Page 242 - IJB-8-4
P. 242

3DP PEEK implants for chest wall reconstruction
           reserved in the connection of the implant for embracing   implants  for chest wall reconstruction. However, the
           binding. Based on our experience, the 3DP PEEK implant   mechanical  property of titanium  is much greater than
                                                                                               [72]
           should be secured below the residual ribs to prevent the   that of cortical bone or costicartilage . The motion of
           implant from pushing against the skin and causing ulcers.   thorax  is restricted  after  using the  titanium  implants.
           For  the manubrium sterni and mesosternum implants,   The forced vital capacity  (FVC) of patients  is reduced
           we usually use eight titanium screws to fix the implant   by more than 30% after traditional  surgery [73-76] . The
           with the residual sternum (Figure 8E and F). It is worth   pulmonary function of patients decreased significantly if
           mentioning  that  we always  use two  wires to  bind  the   the mechanical mismatch implants were used in surgery.
           implant with the clavicle. Although this fixation does not   Thus,  the  FDM  process  with  low  crystallinity  (≤25%)
           restore motion of the sternoclavicular joint, it is stable   was used in the middle segment of 3DP PEEK implant to
           enough in the body during the  following  up period.   make it flexible.
           A pericardial patch was also suspended under the 3DP    To test the effect of 3DP PEEK implant to pulmonary
           PEEK implants to close the thorax. In our hospital,   function,  each patient  received  pulmonary  function
           65  patients received sternum reconstruction  using 3DP   examination  before and after surgery.  The pulmonary
           PEEK implants,  including  11 whole sternum implants,   function  of each  patient  was tested  and compared
           34  manubrium  sterni,  and  20  mesosternum  implants.   between pre-operative (1 week before the operation) and
           The average weight of the 3DP PEEK sternum implant   post-operative  (3  months after the operation) groups.
           was 107.4 ± 33.6 g. The main chest wall diseases were   For the patients receiving  3DP ribs PEEK implants,
           primary  tumor  and infection.  The  average  chest  wall   pulmonary  function  results  show that  pre-operative
           defect size was 140.9 ± 101.5 cm  (range, 64– 900 cm ).  and post-operative  FVC ranged from 2.90  ±  0.66  L to
                                                        2
                                       2
                                                               2.53 ± 0.80 L (P < 0.001), FEV1/FVC ranged from 82.4%
           4.3. Pulmonary function assessment and adverse      ± 5.7% to 81.8% ± 6.7% (P > 0.05), MVV ranged from
           reactions of implants                               83.73 ± 21.15 L/min to 83.19 ± 28.4 L/min (P < 0.49),
                                                               and partial  pressure of oxygen ranged from 86.1
           A healthy person breathes  about 20  times/min.  That   ± 10.7 mmHg to 80.4 ± 9.2 mmHg (P > 0.05). The mean
           is to say, and the thorax moves more than 10 million   reduction of FVC in these patients after surgery was 0.36
           times  in 1  year. The  titanium  plates  are  the  traditional   ± 0.25 L, which represents 12.4% of the pre-operative

           A                                                          B                     C







                                                                                            D







           E                        F                          G











           Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the preparation process to create the microporous architectures in the FDM PEEK scaffolds (A); SEM
           images of SHPEEK scaffolds with a sulfonation processing time of 30 s (B); the comparison of compressive strength (C) and compressive
           modulus (D) in FDM PEEK, HPEEK, and SHPEEK scaffolds; the comparison of cellular proliferation in FDM PEEK, HPEEK, and
           SHPEEK scaffolds using CCK-8 method (E); the comparison of deposited calcified nodules in FDM PEEK, HPEEK, and SHPEEK scaffolds
           (F); HE staining and SEM images of soft-tissue ingrowth into the FDM HPEEK and SHPEEK scaffolds in vivo for 2 weeks (G) (*P < 0.05
           and **P < 0.01) .
                      [45]
           234                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247