Page 205 - IJB-9-3
P. 205

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3D-printed vascularized biofunctional scaffold



            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Zhang YB, Liu XC, Zeng LD, et al., 2019, Polymer fiber
                                                                  scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.  Adv
            The authors thank the funding support from the General   Funct Mater, 29(36):1903279.
            program of NSFC (81972058) and Shanghai Key Clinical
            Specialty Construction Project - Biomedical Materials   https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903279
            (shslczdzk06701),  Three-year  Action  Plan  of  Shenkang   3.   Zheng CC, Attarilar S, Li K, et al., 2021, 3D-printed HA15-
            Development Center (SHDC2020CR2019B), Huangpu         loaded beta-tricalcium phosphate/poly (lactic-co-glycolic
            District Industrial Support Fund (XK2020009), National   acid) bone tissue scaffold promotes bone regeneration in
            Key Science and Technology Infrastructure of Translational   rabbit radial defects. Int J Bioprint, 7(1):100–111.
            Medicine (Shanghai)  Open  Project  (TMSZ-2020-207),   https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i1.317
            Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Innovative   4.   Li Y, Xie KG, Wang C, et al., 2021, 3D printing of tricalcium
            Orthopedic Instruments and Personalized Medicine      phosphate/poly lactic-co-glycolic acid. Scaffolds loaded
            (19DZ2250200),  Shanghai  Science and  Technology     with carfilzomib for treating critical-sized rabbit radial bone
            Commission Yangtze River Delta Science and Technology   defects. Int J Bioprint, 7(4):99–111.
            Innovation Community Project (21002411200), and       https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.405
            Technical Standard Project of Shanghai Science and
            Technology Commission (21DZ2201500).               5.   Lin ZF, Wu MM, He HM,  et al., 2019, 3D printing of
                                                                  mechanically stable calcium-free alginate-based scaffolds
            Conflict of interest                                  with tunable surface charge to enable cell adhesion and
                                                                  facile biofunctionalization. Adv Funct Mater, 29(9):1808439.
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808439

            Author contributions                               6.   Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, et al., 2019, A definition
                                                                  of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks.
            Conceptualization: Bojun Cao, Yongqiang Hao           Biofabrication, 11(1):013001.
            Investigation: Bojun Cao, Jieming Lin, Jia Tan, Jiaxin Li,   https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52
               Zhaoyang Ran, Liang Deng
            Methodology: Yongqiang Hao, Jieming Lin            7.   Zhang  S,  Chen  J,  Yu  Y, et al.,  2019,  Accelerated  bone
            Supervision: Yongqiang Hao                            regenerative efficiency by regulating sequential release of
            Writing – original draft: Bojun Cao                   BMP-2 and VEGF and synergism with sulfated chitosan.
                                                                  ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5(4):1944–1955.
            Writing – review & editing: Bojun Cao, Yongqiang Hao
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01490
               The manuscript is approved by all authors for
            publication.                                       8.   Kempen DH, Lu L, Heijink A, et al., 2009, Effect of
                                                                  local sequential VEGF and BMP-2 delivery on ectopic
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            and orthotopic bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 30(14):
                                                                  2816–2825.
            All protocols involving experimental animals were     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.031
            approved by the Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of the
            Ninth  People’s  Hospital Affiliated  to  Shanghai Jiaotong   9.   Geuze RE, Theyse LF, Kempen DH, et al., 2012, A differential
            University School of Medicine (SH9H-2019-A717-1).     effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and vascular
                                                                  endothelial growth factor release timing on osteogenesis at
            Consent for publication                               ectopic and orthotopic sites in a large-animal model. Tissue
                                                                  Eng Part A, 18(19-20):2052–2062.
            Not applicable.                                       https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0560

            Availability of data                               10.  Wei S, Xu P, Yao Z, et al., 2021, A composite hydrogel with
                                                                  co-delivery of antimicrobial peptides and platelet-rich
            Data will be made available on request.               plasma to enhance healing of infected wounds in diabetes.
                                                                  Acta Biomater, 124:205–218.
            References                                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.046

            1.   Armiento AR, Hatt LP, Rosenberg GS, et al., 2020, Functional   11.  Singh M, Nanda HS, Lee JYH, et al., 2020, Photocurable
               biomaterials for bone regeneration: A lesson in complex   platelet rich plasma bioadhesives.  Acta Biomater, 117:
               biology. Adv Funct Mater, 30(44):1909874.          133–141.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909874             https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.030



            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        197                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.702
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210