Page 124 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting OMT-loaded spinal cord scaffold

Consent for publication 10. Gedde MH, Lilleberg HS, Assmus J, et al., 2019, Traumatic
vs non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A comparison of
Not applicable. primary rehabilitation outcomes and complications during
hospitalization. J Spinal Cord Med, 42(6):695–701.
Availability of data
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1598698
The data that support the findings of this study are available 11. Haddad AF, 2021, The natural history of spinal cord injury.
from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 32(3):315–321.

References https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2021.03.003
12. Fan B, Wei Z, Yao X, et al., 2018, Microenvironment
1. Wyndaele M, 2006, Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology imbalance of spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant, 27(6):
of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature 853–866.
survey? Spinal Cord, 44(9):523–529.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689718755778
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101893
13. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, et al., 2018, 3D
2. Scivoletto G, Miscusi M, Forcato S, et al., 2017, The bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine.
rehabilitation of spinal cord injury patients in Europe. Acta Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:296–332.
Neurochir Suppl, 124:203–210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_31
14. Luo Y, 2018, 3D bioprinting of artificial tissues:
3. Rupp R, 2020, Spinal cord lesions. Handb Clin Neurol, Construction of biomimetic microstructures. Macromol
168:51–65. Biosci, 18(6):e1800034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63934-9.00006-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800034
4. Guo S, 2021, Spinal cord repair: From cells and tissue 15. Junka R, 2020, Acellular polycaprolactone scaffolds laden
engineering to extracellular vesicles. Cells, 10(8):1872. with fibroblast/endothelial cell-derived extracellular matrix
for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A, 108(2):
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081872
351–364.
5. Shi Z, Yuan S, Shi L, et al., 2021, Programmed cell death
in spinal cord injury pathogenesis and therapy. Cell Prolif, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36821
54(3):e12992. 16. He J, Li Z, Yu T, et al., 2020, Preparation and evaluation of
https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12992 acellular sheep periostea for guided bone regeneration. J
Biomed Mater Res A, 108(1):19–29.
6. Chen X, Wang Y, Zhou G, et al., 2021, The combination
of nanoscaffolds and stem cell transplantation: Paving a https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36787
promising road for spinal cord injury regeneration. Biomed 17. Gong M, Sun J, Liu G, et al., 2021, Graphene oxide-modified
Pharmacother, 143:112233. 3D acellular cartilage extracellular matrix scaffold for
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112233 cartilage regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
119:111603.
7. Zawadzka M, Kwasniewska A, Miazga K, et al., 2021,
Perspectives in the cell-based therapies of various aspects of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111603
the spinal cord injury-associated pathologies: Lessons from 18. Zhao Y, Zhao X, Zhang R, et al., 2020, Cartilage extracellular
the animal models. Cells, 10(11):2995. matrix scaffold with kartogenin-encapsulated PLGA
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112995 microspheres for cartilage regeneration. Front Bioeng
Biotechnol, 8:600103.
8. Xiao Z, Tang F, Zhao Y, et al., 2018, Significant improvement
of acute complete spinal cord injury patients diagnosed by https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.600103
a combined criteria implanted with neuroregen scaffolds 19. Urciuolo A, 2018, Decellularized tissue for muscle
and mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant, 27(6): regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 19(8):2392.
907–915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082392
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689718766279
20. Dhasmana A, Singh L, Roy P, et al., 2019, Silk fibroin protein
9. Zhang Y, Al MA, Yuan Y, et al., 2021, Acute spinal cord modified acellular dermal matrix for tissue repairing and
injury: Pathophysiology and pharmacological intervention regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 97:313–324.
(Review). Mol Med Rep, 23(6):417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.038
https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.12056

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 116 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.692