Page 398 - IJB-9-4
P. 398

International Journal of Bioprinting                 Impingement shear stress during microvalve-based bioprinting



            Table 2. Ligament pinch-off time, Reynolds, Weber, and   inside the alginate and between alginate and platform
            Ohnesorge numbers at different upstream pressures for both   until a stationary droplet stabilizes on the platform. The
            nozzle sizes                                       spatial distribution of impingement shear stress on the

                               D = 150 µm                      platform for the case of D = 300 µm and P = 1.0 bar is
             P (Pa)  Pinch-off   Re max  Re min  We  Oh max  Oh min  presented as a contour plot in Figure S1a (Supplementary
                   time (µs)                                   File) at three selected time points of 460, 500, and 600 µs
             0.8   No pinch-off  5.56  0.53  3.72  3.64  0.35  after opening of the nozzle. The contour plot shows that
                                                               the maximum of impingement shear stress occurs at the
             1.2   920–930     8.56  0.81  8.80  3.64  0.35    proximity of the stagnation point at the beginning of
             1.8   820–830    12.73  1.21  19.47  3.64  0.35   impingement.  In  Figure S1b  (Supplementary  File),  the
             2.4   790–800    16.66  1.59  33.34  3.64  0.35   dispensing dynamics captured by high-speed camera and
             3.0   750–760    20.40  1.94  50.01  3.64  0.35   resulting from the simulation are plotted together with
                               D = 300 µm                      nozzle and impingement wall shear stress during 2000 µs.
             P (Pa)  Pinch-off   Re max  Re min  We  Oh max  Oh min  Figure 6c and d shows the maximum shear stress on the
                   time (µs)                                   platform versus time for 150-µm and 300-µm nozzles,
             0.3   No pinch-off  25.04  2.38  37.65  2.57  0.25  respectively. As is shown, for each of the upstream
                                                               pressures at first, the shear stress on the platform was
             0.4   1700–1710  34.45  3.28  71.29  2.57  0.25   zero, which then increased suddenly to a maximum level
             0.6   1660–1670  50.71  4.83  154.44  2.57  0.25  (when the droplet impinged on the platform), and then,
             0.8   1660–1670  64.52  6.14  250.02  2.57  0.25  it decreased over time as the droplet was spreading on the
             1.0   1710–1720  82.49  7.86  408.68  2.57  0.25  platform surface. The impingement shear stress increased
            The pinch-off time represents the time when the ligament detached   by pressure in a non-linear fashion. Surprisingly, the ratio
            from the nozzle. The dimensionless parameters were calculated based   between the maximum shear stress on the platform and
            on the alginate average velocity at the outlet of nozzle at t = 400 μs.. The   the maximum wall shear stress in the nozzle increased
            zero shear viscosity of 0.315 Pa·s and infinite shear viscosity of 0.03 Pa·s   by upstream pressure (Figure  6e and  f). This indicates
            and a surface tension of 0.05 N·m  were used.
                                 -1





























            Figure 5. Weber number calculated by average alginate velocity at the outlet of nozzle in comparison to that calculated by droplet lead-point speed for
            (a) 150-µm and (b) 300-µm microvalves at different upstream pressure. The We increases with increasing hydrostatic pressure. As upstream pressure
            increases, the difference between the two calculated numbers is magnified.







            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        390                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.743
   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403