Page 218 - IJB-8-4
P. 218
3D Printed Porous 45S5 Bioceramic
scaffolds (40 wt%) produced large shrinkage after design, the porosity of average perforated cylindrical
sintering. Moreover, based on the scaffold structure scaffold (Figure 5A) was higher than that of layered
A
B
Figure 5. Images of average perforated cylindrical scaffold. (A) A printed layered perforated cylindrical scaffold. (B) A sintered scaffold.
(A and B) show images of the overall structures of the scaffolds. (a1 – a2) and (b1 – b2) show the struts of the 3D printed scaffolds, and
(a3 – a4) and (b3 – b4) are the SEM images of their microstructures.
A B
Figure 6. CT reconstruction of scaffold 3D images. (A) Average perforated cylindrical scaffold. (B) Layered perforated cylindrical scaffold.
210 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
