Page 201 - IJB-9-3
P. 201

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3D-printed vascularized biofunctional scaffold












































            Figure 5. Effect of hydrogels on HUVEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. (A) Effect on the proliferation of HUVEC (n = 3/group). (B) The
            effect of each group of hydrogels on HUVEC migration as determined by scratch-wound assay. The number of migrating cells was quantified and shown
            in (C); n = 4/group. (D) The effect of each group of hydrogels on HUVEC migration as determined by Boyden chamber assay. The number of migrating
            cells was quantified and shown in (E); n = 3/group. (F) Effect on HUVEC tubule formation. (G) Relative number of tubule formation (n = 3/group). All
            experiments were replicated three times. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

            those in the PRP-GA group (Figure 5F and G). These results   3.7. Vascularization effect of 3D-printed
            demonstrated the potential pro-angiogenic properties of   biofunctional scaffolds in vivo
            the PRP-GA@Lap hydrogel.                           We next used 3D-printed PCL and each group of hydrogel
                                                               bioinks layer-by-layer to construct bone defect repair
            3.6. Effect of hydrogels on macrophage             scaffolds  (Figure  7A),  and examined  the  compression
            polarization in vitro
            We cultured RAW264.7 cells on each group of hydrogels   modulus of pure PCL scaffolds and PRP-GA@Lap/PCL
            to determine their effect on macrophage polarization. The   scaffolds (Figure S1). The scaffolds of each group were
            qPCR results showed that the expression of iNOS and   then implanted subcutaneously in the backs of rats to
            CCR7 (M1 marker) genes was decreased in cells cultured   assess the vascularization effect of the scaffolds  in vivo
            on PRP-GA and PRP-GA@Lap hydrogels compared to the   (Figure 7B). Four weeks after implantation, the number
            pure GA group (Figure 6A and B), while the expression   of vessel formation in the PRP-GA@Lap/PCL group was
            of Arg1 and CD206 (M2 marker) genes was increased   markedly higher than the other two groups as observed
            (Figure 6C and D). In addition, the immunofluorescence   by HE staining (Figure 7C and D). Moreover, the vessels
            staining results were consistent with the qPCR results   in the PRP-GA@Lap/PCL group were more mature,
            (Figure 6E and  F). These results demonstrated that   and in addition to the presence of erythrocyte perfusion
            both sets of hydrogels containing PRP could promote   (Figure 7C), we found that the PRP-GA@Lap/PCL group
            macrophage polarization to M2.                     also had α-smooth muscle  actin (α-SMA)  and  CD31





            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        193                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.702
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206