Page 235 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Cellulose-based bio-inks for bone and cartilage TE

51. Apelgren P, Karabulut E, Amoroso M, et al., 2019, In vivo 62. Ahlfeld T, Köhler T, Czichy C, et al., 2018, A methylcellulose
human cartilage formation in three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogel as support for 3D plotting of complex shaped
constructs with a novel bacterial nanocellulose bioink. ACS calcium phosphate scaffolds. Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 4: 68.
Biomater Sci Eng, 5: 2482–2490.
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030068
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00157
63. Hodder E, Duin S, Kilian D, et al., 2019, Investigating the
52. Huang L, Du X, Fan S, et al., 2019, Bacterial cellulose effect of sterilisation methods on the physical properties and
nanofibers promote stress and fidelity of 3D-printed silk cytocompatibility of methyl cellulose used in combination
based hydrogel scaffold with hierarchical pores. Carbohydr with alginate for 3D-bioplotting of chondrocytes. J Mater
polym, 221: 146–156. Scimater Med, 30: 10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.080 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6211-9
53. Matsiko A, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ, 2015, Scaffold mean 64. Ke H, Zhou J, Zhang L, 2006, Structure and physical
pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic properties of methylcellulose synthesized in NaOH/urea
differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A, 21: solution. Polym Bull, 56: 349–357.
486–497.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0507-5
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545
65. de Carvalho Oliveira G, Filho GR, Vieira JG, et al., 2010,
54. Arca HC, Mosquera-Giraldo LI, Bi V, et al., 2018, Synthesis and application of methylcellulose extracted from
Pharmaceutical Applications of Cellulose Ethers and waste newspaper in CPV-ARI Portland cement mortars.
Cellulose Ether Esters. Biomacromolecules, 19: 2351–2376. J Appl Poly Sci, 118: 1380–1385.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00517 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32477
55. Ratanakamnuan U, Atong D, Aht-Ong D, 2012, Cellulose 66. Schütz K, Placht AM, Paul B, et al., 2017, Three-dimensional
esters from waste cotton fabric via conventional and plotting of a cell-laden alginate/methylcellulose blend:
microwave heating. Carbohydr Polym, 87: 84–94. towards biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs with
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.016 clinically relevant dimensions. J Tissue Engregen Med, 11:
1574–1587.
56. Yang J, An X, Liu L, et al., 2020, Cellulose, hemicellulose,
lignin, and their derivatives as multi-components of bio-based https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2058
feedstocks for 3D printing. Carbohydr Polym, 250: 116881.
67. Ahlfeld T, Doberenz F, Kilian D, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116881 mineralized constructs utilizing multichannel plotting of
a self-setting calcium phosphate cement and a cell-laden
57. Ahlfeld T, Guduric V, Duin S, et al., 2020, Methylcellulose –
a versatile printing material that enables biofabrication of tissue bioink. Biofabrication, 10: 045002.
equivalents with high shape fidelity. Biomater Sci, 8: 2102–2110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aad36d
https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00027b 68. Bernhardt A, Schumacher M, Gelinsky M, 2015, Formation
58. Bonetti L, De Nardo L, Farè S, 2021, Thermo-responsive of osteoclasts on calcium phosphate bone cements and
methylcellulose hydrogels: from design to applications as polystyrene depends on monocyte isolation conditions.
smart biomaterials. Tissue Eng Part B, Rev, 27: 486–513. Tissue Eng Part C, Methods, 21: 160–170.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0202 https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2014.0187
59. Nasatto P, Pignon F, Silveira J, et al., 2015, Methylcellulose, 69. Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, Akkineni AR et al, 2020, 3D Bioprinting
a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and of osteochondral tissue substitutes – in vitro-chondrogenesis
extended applications. Polymers, 7: 777–803. in multi-layered mineralized constructs. Sci Rep, 10: 8277.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7050777 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65050-9
60. Kim MH, Kim BS, Park H, et al., 2018, Injectable 70. Ahlfeld T, Cubo-Mateo N, Cometta S, et al., 2020, A novel
methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate plasma-based bioink stimulates cell proliferation and
nanoparticles for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol, differentiation in bioprinted, mineralized constructs. ACS
109: 57–64. Appl Mater Interfaces, 12: 12557–12572.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.068 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c00710
61. Altomare L, Bonetti L, Campiglio CE, et al., 2018, 71. Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Rathan S, Hobbs C, et al., 2019,
Biopolymer-based strategies in the design of smart medical Pore-forming bioinks to enable spatio-temporally defined
devices and artificial organs. Int J Artif Organs, 41: 337–359. gene delivery in bioprinted tissues. JCR, 301: 13–27.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0391398818765323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.006

V
Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 227 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.637