Page 122 - IJB-9-5
        P. 122
     International Journal of Bioprinting                               DLP-printed scaffold for bone regeneration
            Figure 1. Schematic of GelMA/PMAA scaffolds for bone regeneration (ECO). The process of ECO facilitated by scaffolds consists of three key parts:
            chelation of iron ions, chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs, and vascular invasion.
            29°C. Kernel parameters of GelMA/6% PMAA scaffold:   2.4.4. Compressive tests
            layer height, 100 μm; light intensity, 10 mW/cm ; exposure   A compression test was performed on a printing scaffold
                                                  2
            time, 11 s; temperature, 29°C).                    (Ф10 mm × 5 mm) by the universal tensile machine (3365
                                                               Instron, USA) at room temperature. For the compression
            2.4. Characterization                              modulus, it was defined as an initial slope of line region
            2.4.1. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)            of the stress–strain curve. The mechanical indexes
            After dissolution of GelMA in D O, the degree of   (compressive stress and modulus) were acquired according
                                          2
            methacryloyl (DS) substitution of GelMA was quantified   to the software (n = 3).
            using  H NMR spectroscopy (400 MHz, Bruker, Germany).
                1
            An internal reference for the signal with δ = 4.79 ppm was   2.4.5. Swelling
            used, and tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as an internal   The different scaffolds were placed into PBS and soaked for
            standard. According to the previous study , the degree of   24 h at 37°C, and their weights (Ws) were measured after
                                             [44]
            substitution (DS) of methacrylate was obtained from the   sufficient swelling. Then, the scaffolds were freeze-dried
            1 H NMR spectrum of GelMA and calculated as:       to obtain their dry weight (Wd). The swelling ratio was
                                                               calculated as:
                    .
                   0 3462  I
               DS         55. ppm                     (I)                    Ws Wd
                   0 0380.  I                                     Swelling ratio                          (II)
                           1ppm                                                  Wd
            2.4.2. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
            The freeze-dried scaffolds were grinded into powder. Pure   2.4.6. Degradation
            gelatin and GelMA powders were used as the control   The different scaffolds were lyophilized, and their weights
            samples. FTIR spectra of the samples were obtained using   (W0) were measured. Then, the lyophilized scaffolds
            an FTIR spectrometer (TENSOR-27, Bruker, German)   were placed in PBS  solution and soaked at 37°C.  The
            scanned in the frequency range of 4000–500 cm  at a   PBS was changed every 2 days, and the samples were
                                                     -1
            scanning resolution of 2 cm  for 32 scans.         removed on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 21th,
                                  -1
                                                               27th,  33th,  39th,  45th,  51th,  54th,  and  55th  days.  After
            2.4.3 Microstructure of the 3D-printed hydrogel    rinsing twice with deionized water, the samples were
            scaffolds                                          lyophilized and weighed (Wt). The remaining weight was
            The scaffolds were observed using a scanning electron   calculated as:
            microscope (SEM, HITACHI, SU8100) after lyophilization
            (Quorum,  K850)  and  gold/palladium  sputter  coating   Remaining weight %    Wt  100%    (III)
            (HITACHI, MC1000).                                                        W0
            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        114                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.754
     	
