Page 166 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting LPBF of AKM/PEEK biological composite

27. Chen P, Cai H, Li Z, et al., 2020, Crystallization kinetics of 38. Huang Y, Jin X, Zhang X, et al., 2009, In vitro and in vivo
polyetheretherketone during high temperature-selective evaluation of akermanite bioceramics for bone regeneration.
laser sintering. Addit Manuf, 36:101615. Biomaterials, 30(28):5041–5048.
28. Torstrick FB, Lin ASP, Potter D, et al., 2018, Porous PEEK 39. Wu C, Chang J, Zhai W, et al., 2006, Porous akermanite
improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma- scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Preparation,
sprayed titanium coating on PEEK. Biomaterials 185:106–116. characterization, and in vitro studies. J Biomed Mater Res
Part B Appl Biomater, 78B(1):47–55.
29. Almasi D, Iqbal N, Sadeghi M, et al., 2016, Preparation
methods for improving PEEK’s bioactivity for orthopedic and 40. Duman Ş, Bulut B, 2021, Effect of akermanite powders
dental application: A review. Int J Biomater, 2016:8202653. on mechanical properties and bioactivity of chitosan-
based scaffolds produced by 3D-bioprinting. Ceram Int,
30. Ma R, Tang T, 2014, Current strategies to improve the 47(10):13912–13921.
bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci, 15(4):5426–5445.
41. Zhai W, Lu H, Chen L, et al., 2012, Silicate bioceramics
31. Vaezi M, Black C, Gibbs DMR, et al., 2016, Characterization induce angiogenesis during bone regeneration. Acta
of new PEEK/HA composites with 3D HA network Biomater, 8(1):341–349.
fabricated by extrusion freeforming. Molecules 21(6):687.
42. Chen P, Cai H, Li Z, et al., 2018, Crystallization kinetics of
32. Von Wilmonsky C, Lutz R, Meisel U, et al., 2009, In vivo polyetheretherketone during high temperature-selective
evaluation of ß-TCP containing 3D laser sintered poly(ether laser sintering. Addit Manuf, 36:101615.
ether ketone) composites in pigs. J Bioact Compat Polym, 43. Chen P, Wu H, Zhu W, et al., 2018, Investigation into the
24(2):169–184.
processability, recyclability and crystalline structure of
33. Ma R, Yu Z, Tang S, et al., 2016, Osseointegration of selective laser sintered Polyamide 6 in comparison with
nanohydroxyapatite- or nano-calcium silicate-incorporated Polyamide 12. Polym Test, 69:366–374.
polyetheretherketone bioactive composites in vivo. Int J 44. Chen P, Su J, Wang H, et al., 2022, Aging mechanism of
Nanomed, 11:6023–6033. polyetheretherketone powder during layer-wise infrared
34. Wang H, Chen P, Shu Z, et al., 2023, Laser powder bed fusion radiation of high-temperature laser powder bed fusion.
of poly-ether-ether-ketone/bioactive glass composites: Mater Des, 213:110348.
Processability, mechanical properties, and bioactivity. 45. Zhu W, Yan C, Shi Y, et al., 2015, Investigation into
Compos Sci Technol, 231:109805. mechanical and microstructural properties of polypropylene
35. Yuan S, Shen F, Chua CK, et al., 2019, Polymeric composites manufactured by selective laser sintering in comparison
for powder-based additive manufacturing: Materials and with injection molding counterparts. Mater Des, 82:37–45.
applications. Progr Polym Sci, 91:141–168. 46. Li Y, Liu C, 2017, Nanomaterial-based bone regeneration.
36. Mohammadi H, Baba Ismail YM, Bin Shariff KA, et al., Nanoscale, 9(15):4862–4874.
2018, Synthesis and characterization of Akermanite by 47. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, et al., 2009, Ti
mechanical milling and subsequent heat treatment. J Phys based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic
Conf Series, 1082:012021. implants—A review. Progr Mater Sci, 54(3):397–425.
37. Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, et al., 2008, Reconstruction of calvarial 48. Su J, Hua S, Chen A, et al., 2022, Three-dimensional printing
defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive of gyroid-structured composite bioceramic scaffolds with
ceramics. Biomaterials, 29(17):2588–2596. tuneable degradability. Biomater Adv, 133:112595.

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 158 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.699