Page 343 - IJB-9-1
P. 343

International Journal of Bioprinting                             Review on Hybrid Biomanufacturing Systems


               Bioprinter’for hybrid biofabrication of tissue engineering   a 3D-printed polymeric cage. Tissue Eng Part  C Methods,
               constructs. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf, 30: 295–304.  22: 573–584.
            78.  Yu  Y, Moncal KK,  Li  J,  et al.,  2016, Three-dimensional      https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2016.0073
               biomanufacturing using self-assembling scalable scaffold-
               free “tissue strands” as a new bioink. Sci Rep, 6: 28714.  85.  Müller M, Öztürk E, Arlov Ø, et al., 2017, Alginate sulfate-
                                                                  nanocellulose bioinks for cartilage biomanufacturing
            79.  Moncal KK, Heo DN, Godzik KP, et al., 2018, 3D printing   applications. Ann Biomed Eng, 45: 210–223.
               of poly (ε-caprolactone)/poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)/
               hydroxyapatite  composite  constructs  for  bone  tissue      https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5
               engineering. J Mater Res, 33: 1972–1986.        86.  Sultan S, Siqueira G, Zimmermann T, et al., 2017, 3D printing
            80.  Schuurman W, Khristov V, Pot MW,  et al., 2011,   of nano-cellulosic biomaterials for medical applications.
               Biomanufacturing of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable   Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2: 29–34.
               mechanical properties. Biofabrication, 3: 021001.  87.  Liu S, Li L, 2017, Ultrastretchable and self-healing double-
            81.  Visser J, Peters B, Burger TJ, et al., 2013, Biofabrication   network hydrogel for 3D printing and strain sensor.  ACS
               of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs.   Appl Mater Interfaces, 9: 26429–26437.
               Biofabrication 5 (3):035007.
                                                               88.  Xu T, Binder KW, Albanna MZ, et al., 2012, Hybrid printing
            82.  Raphael B, Khalil T, Workman VL,  et al., 2017, 3D cell   of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for
               biomanufacturing  of  self-assembling  peptide-based  cartilage tissue  engineering applications.  Biofabrication,
               hydrogels. Mater Lett, 190: 103–106.               5: 015001.
            83.  Zhuang P, Ng WL, An J, et al., 2019, Layer-by-layer ultraviolet   89.  Huang  B, Aslan E,  Jiang Z,  Daskalakis E,  et al., 2020.
               assisted extrusion-based (UAE) biomanufacturing of   Engineered dual-scale poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using
               hydrogel constructs with high aspect ratio for soft tissue   3D printing and rotational electrospinning for bone tissue
               engineering applications. PLoS One, 14: e0216776.   regeneration. Addit Manufac, 36: 101452.
               https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216776    90.  Liu F, Wang W, Hinduja S,  et al., 2018, Hybrid additive
            84.  Visscher DO, Bos EJ, Peeters M, et al., 2016, Cartilage tissue   manufacturing system for zonal plasma treated scaffolds. 3D
               engineering:  preventing  tissue  scaffold  contraction  using   Print Addit Manuf, 5: 205–213.










































            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        335                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.646
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348