malda J, Visser J, Melchels J, et al., 2013, 25  Anniversary
                                                                                                    th
           for optimizing the process for cell-friendly bioprinting   Article:  Engineering  Hydrogels  for  Biofabrication.  Adv
           with  different  hydrogels.  The  experimental  in vitro   Mater, 25:5011–28.
           cell  culture  analysis  revealed  that  the  cells  maintain   http://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042
           their  capacity  to  proliferate  and  to  assemble  into  2D
           and  3D  multi-cell  capillary  networks  after  exposure   2.  Wang  Z,  Kapadia  W,  Li  C,  et al.,  2021,  Tissue-specific
           to  bioprinting-associated  hydrostatic  pressure  and   Engineering:  3D  Bioprinting  in  Regenerative  Medicine.
           resulting shear stress. However, this is true only if the   J Control Release, 329:237–56.
           key  parameters,  such  as  bioink  viscosity  and  printing   http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.044
           pressure, are properly balanced. We therefore conclude   3.  Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, et al., 2005, Engineering Vascularized
           that microvalve-based bioprinting is a suitable technique   Tissue. Nat Biotechnol, 23:821–3.
           for the manufacture of pre-vascularized constructs when
           the printing parameters and thus the shear stress level   https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0705-821.
           are thoroughly controlled.                          4.  Subbiah  R,  Thrivikraman  G,  Parthiban  SP,  et  al.,  2021,
                                                                   Prevascularized Hydrogels with Mature Vascular Networks
           Acknowledgments                                         Promote  the  Regeneration  of  Critical-size  Calvarial  Bone
           This  work  was  supported  by  the  Core  Facility  Two-  Defects In Vivo. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 15:219–231.
           Photon  Imaging  of  the  Interdisciplinary  Center  for   https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3166
           Clinical Research (IZKF Aachen) within the Faculty of   5.  Zimoch  J,  Zielinska  D,  Michalak-Micka  K,  et al.,  2021,
           Medicine  at  RWTH  Aachen  University.  We  thank  Dr.   Bio-engineering  a  Prevascularized  Human  Tri-layered
           Michael Vogt, operation manager of this Core Facility for   Skin  Substitute  Containing  a  Hypodermis.  Acta  Biomater,
           his support. This publication uses data collected within
           the framework of the PhD thesis of the first author Marius   134:215–27.
           Köpf entitled ‘Synthese sowie rheologische, mechanische   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.033
           und  zellbiologische  Charakterisierung  von  Agarose-  6.  Kreimendahl  F,  Köpf  M,  Thiebes  AL,  et al.,  2017,
           Kollagen-Hydrogel-Mischungen  für  den  3D-Druck  von   Three-dimensional  Printing  and  Angio-genesis:  Tailored
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       105





