Page 220 - IJB-8-4

3D Printed Porous 45S5 Bioceramic
Investigation: Jiabao Gong, Haowei Zhang, Yanting Ni, 11. Ma H, Feng C, Chang J, et al., 2018, 3D-printed Bioceramic
Lijia Cheng Scaffolds: From Bone Tissue Engineering to Tumor Therapy.
Formal analysis: Qiaoyu Song, Lu Tang, Fei Xing Acta Biomater, 79:37–59.
Writing – original draft: Zhihong Dong, Changchun Zhou https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026
Writing – review and editing: Ming Liu, Changchun Zhou
12. Gao C, Yao M, Shuai C, et al., 2020, Advances in Bioceramics
References for Bone Implant Applications. Biodes Manuf, 3:307–30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00087-3
1. Jakus AE, Rutz AL, Shah RN, 2016, Advancing the Field of 13. Amiryaghoubi N, Fathi M, Barzegari A, et al., 2021, Recent
3D Biomaterial Printing. Biomed Mater, 11:014102. Advances in Polymeric Scaffolds Containing Carbon
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/014102 Nanotube and Graphene Oxide for Cartilage and Bone
2. Michael L, Sarah S, Shayne H, et al., 2022, 3D Printing of Regeneration. Mater Today Commun, 26:102097.
Ceramic Biomaterials. Eng Regen, 3:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102097
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2022.01.006 14. Abdal-Hay A, Sheikh FA, Shmroukh AN, et al., 2021,
3. Varma MV, Kandasubramanian B, Ibrahim SM, 2020, 3D Immobilization of Bioactive Glass Ceramics @ 2D and 3D
Printed Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Mater Chem Polyamide Polymer Substrates for Bone Tissue Regeneration.
Phys, 255:123642. Mater Des, 210:110094.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123642 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110094
4. Dabbagh SR, Sarabi MR, Rahbarghazi R, et al., 2021, 15. Zerankeshi MM, Bakhshi R, Alizadeh R, 2022, Polymer/
3D-printed Microneedles in Biomedical Applications. Metal Composite 3D Porous Bone Tissue Engineering
iScience, 24:102012. Scaffolds Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing Techniques:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.102012 A Review. Bioprinting, 25:e00191.
5. Sun H, Zhang C, Zhang B, et al., 2022, 3D Printed Calcium https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00191
Phosphate Scaffolds with Controlled Release of Osteogenic 16. Mirkhalaf M, Wang X, Entezari A, et al., 2021, Redefining
Drugs for Bone Regeneration. Chem Eng J, 427:130961. Architectural Effects in 3D Printed Scaffolds through
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130961 Rational Design for Optimal Bone Tissue Regeneration. Appl
6. Liu X, Chen M, Luo J, et al., 2021, Immunopolarization- Mater Today, 25:101168.
regulated 3D Printed-electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds for Bone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101168
Regeneration. Biomaterials, 276:121037. 17. Roque R, Barbosa GF, Guastaldi AC, 2021, Design and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121037 3D Bioprinting of Interconnected Porous Scaffolds for
7. Lin K, Sheikh R, Romanazzo S, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of Bone Regeneration. An Additive Manufacturing Approach.
Bioceramic Scaffolds-Barriers to the Clinical Translation: J Manuf Processes, 64:655–63.
From Promise to Reality, and Future Perspectives. Materials, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.057
12:2660–80. 18. Schiele NR, Corr DT, Huang Y, et al., 2010, Laser-based
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172660 Direct-write Techniques for Cell Printing. Biofabrication,
8. Shi C, Hou X, Zhao D, et al., 2022, Preparation of the Bioglass/ 2:032001.
Chitosan-alginate Composite Scaffolds with High Bioactivity https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001
and Mechanical Properties as Bone Graft Materials. J Mech 19. Beheshtizadeh N, Azami M, Abbasi H, et al., 2021, Applying
Behav Biome Mater, 126:105062. Extrusion-based 3D Printing Technique Accelerates
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105062 Fabricating Complex Biphasic Calcium Phosphate-based
9. Faour O, Dimitriou R, Cousins CA, et al., 2011, The Use Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration. J Adv Res, In Press.
of Bone Graft Substitutes in Large Cancellous Voids: Any https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.012
Specific Needs? Injury, 42:S87–90. 20. Kang JH, Jang KJ, Sakthiabirami K, et al., 2020, Mechanical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.020 Properties and Optical Evaluation of Scaffolds Produced from
10. Liang H, Zhao D, Feng X, et al., 2020, 3D-printed Porous 45S5 Bioactive Glass Suspensions Via Stereolithography.
Titanium Scaffolds Incorporating Niobium for High Bone Ceram Int, 46:2481–8.
Regeneration Capacity. Mater Des, 194:108890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.242
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108890 21. Kumar P, Ebbens S, Zhao X, 2021, Inkjet Printing of

212 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4