Page 296 - IJB-9-2
P. 296

International Journal of Bioprinting                                    Methodology of hydrogel printability






































                            Figure 8. Simultaneous performance of the grid test and quantitative assessment of the gelation state.


            can be obtained. The rest of the tests of the methodology   printability of a hydrogel can be measured on the basis of
            are based on previous characterization.            the circularity of the squares of a matrix of squares. The
                                                               closer the squares of the matrix to the shape of a perfect
               The proposed methodology starts with the sessile drop
            method. In this method, the contact angle generated by a   square, the closer the value is to 1. With excessive gelation,
                                                               the result will be greater than 1, while with poor gelation,
            hydrogel drop on the surface on which it is deposited is   the result will be less than 1. On the other hand, the grid test
            measured. This angle can provide data on the wettability   measures printability in terms of the degree of similarity of
            of the hydrogel and therefore whether it has sufficient   the surface area in mm  of the squares of a bioprinted grid
                                                                                 2
            moisture conditions to allow cell viability. With the data   (real value) to that of the squares of the digitally designed
            obtained from this test, the hydrogels that do not have   version (theoretical value). Thus, when comparing the two
            an adequate wettability to allow cell viability due to their   data, lower standard deviation indicates higher printability.
            concentration or composition can be discarded.
                                                               As both tests are based on the measurement of parameters
               Once the wettability of the hydrogels has been   related to squares, it has been proposed that both tests
            determined and therefore, those with the best wettability   should be jointly carried out while printing a grid on which
            properties for cell survival have been selected, the filament   the surface area of its squares is measured for subsequent
            collapse test can be performed. With this test, the stability of   comparison with its digital version and the circularity of
            the filament can be checked by measuring the deflection at   the squares is measured.
            mid-span of a suspended bioink filament , and the speed
                                            [30]
            parameter can be adjusted. This test can be used to compare   Cell viability tests can be performed after choosing
            different hydrogels and to compare different concentrations   the hydrogel with the best results using different viability
            of the same hydrogel, allowing the selection of a combination   tests, such as the live/dead test that uses calcein-AM and
                                                                                 [31]
            of optimum printing requirements in each case.     propidium iodide (PI) . After performing the different
                                                               tests proposed, it is possible to determine which hydrogel
               After performing the filament collapse test, the   is best suited to the required printability parameters. In
            quantitative assessment of the gelation state and the   this case, the bioprinting conditions for each hydrogel have
            printing grid test can be performed together. With   been adapted to have the best possible printability at 37°C
            the quantitative assessment of the gelation state, the   to allow cell-loaded printing.


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        288                     https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.667
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301