Page 165 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Bio-inks for 3D printing cell microenvironment

33. Banaszkiewicz PA, Kader DF, 2014, The compressive 50. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, 2011, Role of materials surface
behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure, in Classic topography on mammalian cell response. Int Mater Rev,
Papers in Orthopaedics, Springer, London, 457–460. 56(4): 243–266.
34. Hayashi K, Iwata M, 2015, Stiffness of cancer cells measured 51. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H, 2003, RGD modified
with an AFM indentation method. J Mech Behav Biomed polymers: Biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and
Mater, 49: 105–111. beyond. Biomaterials, 24(24): 4385–4415.
35. Yousafzai MS, Coceano G, Bonin S, et al., 2017, Investigating 52. Carvalho JL, Miranda de Goes A, Gomes DA, et al., 2013,
the effect of cell substrate on cancer cell stiffness by optical Innovative Strategies for Tissue Engineering, INTECH Open
tweezers. J Biomech, 60: 266–269. Access Publisher. London, United Kingdom, 295–313.
36. Milovanovic P, Potocnik J, Djonic D, et al., 2012, Age-related 53. Kim D-H, Lipke EA, Kim P, et al. 2010, Nanoscale cues
deterioration in trabecular bone mechanical properties at regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac
material level: Nanoindentation study of the femoral neck in tissue constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(2): 565–570.
women by using AFM. Exp Gerontol, 47(2): 154–159. 54. Fujita S, Ohshima M, Iwata H, 2009, Time-lapse observation
37. Gentili C, Cancedda R, 2009, Cartilage and bone extracellular of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns. J R Soc Interface,
matrix. Curr Pharm Design, 15(12): 1334–1348. 6 Suppl(3): S269–77.
38. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K, 2019, Extracellular 55. Tatsumi R, Sheehan SM, Iwasaki H, et al., 2001, Mechanical
matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers. J stretch induces activation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in
Cell Biochem, 120(3): 2782–2790. vitro. Exp Cell Res, 267(1): 107–114.
39. Berdyyeva TK, Woodworth CD, Sokolov I, 2005, Human 56. Albro MB, Nims RJ, Cigan AD, et al., 2013, Accumulation
epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: of exogenous activated TGF-β in the superficial zone of
Direct measurements. Phys Med Biol, 50(1): 81–92. articular cartilage. Biophys J, 104(8): 1794–1804.
40. Kato S, Espinoza N, Lange S, et al., 2008, Characterization 57. Wong VW, Levi K, Akaishi S, et al., 2012, Scar zones: Region-
and phenotypic variation with passage number of cultured specific differences in skin tension may determine incisional
human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. Tissue Cell, scar formation. Plast Reconst Surg, 129(6): 1272–1276.
40(2): 95–102. 58. Storm C, Pastore JJ, MacKintosh FC, et al., 2005, Nonlinear
41. Kiricuta IC, Simplăceanu V, 1975, Tissue water content and elasticity in biological gels. Nature, 435(7039): 191–194.
nuclear magnetic resonance in normal and tumor tissues. 59. Heyes CD, Groll J, Möller M, et al., 2007, Synthesis, patterning
Cancer Res, 35(5): 1164–1167. and applications of star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol)
42. Dhume RY, Barocas VH, 2019, Emergent structure- biofunctionalized surfaces. Mol Biosyst, 3(6): 419–430.
dependent relaxation spectra in viscoelastic fiber networks 60. Al-Nimry S, Dayah AA, Hasan I, et al., 2021, Cosmetic,
in extension. Acta Biomater, 87: 245–255. biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of fish gelatin/
43. Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al., 2016, Hydrogels hydrolysates. Marine Drugs, 19(3): 145.
with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and 61. Franchi M, Trirè A, Quaranta M, et al., 2007, Collagen
activity. Nat Mater, 15(3): 326–334. structure of tendon relates to function. Sci World J, 7: 404–420.
44. Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Darnell M, et al., 2015, Substrate stress 62. Soofi SS, Last JA, Liliensiek SJ, et al., 2009, The elastic
relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat Comm, 6: 6364. modulus of matrigel as determined by atomic force
45. Adebowale K, Gong Z, Hou JC, et al., 2021, Enhanced microscopy. J Struct Biol, 167(3): 216–219.
substrate stress relaxation promotes filopodia-mediated cell 63. Bassani F, 2005, Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics,
migration. Nat Mater, 20(9): 1290–1299. Elsevier. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 103–105.
46. Magdalena D, Michał W, Christopher BA, 2019, The effect of 64. Salam Hamdy MA, Abu-Thabit NY, 2018, Stimuli-responsive
a stylus tip on roundness deviation with different roughness. biopolymer nanocarriers for drug delivery applications.
Adv Manuf II, 147–157. Types Triggers, 1: 405–432.
47. Smith JR, Breakspear S, Campbell SA, 2003, AFM in surface 65. Tilak D, Yimin Q, 2016, Medical Textile Materials, Woodhead
finishing: Part II. Surface roughness. Trans IMF, 81(3): Publishing. Sawston, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 31–33.
B55-B58.
66. Vieira AC, Vieira JC, Guedes RM, et al., 2010, Degradation
48. Yilbas Z, Hasmi MSJ, 1999, Surface roughness measurement and viscoelastic properties of PLA-PCL, PGA-PCL, PDO
using an optical system, J Mater Process Technol, 88(1-3): 10–22. and PGA Fibres. Mater Sci Forum, 636–637: 825–832.
49. Hameed NA, Ali IM, Hassun HK, 2019, Calculating surface 67. Hodgskinson R, Currey JD, Evans GP, 1989, Hardness, an
roughness for a large scale SEM images by mean of image indicator of the mechanical competence of cancellous bone.
processing. Energy Procedia, 157: 84–89. J Orthop Res, 7(5): 754–758.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 157 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632