Page 172 - IJB-9-3
P. 172

International Journal of Bioprinting                  Flow performance of porous implants with different geometry





































                                 Figure 6. Fitting curves between shape parameter and porosity: (a) OT; (b) G; and (c) P.
            Table 3. Shape parameters of porous scaffolds

             Structure type  Unit cell size   Structure   Model size   Characteristic   Porosity   Surface area   Specific surface
                           (mm)       model     (mm)          parameter (Φ )  (%)   (mm )      area (mm )
                                                                                        2
                                                                                                      -1
                                                                     i
             Line          5 × 5 × 5  OT-40     15 × 15 × 30  Φ  (mm)  1.36  40     9390.23    3.48
                                                             1
                                      OT-50                         1.20    50      9533.54    2.82
                                      OT-60                         1.04    60      9337.13    3.46
                                      OT-70                         0.87    70      8758.18    4.33
             Surface       5 × 5 × 5  G-40      15 × 15 × 30  Φ  (mm)  1.01  40     8209.67    2.03
                                                             2
                                      G-50                          0.83    50      8437.49    2.50
                                      G-60                          0.66    60      8569.94    3.17
                                      G-70                          0.49    70      8634.64    4.26
             Body          5 × 5 × 5  P-40      15 × 15 × 30  Φ     0.35    40      3718.86    0.92
                                                             3
                                      P-50                          0       50      3595.91    1.07
                                      P-60                          -0.35   60      3371.41    1.25
                                      P-70                          -0.70   70      3010.61    1.49

            of thickness reduces the cross-sectional area, leading to   For the  same type  of structure, with the increase of
            the  decrease  of  the  support  volume  and  the  increase  of   porosity, the surface area changed slightly, while the specific
            porosity, and this correspondence was applicable to all line   surface area increased significantly, as shown in Figure 7,
            and surface structures. For P scaffolds, as a specific TPMS   in which the type of error is the standard error. When the
            volume structure, the changes in volume could be achieved   strut size is small, that is, the porosity is large, the reduction
            by changing only one parameter and the relationship   of surface area caused by the coincidence of volume at the
            between porosity and this parameter was linear. Thus,   joint of the strut is negligible compared with the increase
            quantitative design for three types of porous structures was   of  surface  area  caused  by  the  increase  of  strut  size.  As
            feasible so that the porosity and other physical parameters,   porosity decreases, the relationship gradually reverses. The
            respectively, were completely controllable.        OT structure with 40% porosity showed an abnormal trend


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        164                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.700
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177