Page 281 - IJB-8-4
P. 281

Xu, et al.
               method for fabricating fibrin gels. BMC Res Notes, 5:423.  bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Primers, 1:75.
               https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-423         53.  Zhang YS,  Khademhosseini A,  2020,  Engineering  in vitro
           42.  EzEldeen  M,  Toprakhisar  B,  Murgia  D,  et al.,  2021,   human tissue models through bio-design and manufacturing.
               Chlorite  oxidized  oxyamylose  differentially  influences  the   Biodes Manuf, 3:155–9.
               microstructure of fibrin and self-assembling peptide hydrogels   54.  He Y, Nie J, Xie M, et al., 2020, Why choose 3D bioprinting?
               as well as dental pulp stem cell behavior. Sci Rep, 11:5687.  Part  III:  Printing  in  vitro  3D  models  for  drug  screening.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84405-4          Biodes Manuf, 3:160–3.
           43.  Kong HJ, Smith MK, Mooney DJ, 2003, Designing alginate   55.  Zhou J, Tian Z, Tian QY, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of a
               hydrogels  to  maintain  viability  of  immobilized  cells.   biomimetic  meniscal  scaffold  for  application  in  tissue
               Biomaterials, 24:4023–9.                            engineering. Bioact Mater, 6:1711–26.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00295-3       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.027
           44.  Patois E, Cruz SO, Tille J, et al., 2009, Novel thermosensitive   56.  Kolesky  DB,  Truby  RL,  Gladman  AS,  et al.,  2014,  3D
               chitosan  hydrogels:  In vivo  evaluation.  J  Biomed Mater   bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue
               Res A, 91:324–30.                                   constructs. Adv Mater, 26:3124–30.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32211                 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
           45.  Soares LS, Gomes BT, Miliao GL, et al., 2021, Mixed starch/  57.  Ouyang L, Armstrong JP, Chen Q, et al., 2020, Void-free 3D
               chitosan  hydrogels:  Elastic  properties  as  modelled  through   bioprinting  for  in-situ  endothelialization  and  microfluidic
               simulated annealing algorithm and their ability to strongly reduce   perfusion. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1908349.
               yellow sunset (INS 110) release. Carbohydr Polym, 255:117526.     https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201908349
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117526   58.  Wang C, Xu Y, Xia J, et al., 2021, Multi-scale hierarchical
           46.  Park S, Goodman BM, Pruitt BL, 2005, Measurement of Mechanical   scaffolds  with  aligned  micro-fibers  for  promoting  cell
               Properties  of  Caenorhabditis  elegans  with  a  Piezoresistive   alignment. Biomed Mater. 16:045047.
               Microcantilever System. 3  IEEE/EMBS Special Topic Conference      https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac0a90
                                rd
               on Microtechnology in Medicine and Biology, p. 400–3.  59.  Li SJ, 2009, Studies on Three Dimensional Controlled Multi-
           47.  Li Z, Reimer C, Wang T, et al., 2020, Thermal and Mechanical   Cell Assembling Technology. Beijing: Tsinghua University.
               Properties of the Biocomposites of Miscanthus Biocarbon and   60.  Khalil S, Nam J, Sun W, 2005, Multi, a university dimensional
               Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate)   (PHBV).   controlled  multi-cell  assembling  technology.  B  Rapid
               Polymers, 12:1300.                                  Prototyp J, 11:9–17.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061300           61.  Zhao Y, 2017, Fundamental Research and Application Based
           48.  Carvalho C, Landers R, Muelhaupt R, 2004, Soft and hard   on Integration of 3D Cell Printing and Microfluidic and Chip
               implant fabrication using 3D-bioplotting. SFF Symp Proc.,   Manufacturing. Beijing, Tsinghua University.
               732–741.                                        62.  Ouyang L, 2017, Studies on Microextrusive 3D Bioprinting
           49.  Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D   Based on Bioink Crosslinking Mechanism. Beijing, Tsinghua
               printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev,   University.
               117:10212–90.                                   63.  Kjar A, McFarland B, Mecham K, et al., 2021, Engineering of
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074         tissue constructs using coaxial bioprinting. Bioact Mater, 6:460–71.
           50.  Zhu  Y,  Joralmon  D,  Shan  W,  et  al., 2021, 3D printing   64.  Huang  YA,  Bu  NB,  Duan  YQ,  et  al.,  2013,
               biomimetic  materials  and  structures  for  biomedical   Electrohydrodynamic direct-writing. Nanoscale, 5;12007.
               applications. Biodes Manuf, 4:405–28.           65.  McCormack  A,  Highley  CB,  Leslie  NR,  et al.,  2020,  3D
           51.  Rawal P, Tripathi DM, Ramakrishna S, et al., 2021, Prospects for   printing  in  suspension  baths:  Keeping  the  promises  of
               3D bioprinting of organoids. Biodes Manuf, 4:627–40.  bioprinting afloat. Trends Biotechnol, 38:584–93.
           52.  Zhang YS, Ghazaleh H, Tania H, et al., 2021, 3D extrusion      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.020




                                                               Publisher’s note
                                                               Whioce  Publishing  remains  neutral  with  regard  to
                                                               jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
                                                               affiliations.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       273
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286