Page 207 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed vascularized biofunctional scaffold

32. Shao H, Liu A, Ke X, et al., 2017, 3D robocasting magnesium- macrophage polarization in a rabbit model. Acta Biomater,
doped wollastonite/TCP bioceramic scaffolds with improved 128:150–162.
bone regeneration capacity in critical sized calvarial defects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.010
J Mater Chem B, 5(16):2941–2951.
39. Zhao M, Wang J, Zhang JX, et al., 2022, Functionalizing
https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb00217c multi-component bioink with platelet-rich plasma for
33. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al., 2020, Progress in customized in-situ bilayer bioprinting for wound healing.
3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative Mater Today Bio, 16:100334.
engineering. Biomaterials, 226:119536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 40. Gaharwar AK, Mihaila SM, Swami A, et al., 2013, Bioactive
silicate nanoplatelets for osteogenic differentiation of human
34. Epstein NE, 2013, Complications due to the use of BMP/ mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Mater, 25(24):3329–3336.
INFUSE in spine surgery: The evidence continues to mount.
Surg Neurol Int, 4(Suppl 5):S343–S352. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300584
https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.114813 41. Stegen S, van Gastel N, Carmeliet G, 2015, Bringing new life
to damaged bone: The importance of angiogenesis in bone
35. Shields LB, Raque GH, Glassman SD, et al., 2006, Adverse repair and regeneration. Bone, 70:19–27.
effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone
morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.017
fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31(5):542–547. 42. Klopfleisch R, Jung F, 2017, The pathology of the foreign
body reaction against biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A,
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201424.27509.72
105(3):927–940.
36. Lee K, Silva EA, Mooney DJ, 2011, Growth factor delivery- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35958
based tissue engineering: General approaches and a review
of recent developments. J R Soc Interface, 8(55):153–170. 43. Brown BN, Badylak SF, 2013, Expanded applications,
shifting paradigms and an improved understanding of host-
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0223 biomaterial interactions. Acta Biomater, 9(2):4948–4955.
37. Liu KT, Zhao M, Li Y, et al., 2022, VEGF loaded porcine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.025
decellularized adipose tissue derived hydrogel could 44. Papait A, Cancedda R, Mastrogiacomo M, et al., 2018,
enhance angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Biomater Sci Allogeneic platelet-rich plasma affects monocyte
Poly Ed, 33(5):569–589.
differentiation to dendritic cells causing an anti-
https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.2002235 inflammatory microenvironment, putatively fostering
wound healing. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 12(1):30–43.
38. Jiang GY, Li SH, Yu K, et al., 2021, A 3D-printed PRP-GelMA
hydrogel promotes osteochondral regeneration through M2 https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2361

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 199 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.702