Page 146 - IJB-9-2
P. 146

International Journal of Bioprinting                          Hybrid biofabrication of neurosecretory structures



                          A                        B                       C









                          D                        E                       F










            Figure  8. Tissue remodeling of neurosecretory organoids. (A) Hybrid fabrication of neurosecretory structures transplanted  in vivo for 14  days.
            (B and C) Angiogenesis and lamellar organoid-like structure formation. (D–F) Spherical and sheet-like remodeling tissue structures.

            of the nanofibers as foreign bodies.  In the selection of   Acknowledgments
            raw materials for electrospinning, PLLA and gelatin with
            good  biocompatibility  are  preferred,  both  of  which  are   None.
            FDA-approved  biodegradable  polymer  materials  for  in   Funding
            vivo transplantation and have been proven to have good
            histocompatibility. When the pathological sections were   This study was supported by the Anhui Provincial Natural
            examined at high magnification, immune infiltration was   Science Foundation (2208085MH251), the Anhui Medical
            not obvious in the local areas where the biofabricated   University Scientific Research Fund (No. 2021xkj131), and
            structures were reconstructed to form a tissue-like body   the Basic and Clinical Cooperative Research and Promotion
            (Figure S3B–D). Therefore, we hypothesize that during   Program of Anhui Medical University (2022xkjT024).
            the early stage of tissue remodeling, immune infiltration
            may be involved in the process of tissue remodeling   Conflict of interest
            and angiogenesis. We speculate that the neurosecretory   The authors declare no competing financial interest.
            structures produced by hybrid biofabrication can self-
            assemble  in vivo for tissue remodeling and construct   Author contributions
            functional vascularized structures.
                                                               Conceptualization: Hongwei Cheng, Qing Lan
            4. Conclusion                                      Formal analysis: Xingliang Dai, Xuefeng Tian, Shengcai
                                                                  Gu, Peng Gao
            The neurosecretory tissue-like structures were prepared by   Investigation: Xingliang Dai, Xuefeng Tian, Shengcai Gu,
            combining extrusion 3D bioprinting and electrospinning   Peng Gao
            technology  in vitro, using sodium alginate/gelatin/  Methodology: Xingliang Dai, Xuefeng Tian, Shengcai Gu,
            fibrinogen  as  the matrix composition  and supporting   Peng Gao
            structure. The overall mechanical strength and structural
            stability of the hydrogel scaffolds were increased by the   Supervision: Hongwei Cheng, Qing Lan
            superimposition of PLLA/gelatin electrospun nanofibers.   Writing – original draft: Xingliang Dai, Xuefeng Tian, Yafei
            The  results  showed  that  the  neurosecretory  cells  had   Yang, Huaixu Li, Peng Gao
            high activity and maintained their original secretory   Writing – review and editing: Hongwei Cheng, Qing Lan
            function  in vitro and showed high growth activity,   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            self-assembly vascularization, and  tissue remodeling
            potential after transplantation in vivo. This new method   The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in
            allows for the biological manufacture of neurosecretory   ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity
            structures in vitro as well as provides a new engineering   of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and
            manufacturing platform for hormone substitution research   resolved. All animal experiments were conducted under
            of neurosecretory structures.                      the supervision of the Animal Research Ethics Committee


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        138                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.659
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151