Page 116 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Application and prospects of 3D printable microgels

and biochemical cues to attenuate cardiac fibrosis after 100. Askari M, Naniz MA, Kouhi M, et al., 2021, Recent progress
myocardial infarction. Biomaterials, 169:11–21. in extrusion 3D bioprinting of hydrogel biomaterials for
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.042 tissue regeneration: A comprehensive review with focus on
advanced fabrication techniques. Biomater Sci, 9:535–573.
88. Sideris E, Griffin DR, Ding Y, et al., 2016, Particle hydrogels
based on hyaluronic acid building blocks. ACS Biomater Sci https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00973C
Eng, 2:2034–2041. 101. Mohan TS, Datta P, Nesaei S, et al., 2022, 3D coaxial
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00444 bioprinting: Process mechanisms, bioinks and applications.
Prog Biomed Eng, 4:022003.
89. Seymour AJ, Shin S, Heilshorn SC, 2021, 3D printing of
microgel scaffolds with tunable void fraction to promote cell https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac631c
infiltration. Adv Healthc Mater, 10:e2100644. 102. Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016, Design and printing strategies
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100644 in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: A review. Adv Healthc
Mater, 5:2856–2865.
90. Dumont CM, Carlson MA, Munsell MK, et al., 2019,
Aligned hydrogel tubes guide regeneration following spinal https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435
cord injury. Acta Biomater, 86:312–322. 103. Luo Y, Lode A, Gelinsky M, 2013, Direct plotting of three-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.052 dimensional hollow fiber scaffolds based on concentrated
alginate pastes for tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater,
91. Hu Z, Ma C, Rong X, et al., 2018, Immunomodulatory 2:777–783.
ECM-like microspheres for accelerated bone regeneration in
diabetes mellitus. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:2377–2390. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200303
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18458 104. Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, et al., 2012, Rapid
3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically
92. Hoare TR, Kohane DS, 2008, Hydrogels in drug delivery: heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds.
Progress and challenges. Polymer, 49:1993–2007.
Biofabrication, 4:035005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005
93. Li J, Mooney DJ, 2016, Designing hydrogels for controlled 105. Ouyang L, Yao R, Chen X, et al., 2015, 3D printing of HEK
drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater, 1:16071.
293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs
https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 with high cell viability and normal biological functions.
94. Bi D, Zhang J, Chakraborty B, et al., 2011, Jamming by shear. Biofabrication, 7:015010.
Nature, 480:355–358. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015010
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10667 106. Feng Q, Gao H, Wen H, et al., 2020, Engineering the
95. Menut P, Seiffert S, Sprakel J, et al., 2012, Does size matter? cellular mechanical microenvironment to regulate stem
Elasticity of compressed suspensions of colloidal- and cell chondrogenesis: Insights from a microgel model. Acta
granular-scale microgels. Soft Matter, 8:156–164. Biomater, 113:393–406.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SM06355C https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.046
96. Flégeau K, Puiggali-Jou A, Zenobi-Wong M, 2022, Cartilage 107. Kharkar PM, Kiick KL, Kloxin AM, 2015, Design of thiol-
tissue engineering by extrusion bioprinting utilizing porous and light-sensitive degradable hydrogels using Michael-
hyaluronic acid microgel bioinks. Biofabrication, 14. type addition reactions. Polym Chem, 6:5565–5574.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac6b58 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00750J
97. Kessel B, Lee M, Bonato A, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinting 108. Madl CM, LeSavage BL, Dewi RE, et al., 2017, Maintenance
of macroporous materials based on entangled hydrogel of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires
microstrands. Adv Sci (Weinh), 7:2001419. matrix remodelling. Nat Mater, 16:1233–1242.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001419 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat5020
98. Zhao D, Liu Y, Liu B, et al., 2021, 3D printing method for 109. Webber MJ, Appel EA, Meijer EW, et al., 2016,
tough multifunctional particle-based double-network Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat Mater, 15:13–26.
hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 13:13714–13723. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4474
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c01413 110. Zhu D, Wang H, Trinh P, et al., 2017, Elastin-like protein-
99. Caliari SR, Vega SL, Kwon M, et al., 2016, Dimensionality hyaluronic acid (ELP-HA) hydrogels with decoupled
and spreading influence MSC YAP/TAZ signaling in mechanical and biochemical cues for cartilage regeneration.
hydrogel environments. Biomaterials, 103:314–323. Biomaterials, 127:132–140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.061 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.010

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 108 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.753