Page 275 - IJB-8-4
P. 275

Xu, et al.
           print head is 24°C (the needle size is 25 G, the movement   diameter  of  200  μm,  the  measured  printing  filament
           speed of the nozzle is 5 mm/s, and the ejection speed is 0.8   diameter is 197.11 ± 37.93 μm (Figure 9A). For the nozzle
           mm /s). After printing, the 365 nm blue light that comes   with an inner diameter of 300 μm, the measured printing
              3
           with the nozzle head was used to irradiate it at 5 mW/cm    filament  diameter  is  295.67  ±  37.94  μm  (Figure  9B).
                                                          2
           for 30 s. The printed sample was incubated in an incubator   For  the  nozzle  with  an  inner  diameter  of  400  μm, the
           for more than 20 min to stabilize the structure, and then,   measured  printing  filament  diameter  is  432.00  ±  72.64
           a picture was taken with a digital camera with a macro   μm (Figure 9C). For the nozzle with an inner diameter
           lens  for  observation  or  further  incubation.  GelMA   ink   of  600  μm,  the  measured  printing  filament  diameter  is
                                                      +
           containing  HBVP-GFP  (GFP-labeled  cells)  was  used   499.34 ± 110.85 μm (Figure 9D). For the nozzle with an
           to  print  grid  structures  and  for  up  to  7  days  of  culture   inner diameter of 800 μm, the measured printing filament
           observation. On days 1, 3, 5, and 7, the cell morphology   diameter is 624.18 ± 114.35 μm (Figure 9E). On the basis
           (Figure 8D) and cell viability (Figure 8E) were detected.   of these process data, the ability to print complex PCL
           The cell survival rate of hCMEC/D3 and HBVP cells after   structures is further verified. Including square and circular
           printing exceeded 80%, which met the requirements for   structures with different filling styles and sizes, brackets
           further use. The cells in the hydrogel began to stretch on   for  the  femoral  head,  and  tibial  model  structures  were
           the 3  day, and some cells joined together on the 7  day   printed using a motor-driven piston-based microextrusion
                                                      th
               rd
           (Figure  8D[a-d]). This  shows  that  the  printing  process   nozzle (Figure 7E). Two-layer grid supports and cube-
           does not cause damage to the cells. Therefore, the photo   shaped scaffolds were printed using a pneumatic extrusion
           cross-linking material-based printing nozzle developed in   nozzle (Figure 7F, the gas pressure was 0.5 ~ 0.6 MPa).
           this paper meets the basic printing needs.          Cardiovascular  stents  were  printed  using  a  mechanical
                                                               screw-based  nozzle  (Figure  7G).  The  above  results
           3.3. Fused deposition modeling                      showed that this printing system has good forming quality
           PCL has the characteristics of a low melting point (~60°C),   in the formation of complex PCL structures.
           degradability, and good biocompatibility. It has also been   3.4. Coaxial printing results
           approved by the FDA and is an ideal material for biological
           3D printing stents. Because the melting point of PCL is   Coaxial  extrusion  bioprinting  is  an  emerging  branch  of
           relatively low, the temperature will soon drop below 37°C,   bioprinting that shows strong potential in enhancing the
           which is not damaging to the cells, after hot melt printing.  engineering versatility of bioprinting. Coaxial bioprinting
               In  this  system,  three  printing  methods  based  on   facilitates the fabrication of complex tissue structures by
           motor  driven  pistons,  pneumatic  driven  pistons,  and   enabling the concentric deposition of biomaterials. It was
           mechanical  screw  extrusion  are  developed  for  fused   initially  applied  to  fabricate  simple  tubular  vasculature
           deposition  modeling.  The  printing  results  of  these   but has now largely evolved to integrate complex cellular
           three nozzles were tested. The results of different inner   composition and self-assembly, ECM patterning structures,
           diameter nozzles on the diameter of the printed PCL are   controlled release, and multimaterial gradient profiles .
                                                                                                          [63]
           shown  in  Figure  9  (using  a  motor-driven  piston-based   Before printing, the configured bioink was loaded
           microextrusion  nozzle).  For  the  nozzle  with  an  inner   on the two nozzles (30% [w/t] PF127 in inner, 10% [w/t]

                         A              B             C              D             E






















           Figure 9. The results of different inner diameter nozzles on the diameter of the printed PCL. Scale bar: 2 mm.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       267
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280