Page 211 - IJB-9-1
P. 211

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 FeS /PCL scaffold for bone regeneration
                                                                                    2






























            Figure 1. (A) Schematical illustration of this study showing the scaffold fabrication and animal model. (B) FT-IR results and (C) TGA curves for PCL, PF5,
            PF10, and PF20 scaffolds.

               FT-IR tests were conducted to confirm the       an important factor that influences bone ingrowth in vivo.
            incorporation of FeS particles in the PCL scaffolds.   Pore interconnectivity and a pore size larger than 100 mm
                              2
            Figure 1B shows the FT-IR spectra of the scaffolds with the   are required for bone ingrowth . The interconnected
                                                                                          [43]
            representative peaks. Main peaks of PCL at 2,943, 2,866,   pores act as a passage between the pores to support cellular
            and 1,724 cm  corresponding to the vibrations of CH  and   and vascular penetration, thus favoring bone ingrowth.
                      -1
                                                      2
            C=O, respectively, were observed in all scaffolds . In the   For a closer observation of the scaffolds, SEM and
                                                  [41]
            case of FeS ,a broad peak ranging from 2,630 to 3,700 cm    optical microscopy images were evaluated. All scaffolds
                                                         -1
                    2
            was observed in iron sulfide containing scaffolds. This is   showed a proper porous structure, as observed in the
            attributed to O-H stretching. Additionally, sharp peaks at   SEM images. In addition, the particles were observable in
            1,123 and 1,080 cm  were assigned to FeS 2 [42] .   the PF5, PF10, and PF20 scaffolds, as seen in the optical
                           -1
               Moreover, TGA curves in Figure 1C were characterized   microscopy images (Figure 2B). The black dots in the PF
            to confirm the weight fractions of the iron sulfide particles   scaffolds indicate the embedded FeS  particles. In contrast,
                                                                                            2
            in the PCL scaffolds. The complete decomposition of pure   no black dots were visible in the PCL scaffold. The EDS
            PCL was at about 480°C, but in other scaffolds, residues   results revealed that the FeS incorporated PCL scaffolds
                                                                                      2
            were observed due to the embedded iron sulfide particles.   were composed of C, O, Fe, and S; however, Fe and S were
            The residues were approximately 5, 10, and 20%, which   not detected in the pure PCL scaffold (Figure 2C). The
            were in agreement with the weight fractions of FeS  in the   amount of Fe and S increased when the weight fraction of
                                                    2
            composite scaffolds. These results confirmed that the iron   FeS  in the scaffolds increased. These results demonstrated
                                                                  2
            sulfide particles were well-incorporated in the prepared   that FeS  particles were successfully embedded in the PCL-
                                                                     2
            scaffolds.                                         based scaffolds.
            3.2. Scaffold characteristics                         Surface roughness was assessed to evaluate the surface
            Figure 2 illustrates the characteristics of the fabricated   characteristics of the scaffolds. In order to determine the
            scaffolds, which include the surface morphology and   outcome of cell-scaffold interactions, it is necessary to
            roughness of the scaffolds. As seen in the optical images   identify the topography of a scaffold surface, including cell
            in Figure 2A, the FeS  incorporated scaffolds (PF5, PF10,   morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration [44-47] .
                             2
            and PF20) showed a darker color owing to the iron sulfide   A number of studies have shown the importance of surface
            content. Higher weight fractions of iron sulfide resulted in   roughness in osseointegration in vivo . Figure 2D shows
                                                                                             [48]
            a darker color. All scaffolds were fabricated to be 8 mm in   the AFM results. As expected, the addition of FeS  particles
                                                                                                      2
            diameter and 2 mm in height. The strut size and porosity   significantly roughened the surface of the scaffolds. Surface
            are also listed in Table 2. The geometry of the scaffold is   roughness was found to be directly dependent on the FeS
                                                                                                             2
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023)  203                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.636
            V
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216