Page 246 - IJB-8-4
P. 246

3DP PEEK implants for chest wall reconstruction
           7. Conclusion                                       4.  Hirt L,  Reiser  A, Spolenak R,  et  al.,  2017, Additive

           3DP PEEK implants are the ideal  material  for repair   manufacturing  of metal  structures at  the micrometer  scale.
           of  orthopedic  defects.  It  is  necessary  to  perform  finite   Adv Mater, 29 :1604211.
           element analysis for every implant to achieve anatomic   https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604211
           and mechanical match. The FDM technology is a suitable   5.   Liaw CY, Guvendiren M, 2017, Current and emerging applications
           method for manufacturing PEEK implants. Up to now,      of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication, 9:024102.
           the thoracic  surgeons have used 114 personalized  3DP   https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279
           PEEK implants to reconstruct the chest wall defect and   6.  Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H,  et al., 2016,
           further established the surgical standards of the implants
           in Chinese clinical guidelines.                         Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in
                                                                   surgery: A systematic review. Surgery, 159:1485–500.
           Acknowledgments                                         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017
           We thank Feiyang Yin for editing the manuscript.    7.  Khorsandi D, Fahimipour A, Abasian P, et al., 2021, 3D and
                                                                   4D printing in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery: Printing
           Conflict of interest                                    techniques,  materials,  and applications.  Acta  Biomater,
           No conflicts of interest were reported by all authors.  122:26–49.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.044
           Author contributions                                8.  Burnard JL, Parr  WC, Choy  WJ,  et al., 2020, 3D-printed
           Conceptualization: Lijun Huang, Dichen Li, and  Tao     spine surgery implants: A systematic review of the efficacy
              Jiang                                                and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf
           Investigation: Lei Wang, Xiaolong Yan, and Changquan    devices. Eur Spine J, 29:1248–60.
              Shi                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06236-2
           Writing – original draft: Lei Wang, Chuncheng Yang, and   9.  Melville  JC, Manis CS, Shum JW,  et al., 2019, Single-
              Changning Sun
           Writing – review and editing: Jiangkang He and Chaozong   Unit 3D-Printed Titanium Reconstruction Plate for Maxillary
              Liu                                                  Reconstruction:  The Evolution of Surgical Reconstruction
                                                                   for Maxillary Defects-A Case Report and Review of Current
           Funding                                                 Techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77:874.e1–13.
           The work was supported by National Key R&D Program of   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.030
           China (2018YFE0207900), Lingyun Program of Air Force   10. Kamel  MK, Cheng  A,  Vaughan  B,  et  al., 2020, Sternal
           Medical University (2019cyjhwl), Top-Notch Project of   reconstruction  using customized 3D-printed  titanium
           Medical Science and Technology for Youth Cultivation of   implants. Ann Thorac Surg, 109:e411–4.
           the Army (18QNP028), Clinical Development Innovation    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.087
           Fund of  Air Force Medical  University(2021XB024),
           Zhufeng Program of  Air Force Medical University    11.  Wang L, Cao T, Li X, et al., 2016, Three-dimensional printing
           (2019rcfcyxl), Key R&D Program of Guangdong             titanium  ribs for complex  reconstruction  after extensive
           Province (2018B090906001), and the National Natural     posterolateral chest wall resection in lung cancer. J Thorac
           Science Foundation of China (51835010).                 Cardiovasc Surg, 152:e5–7.
           References                                              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.064
                                                               12. Anderson LA, Christie M, Blackburn BE,  et al., 2021,
           1.  Ambrosi A, Pumera M, 2016, 3D-printing technologies for  3D-printed  titanium  metaphyseal  cones in revision  total
               electrochemical applications. Chem Soc Rev, 45:2740–55.  knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems. Bone
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00714c                  Joint J, 103-b 6 Suppl A:150–7.
           2.  Hu G, Kang J, Ng LW,  et  al., 2018, Functional  inks and  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b6.Bjj-2020-2504.R1
               printing  of two-dimensional  materials.  Chem Soc  Rev,  13.  Moradiellos J, Amor S, Córdoba M, et al., 2017, Functional chest
               47:3265–300.                                        wall reconstruction with a biomechanical three-dimensionally
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00084k                  printed implant. Ann Thorac Surg, 103:e389–91.
           3.  Layani M, Wang X, Magdassi S, 2018, Novel Materials for 3D   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.048
               Printing by Photopolymerization. Adv Mater, 30:e1706344.  14. Wang L, Huang L, Li X,  et al.,  2019, Three-dimensional
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706344              printing PEEK implant: A novel choice for the reconstruction

           238                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251