Page 166 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Bio-inks for 3D printing cell microenvironment

68. Wu Y, Xiang Y, Fang J, et al., 2019, The influence of the development of encapsulated cells. Appl Mater Today, 22:
stiffness of GelMA substrate on the outgrowth of PC12 cells. 100892.
Biosci Rep, 39(1): BSR20181748.
84. Arani A, Arunachalam SP, Chang IC, et al., 2017, Cardiac
69. Elkhoury K, Morsink M, Tahri Y, et al., 2021, Synthesis MR elastography for quantitative assessment of elevated
and characterization of C2C12-laden gelatin methacryloyl myocardial stiffness in cardiac amyloidosis. J Magn Reson
(GelMA) from marine and mammalian sources. Int J Biol Imaging, 46(5): 1361–1367.
Macromol, 183: 918–926.
85. Domian IJ, Yu H, Mittal N, 2017, On materials for cardiac
70. Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday LA, et al., 2014, Three- tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 6(2): 1600768.
dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological
hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater, 86. Marinelli JP, Levin DL, Vassallo R, et al., 2017, Quantitative
10(5): 1836–1846. assessment of lung stiffness in patients with interstitial lung
disease using MR elastography. Adv Healthc Mater, 46(2):
71. Subramani R, Izquierdo-Alvarez A, Bhattacharya P, et al., 365–374.
2020, The influence of swelling on elastic properties of
polyacrylamide hydrogels. Front Mater, 7: 212. 87. Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Levin DL, et al., 2014, Estimation
of the absolute shear stiffness of human lung parenchyma
72. Li Z, Liu Z, Ng TY, et al., 2020, The effect of water content using (1) H spin echo, echo planar MR elastography. J Magn
on the elastic modulus and fracture energy of hydrogel. Reson Imaging, 40(5): 1230–1237.
Extreme Mech Lett, 35: 100617.
88. Booth AJ, Hadley R, Cornett AM, et al., 2012, Acellular
73. Wu F, Pang Y, Liu J, 2020, Swelling-strengthening hydrogels normal and fibrotic human lung matrices as a culture
by embedding with deformable nanobarriers. Nat Commun,
11(1): 4502. system for in vitro investigation. Am J Respir Crit Care,
186(9): 866–876.
74. Islam MR, Virag J, Oyen ML, 2020, Micromechanical
poroelastic and viscoelastic properties of ex-vivo soft tissues. 89. Cha SW, Jeong WK, Kim Y, et al., 2014, Nondiseased liver
J Biomech, 113: 110090. stiffness measured by shear wave elastography: A pilot study.
J Med Ultrasound, 33(1): 53–60.
75. Kuzucu M, Vera G, Beaumont M, et al., 2021, Extrusion-
based 3D bioprinting of gradients of stiffness, cell density, 90. Ling W, Lu Q, Lu C, et al., 2014, Effects of vascularity and
and immobilized peptide using thermogelling hydrogels. differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma on tumor and
ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 7(6): 2192–2197. liver stiffness: In vivo and in vitro studies. Ultrasound Med
Biol, 40(4): 739–746.
76. Wang M, Li W, Mille LS, et al., 2022, Digital light processing
based bioprinting with composable gradients. Adv Mater, 91. Yeh W-C, Li P-C, Jeng Y-M, et al., 2002, Elastic modulus
34(1): e2107038. measurements of human liver and correlation with
pathology. Ultrasound Med Biol, 28(4): 467–474.
77. Prendergast ME, Davidson MD, Burdick JA, 2021, A
biofabrication method to align cells within bioprinted 92. Lee DH, Lee JM, Han JK, et al., 2013, MR elastography of
photocrosslinkable and cell-degradable hydrogel constructs healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of
via embedded fibers. Biofabrication, 13(4): 044108. the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging,
38(5): 1215–1223.
78. Swartz MA, Tschumperlin DJ, Kamm RD, et al., 2001,
Mechanical stress is communicated between different cell 93. Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Teo LL, et al., 2014, Magnetic
types to elicit matrix remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: Normal
98(11): 6180–6185. liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 39(1): 1–8.
79. Li X, Tsutsui Y, Matsunaga T, et al., 2011, Precise control
and prediction of hydrogel degradation behavior. 94. Johnson B, Campbell S, Campbell-Kyureghyan N, 2021,
Macromolecules, 44(9): 3567–3571. Characterizing the material properties of the kidney and
80. Lou J, Stowers R, Nam S, et al., 2018, Stress relaxing liver in unconfined compression and probing protocols with
hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, special reference to varying strain rate. Biomechanics, 1(2):
fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell 264–280.
culture. Biomaterials, 154: 213–222. 95. Pozzi R, Parzanese I, Baccarin A, et al., 2017, Point shear-
81. Nam S, Stowers R, Lou J, et al., 2019, Varying PEG density wave elastography in chronic pancreatitis: A promising tool
to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D for staging disease severity. Pancreatology, 17(6): 905–910.
cell culture studies. Biomaterials, 200: 15–24. 96. An H, Shi Y, Guo Q, et al., 2016, Test-retest reliability of 3D
82. Yang Q, Gao B, Xu F, 2020, Recent advances in 4D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas. Clin Radiol, 71(10):
bioprinting. Biotechnol J, 15(1): e1900086. 1068.e7–1068.e12.
83. Jing Y, Yang B, Yuan W, et al., 2021, Dynamic cell-adaptable 97. Gou M, Zheng M, Zhao Y, et al., 2017, Mechanical property
hydrogels with a moderate level of elasticity promote 3D of PEG hydrogel and the 3D red blood cell microstructures

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 158 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632