Page 243 - IJB-8-4
P. 243

Wang, et al.
            A                                              B                         D











                                                               C                   E









           F
                                                                                           H
                                                                            G











           Figure 10. Schematic diagram of FDM PEEK implant modification and animal experiment results (A); SEM images of the interface on
           amidogen PEEK (B); three-dimensional images of the interface on amidogen PEEK (C); the comparison of cellular proliferation in FDM
           PEEK, NPEEK scaffolds, and blank materials using CCK-8 method (D); the comparison of cell migration on NPEEK and PEEK interfaces
           using wound healing assay (E); HE staining and SEM images of soft-tissue ingrowth into the FDM PEEK and NPEEK scaffolds in vivo for
           2 weeks (F); the clathrate PEEK or NPEEK implants and the rabbit after chest wall reconstruction surgery (G); the comparison of drainage
           fluid (H) and extubation time (I) after chest wall reconstruction surgery in FDM PEEK and NPEEK groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P
           < 0.001) .
                 [46]
           FVC  value. For the patients receiving  3DP sternum   PEEK implant happened in a patient due to the recurrence
           PEEK  implants,  pulmonary  function  results  show that   of tumor in situ and erosion in the rib residue (Figure 8H
           pre-operative and post-operative FVC ranged from 2.65   and I).
           ± 0.72 L to 2.23 ± 0.55 L (P < 0.001), FEV1/FVC ranged
           from 82.4% ± 6.7% to 87.5% ± 9.3% (P > 0.05), MVV   5. Interface modification and composite
           ranged from 76.38 ± 24.61 L/min to 71.9 ± 24.4 L/min   print of PEEK implant for clinical need
           (P > 0.05), and partial pressure of oxygen ranged from
           84.1 ± 9.7 mmHg to 80.2 ± 10.2 mmHg (P > 0.05). The   The most common and serious implant-related
           mean reduction of FVC in these patients  after surgery   complication in the follow-up period is incision ulcer,
           was 0.44 ± 0.25 L, which represents 16.6% of the pre-  accounting for about 5.3% (6/114). These patients have
           operative  FVC value.  As compared with the titanium   to receive a second surgery to remove the implants and
           plates,  3DP PEEK implants  may  help  the patients  to   transfer a myocutaneous flap to cover the chest wall defects
           preserve more pulmonary function.                   until 6 – 9 months after the first surgery. Some reasons can
               In the follow-up period, six patients suffered from   be summarized as follows. First, the hydrophobic surface
           incision ulcer 1 year after the surgery (Figure 8G), which   of PEEK materials inhibited protein deposition and tissue
           may be related to the hydrophobic surface of PEEK   adhesion with the implant. There may be relative friction
           material.  Three  patients  received  the  first  surgery  to   between the soft tissue and implant that may cause the
           remove the exposed partial PEEK implant, then received   incision ulcer in the follow-up visit. For another thing,
           a  second  pectoralis  major  myocutaneous  flap  transfer   due to the wide excision of chest wall tumor, the lack of
           surgery  2  weeks later.  The  displacement  of  the  3DP   muscle coverage is also the main cause of post-operative

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       235
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248