Page 171 - IJB-9-2
P. 171

International Journal of Bioprinting                          3D Printing Multifunctional Orthopedic Biocoatings



                         A                                          B






















                                       Figure 2. (A) Jetting parameters. (B) Single monodisperse droplet.



            jetting parameters. Jetting parameters were optimized for
            droplet consistency, and the final jetting parameters were
            obtained at a reservoir pressure of −24 psi, peak voltage
            (Vpeak) of 36 V, period of 77 µs, and frequency of 300 Hz,
            as shown in Figure 2A. Figure 2B shows a monodisperse
            PCL/ACP solution drop being jetted from a 50 µm nozzle
            orifice.
              The rheological properties of the coating inks
            were measured to evaluate their printability using the
            customized inkjet printer. Figure 3 shows the variation in
            the Z number for different inks in this research. As can be
            seen, a reduction of Z number was observed as the ACP
            content increased for both PLGA and PCL polymers due   Figure 3. Printability of different composite polymer inks using Z number.
            to increase in the viscosity of the inks. Furthermore, PCL
            virgin ink had higher viscosity as compared to PLGA   A                    B
            virgin ink due to higher molecular weight and long-range
            chains. However, it is noteworthy to point out that all the
            inks were within the jettability range of Z number – 1–10
            without forming satellites.
            3.2. Coating integrity and morphological
            characterization
                                                               C                       D
            The  coating  uniformity  and surface  morphology  of
            the fabricated polymeric coatings were analyzed using
            optical microscopy and SEM, respectively. Under optical
            microscopy, PCL-ACP coatings displayed uniform
            deposition patterns and adherence with the Ti alloy
            substrate, as shown in Figure 4A and B. However, PLGA-
            ACP coatings had random deposition patterns, as depicted
            in Figure 4C and D. The PLGA-ACP coatings show spots   Figure  4.  Optical microscopy of (A) Ti-1%PCL-0.5%ACP, (B)
                                                               Ti-1%PCL-1%ACP, (C) Ti-1%PLGA-1%ACP, and (D) Ti-1%PLGA-
            on the Ti alloy substrate, which represent regions coated   0.5%ACP. Ti: Titanium, ACP: Amorphous calcium phosphate, PCL:
            with bare PLGA polymer without the presence of ACP.   Polycaprolactone, PLGA: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid.


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        163                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.661
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176