Page 279 - IJB-8-4

Xu, et al.
Bluetooth communication and a customized printing References
operation program, enabling us to realize a variety
of 3D bioprinting processes (based on motor-driven 1. Donald E. Ingber, 2016, Reverse Engineering Human
piston extrusion, pneumatic driven piston extrusion, and Pathophysiology with Organs-on-Chips. Cell, 164:1105–9.
mechanical screw extrusion based on three power drive https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.049
modes) in a small space (300 mm × 300 mm ×300 mm) 2. Atala A, 2020, Introduction: 3D printing for biomaterials.
with a high level of automation and accuracy. The software Chem Rev, 120:10545–6.
and hardware are modularized. Standardized and modular
designs are made for the nozzle, molding environment, drive https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00139
system, bioink cartridge (silo), light curing module, etc. The 3. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016, Effect of bioink
printing nozzles were fixed on the developed 3D motion properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting
platform as required and could be used alternately in a print of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication, 8:035020.
program. To achieve soft and hard materials, multiscale https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
fiber filaments, and multiscale structures, the system 4. Ouyang L, Yao R, Mao S, et al., 2015, Three-dimensional
realizes the printing of thermosensitive and photosensitive
hydrogels, the fused deposition modeling of polymers, SE, bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs high-throughput
near-field electrohydrodynamic direct-writing, and other and highly uniform embryoid body formation. Biofabrication,
process integrated operations on only one platform. The 7:044101.
experimental results demonstrate that the printed material http://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/04410
can cover commercially available hard polymers and soft 5. Sun W, Starly B, Daly AC, et al., 2020, The bioprinting
hydrogels, satisfying a wide range of applications. This
system increases the scope and research potential of these roadmap. Biofabrication, 12:022002
material and fabrication technology combinations. Initial https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158
experiments and prefabricated sample construction validate 6. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
the system’s strong potential application in custom scaffold organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.
fabrication due to its modular design and ability to integrate https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
any available printing mode in a single fabrication session. 7. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al., 2016, A 3D bioprinting
We highlight that this printing platform has significant
advantages, including portability, modularity, and an easy- system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with
to-use interface. We reasonably envision the great potential structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 34:312–9.
of our multifunctional modular full-scene application https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413
printer in various fields, such as medicine, biomedicine, 8. Jorgensen AM, Yoo JJ, Atala A, 2020, Solid organ bioprinting:
education, and space experiments. Strategies to achieve organ function. Chem Rev, 120:11093–127.
Data availability statement https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00145
9. Mikos AG, Herring SW, Ochareon P, et al., 2006, Engineering
All data that support the findings of this study are included complex tissues. Tissue Eng, 12:3307–39.
within the article.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.3307
Funding 10. Atala A, Kasper FK, Mikos AG, 2012, Engineering complex
National Key Research and Development Program of tissues. Sci Transl Med, 4:160rv12.
China (2018YFA0703004). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004890
11. Nemir S, West JL, 2010, Synthetic materials in the study of
Conflicts of interest cell response to substrate rigidity. Ann Biomed Eng, 38:2–20.
No conflicts of interest were reported by all authors. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9811-1
12. Kim HN, Kang DH, Kim MS, et al., 2012, Patterning methods
Authors’ contributions
for polymers in cell and tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng,
Conceptualization: Wei Sun,Ting Zhang,Yuanyuan Xu 40:1339–55.
Investigation: Yuanyuan Xu,Chengjin Wang,Hui Liu 13. Karimi A, Shojaei A, 2017, Measurement of the mechanical
Methodology: Yuanyuan Xu properties of the human kidney. IRBM, 38:292–7.
Formal analysis: Yuanyuan Xu
Writing – original draft: Yuanyuan Xu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2017.08.001
Writing – review & editing: Wei Sun,Zhuo Xiong,Ting 14. Umale S, Deck C, Bourdet N, et al., 2013, Experimental
Zhang,Yang Yang mechanical characterization of abdominal organs: Liver,

International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4 271