Page 342 - IJB-9-1
P. 342

International Journal of Bioprinting                             Review on Hybrid Biomanufacturing Systems


            53.  Barraza B, Olate-Moya F, Montecinos G,  et al.,   hybrid  scaffold  with  synthetic  biomaterials and  hydrogel
               Superhydrophobic SLA 3D printed materials modified with   using solid freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication,
               nanoparticles biomimicking the hierarchical structure of a   3: 034102.
               rice leaf. Sci Technol Adv Mater, 23: 300–321.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034102
            54.  Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M,  et al., High‐resolution   66.  Kim JY, Lee TJ, Cho DW,  et al., 2010, Solid free-form
               projection microstereolithography for patterning of   fabrication-based PCL/HA scaffolds fabricated with a
               neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater, 5: 610–619.
                                                                  multi-head deposition system for bone tissue engineering.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500721             J Biomater sci Polym Ed, 21: 951–962.
            55.  Lee SJ, Zhu W, Heyburn L,  et al., 2016, Development of      https://doi.org/10.1163/156856209X458380
               novel 3-D printed scaffolds with core-shell nanoparticles for
               nerve regeneration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 64: 408–418.   67.  Landers R, Mülhaupt R, 2000, Desktop manufacturing
                                                                  of complex objects, prototypes and biomedical scaffolds
               https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2558493          by means of computer‐assisted design combined with
            56.  Luo Y, Le Fer G, Dean D, et al., 2019, 3D printing of poly   computer‐guided 3D plotting of polymers and reactive
               (propylene fumarate) oligomers: Evaluation of resin   oligomers. Macromol Mater Eng, 282: 17–21.
               viscosity, printing characteristics and mechanical properties.   68.  You  F,  Wu  X,  Zhu  N,  et al., 2016, 3D printing of porous
               Biomacromolecules, 20: 1699–1708.                  cell-laden hydrogel constructs for potential applications
            57.  Dong D, Su H, Li X,  et al., 2022, Microstructures and   in cartilage tissue engineering.  ACS Biomater Sci
               mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate   Eng, 2: 1200–1210.
               bioceramics fabricated by SLA 3D printing.  J  Manuf   69.  Jain  S,  Fuoco  T,  Yassin  MA,  et al.,  2019,  Printability  and
               Processes, 81: 433–443.                            critical insight into polymer properties during direct-
            58.  Admane P, Gupta AC, Jois P,  et al., 2019, Direct 3D   extrusion based 3D printing of medical grade polylactide
               bioprinted full-thickness skin constructs recapitulate   and copolyesters. Biomacromolecules, 21: 388–396.
               regulatory signaling pathways and physiology of human   70.  Wei L, Wu S, Kuss M, et al., 2019, 3D printing of silk fibroin-
               skin. Bioprinting, 15: e00051.                     based hybrid scaffold treated with platelet rich plasma for
            59.  Norotte  C,  Marga  FS,  Niklason  LE,  et  al., 2009, Scaffold-  bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater, 4: 256–260.
               free vascular tissue engineering using biomanufacturing.      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.09.001
               Biomaterials, 30: 5910–5917.
                                                               71.  Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al., 2016, A 3D biomanufacturing
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034  system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with
            60.  Byambaa  B,  Annabi  N,  Yue  K,  et al., 2017, Bioprinted   structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34: 312–319.
               osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D   72.  Merceron TK, Burt M, Seol YJ, et al., 2015, A 3D bioprinted
               bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 1700015.        complex structure for engineering the muscle-tendon unit.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015             Biofabrication, 7: 035003.
            61.  Langer EM, Allen-Petersen BL, King SM,  et al, 2019,      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035003
               Modeling tumor phenotypes in vitro with three-dimensional   73.  Kim JH, Seol YJ, Ko IK, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinted human
               biomanufacturing. Cell Rep, 26: 608–623.           skeletal muscle constructs for muscle function restoration.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.090       Sci Rep, 8: 1–15.
            62.  Liu C, Xia Z, Han Z,  et al.,  2008,  Novel  3D  collagen   74.  Lee J, Kim KE, Bang S, et al., 2017, A desktop multi-material
               scaffolds  fabricated  by indirect printing technique for   3D  bio-printing system  with  open-source  hardware  and
               tissue engineering.  J  Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,   software. Int J Precision Eng Manuf, 18: 605–612.
               85: 519–528.                                    75.  Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY,  et al., 2012, Biomanufacturing
               https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30975                of a  mechanically enhanced three-dimensional  dual cell-
                                                                  laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using
            63.  Liu L, Yan Y, Xiong Z, 2007, A novel poly (lactic-co-glycolic
               acid)-collagen hybrid scaffold fabricated via multi-nozzle   a multi-head tissue/organ building system.  J  Micromech
               low-temperature deposition.  Virtual Rapid Manuf, 2019,   Microeng, 22: 085014.
               57–61.                                          76.  Jung JW, Lee JS, Cho DW, 2016, Computer-aided multiple-
                                                                  head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous
            64.  Kim JY, Cho DW, 2009, Blended PCL/PLGA scaffold   organ/tissue constructs. Sci Rep, 6: 21685.
               fabrication  using  multi-head  deposition  system.
               Microelectron Eng, 86: 1447–1450.                  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21685
            65.  Shim JH, Kim JY, Park M, et al., 2011, Development of a   77.  Ozbolat IT, Chen H, Yu Y, 2014, Development of ‘Multi-arm


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        334                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.646
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347