Page 38 - IJB-9-3
P. 38

International Journal of Bioprinting                           Comparison of different 3D printing technologies



               Although this test is not decisive to know if the hydrogel   Table 1. Contact angle results for the hydrogels studied
            is going to present a correct cell viability, it does show us, at   Material  Temperature (°C)  Contact angle (°)
            a low economic cost, other interesting characteristics:
                                                                GelMA 5%      Ambient          116
              (i)  Pressure  that needs  to be  applied for a  drop of
                 hydrogel to be released. The greater the amount of           30               54
                 pressure generated, the greater the original forces          40               51
                 inside the syringe, so cell survival may be reduced.  GelMA 10%  Ambient      120
             (ii)  Viscosity of the hydrogel. Although this test does         30               109
                 not allow us to quantify the viscosity of the hydrogel       40               37
                 or its gelation, it does allow us to visually predict   ColMA (Cs = 5)  9     32
                 which hydrogels are going to present a greater state         15               31
                 of gelation. This is a very important characteristic to   ColMA (Cs = 10)  9  45
                 obtain a correct printability.                               15               46
            (iii)  Hydrogel wettability. It is related to cell adhesion and   HAMA 5%  9       46
                 spreading .                                                  Ambient          42
                        [32]
               Table 1 shows the results obtained.                            30               40
               Both Matrigel and ColMA with different concentrations          40               40
            could not be analyzed at the temperature of 25°C in the   Matrigel  9              45
            room where the experiment was carried out, as both                15               48
            crosslink at a temperature above 15°C. Ten percent GelMA
            at a temperature of 40°C showed an interesting contact   performing  the sessile  drop  method  and when  using  it
            angle, but a printing temperature above 37°C would subject   as a bioink in the bioprinter. Due to its low bioprinting
            the cells to high stress leading to cell death. Collagen-based   temperature, this hydrogel is not suitable for cell-loaded
            materials had very low viscosity above 30°C, which made   bioprinting, but the good results obtained in the sessile
            them difficult to bioprint. Therefore, their combination   drop method indicate that it is suitable for subsequent
            with other materials should be considered.         loading of cells into the bioprinter-generated structure,
                                                               because the contact angles are between 35° and 80°.
               In view of the results in Table 1, the most interesting
            hydrogels for obtaining good viability and cell proliferation   3.2.2. Filament collapse test
            are 5% GelMA, ColMA with a target concentration of   The aim of this test is to analyze the deflection of the
            10 mg/mL, 5% HAMA, and Matrigel, so the rest of the   hydrogel filament to be analyzed for different distances.
            hydrogels, because they presented worse characteristics in   For this purpose, a platform has been developed with the
            this first test, were discarded in this study.     same dimensions as a Petri dish, made up of pillars that are
               Matrigel is a material that requires low temperature for   progressively spaced one unit apart (Figure 3).
            its  maintenance,  as  it  polymerizes  at  room  temperature.   This  platform  was  designed using Inventor,  printed
            Therefore, its temperature must be low both when   with PLA, and coated with resin. This platform, designed





















                               Figure 3. Design of the platform for the collapse test using Inventor. Source: own elaboration.

            Volume 9 Issue3 (2023)                          30                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.680
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43