Page 280 - IJB-8-4
P. 280

Multifunctional 3D Bioprinting System for Construction of Complex Tissue Structure Scaffolds
               kidney & spleen. J Mech Beha Biomed Mater, 17:22–33.  properties  of  ligament  and  tendon.  In:  Skeletal  Tissue
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.010         Mechanics. New York, NY: Springer.
           15.  Thubrikar  M,  Piepgrass WC,  Bosher  LP,  et al.,  1980, The   29.  Maganaris  CN,  Paul  JP,  1999,  In vivo  human  tendon
               elastic modulus of canine aortic valve leaflets in vivo and in   mechanical properties. J Physiol, 521:307-13.
               vitro. Circ Res, 47:792–800.                        https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00307.x
               https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.47.5.792         30.  Wu D, Isaksson P, Ferguson SJ, et al., 2018, Young’s modulus of
           16.  Thubrikar MJ, Aouad J, Nolan SP, 1986, Comparison of the   trabecular bone at the tissue level: A review. Acta Biomater, 78:1–12.
               in vivo  and  in vitro mechanical  properties  of aortic  valve      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.001
               leaflets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 92:29–36.   31.  Gefen A, Margulies SS, 2004, Are in vivo and in situ brain
           17.  Silver FH, Kato YP, Ohno M, et al., 1992, Analysis of mammalian   tissues mechanically similar? J Biomech. 37:1339–52.
               connective tissue: relationship between hierarchical structures and      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.032
               mechanical properties. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2:165–98.  32.  Budday  S,  Nay  R,  de  Rooij  R,  et al.,  2015,  Mechanical
           18.  Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, 1990, Elastic properties   properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation.
               of human skin: Relation to age, sex, and anatomical region.   J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 46:318–30.
               Arch Dermatol Res, 282:283–8.                       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024
               https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375720              33.  Morin  F,  Chabanas  M,  Courtecuisse  H,  et al.,  2017,
           19.  Abe H, Hayashi K, Sato M, 1996, Data Book on Mechanical   Biomechanical  modeling  of  brain  soft  tissues  for  medical
               Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs. Tokyo: Springer.  applications. Biomech Living Organs, 2017:127–46.
           20.  Akhtar  R,  Sherratt  MJ,  Cruickshank  JK,  et al.,  2011,   34.  Boschetti F, Pennati G, Gervaso F, et al., 2004, Biomechanical
               Characterizing the elastic properties of tissues. Mater Today   properties  of  human  articular  cartilage  under  compressive
               (Kidlington), 14:96–105.                            loads. Biorheology, 41:159–66.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70059-1   35.  Xu  YY,  Guo  X,  Yang  ST,  et  al.,  2018,  Construction  of
           21.  Arda  K,  Ciledag  N, Aribas  BK,  et  al.,  2013,  Quantitative   bionic tissue engineering cartilage scaffold based on three-
               assessment of the elasticity values of liver with shear wave   dimensional  printing  and  oriented  frozen  technology.
               ultrasonographic elastography. Indian J Med Res, 137:911–5.  J Biomed Mater Res A, 106:1664–76.
           22.  Yeh  WC,  Li  PC,  Jeng  YM,  et  al.,  2002,  Elastic  modulus      https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36368
               measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology.   36.  Lefèvre  E,  Baron  C,  Pithioux  M,  2013,  Evaluation  of  the
               Ultrasound Med Biol, 28:467–74.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00489-1       elastic modulus of cortical bone: adaptation of experimental
           23.  Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM,  Kallel  F,  et  al.,  1998,  Elastic   protocols  to  small  samples.  Comput Methods Biomech
               moduli  of  breast  and  prostate  tissues  under  compression.   Biomed Engin, 16 Suppl 1:328–9.
               Ultrason Imaging, 20:260–74.                        https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.815945
               https://doi.org/10.1177/016173469802000403      37.  Rudolph  AS,  1994,  Biomaterial  biotechnology  using  self-
           24.  Mikula ER, Jester JV, Juhasz T, 2016, Measurement of an   assembled lipid microstructures. J Cell Biochem, 56:183–7.
               elasticity map in the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis      https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240560211
               Sci, 57:3282–6.                                 38.  Stupp SI, 2010, Self-assembly and biomaterials. Nano Lett,
           25.  Qin X, Tian L, Zhang H, et al., 2019, Evaluation of corneal   10:4783–6.
               elastic modulus based on Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug      https://doi.org/10.1021/nl103567y
               Technology. Biomed Eng Online, 18:42.           39.  Raub CB, Putnam AJ, Tromberg BJ, et al., 2010, Predicting
               https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0662-1           bulk mechanical properties of cellularized collagen gels using
           26.  Samani A, Zubovits J, Plewes D, 2007, Elastic moduli of normal   multiphoton microscopy. Acta Biomater, 6:4657–65.
               and pathological human breast tissues: An inversion-technique-     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.004
               based investigation of 169 samples. Phys Med Biol, 52:1565–76.  40.  McBane JE, Vulesevic B, Padavan DT, et al., 2013, Evaluation
               https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/002          of  a  collagen-chitosan  hydrogel  for  potential  use  as  a  pro-
           27.  Gefena  A,  Dilmoney  B,  2007,  Mechanics  of  the  normal   angiogenic site for islet transplantation. PLoS One, 8:e77538.
               woman’s breast. Technol Health Care, 15:259–71.     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077538
           28.  Martin  RB,  Burr  DB,  Sharkey  NA,  1998,  Mechanical   41.  Murphy KC, Leach JK, 2012, A reproducible, high throughput

           272                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285