Page 150 - IJB-9-5
P. 150

International Journal of Bioprinting        3D printed PEEK scaffold mediates macrophages to affect osseointegration



            compared to scaffolds with small pore size, scaffolds with   Availability of data
            large pore size induce a higher degree of M1 to M2 transition   The data that support the findings of this study can be
            of macrophages and promote angiogenesis of HUVECs and   acquired from the corresponding author upon reasonable
            osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro. In addition,   request.
            scaffolds with large pore size promote the formation and
            ingrowth of new bone in vivo, thereby achieving a better   Reference
            osseointegration effect. This study explores the potential
            relationship between pore size, macrophage function, and   1.   Alves A, Thibeaux R, Toptan F,  et  al., 2019, Influence
            osseointegration of PEEK scaffolds, which may provide a   of macroporosity on NIH/3T3 adhesion, proliferation,
            new strategy for promoting osseointegration of PEEK bone   and  osteogenic  differentiation  of  MC3T3‐E1  over  bio‐
            repair materials with host bone.                      functionalized highly porous titanium implant material.
                                                                  J Biomed Mater Res Part B, 107(1): 73–85.
            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Chen Z, Bachhuka A, Wei F, et al., 2017, Nanotopography-

            None.                                                 based strategy for the precise manipulation of
                                                                  osteoimmunomodulation in bone regeneration. Nanoscale,
            Funding                                               9(46): 18129–18152.
                                                               3.   Trindade R, Albrektsson T, Tengvall P, et al., 2016, Foreign
            This work was supported by National Natural Science   body reaction to biomaterials: On mechanisms for buildup
            Foundation of China (Grant No. 82002286), Guangdong   and breakdown of osseointegration. Clin Implant Den Relat
            Science and Technology Planning Project (Grant No.    Res, 18(1): 192–203.
            2020A1515111041), and Henan Medical Science and    4.   Zhang D, Chen Q, Shi C,  et al., 2021, Dealing with the
            Technology Provincial and Ministry co-construction    foreign‐body response to implanted biomaterials: strategies
            research project (Grant No. SBGJ202102089).           and applications of new materials. Adv Funct Mater, 31(6):
                                                                  2007226.
            Conflict of interest
                                                               5.   Balabiyev A, Podolnikova NP, Kilbourne JA,  et al., 2021,
            The authors declare no conflict of interest.          Fibrin polymer on the surface of biomaterial implants drives
                                                                  the foreign body reaction. Biomaterials, 277: 121087.
            Author contributions                               6.   Niu Y, Wang Z, Shi Y, et al., 2021, Modulating macrophage

            Conceptualization: Xiaopeng Yang, Dichen Li           activities to promote endogenous bone regeneration:
            Data curation: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang, Huilong Liu,   Biological mechanisms and engineering approaches. Bioact
                                                                  Mater, 6(1): 244–261.
               Danyang Su
            Formal analysis: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang        7.   Schlundt C, Fischer H, Bucher CH,  et al., 2021, The
            Funding acquisitions: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang, Dichen   multifaceted roles of macrophages in bone regeneration: A
               Li                                                 story of polarization, activation and time.  Acta Biomater,
            Investigation: Xiaopeng Yang, Huilong Liu, Danyang Su  133: 46–57.
            Methodology: Xiaopeng Yang                         8.   Xie Y, Hu C, Feng Y, et al., 2020, Osteoimmunomodulatory
            Project administration: Dichen Li                     effects of biomaterial modification strategies on macrophage
            Resources: Xiaopeng Yang, Dichen Li, Jianbo Gao, Yan Wu  polarization and bone regeneration. Regen Biomater, 7(3):
            Supervision: Dichen Li, Jianbo Gao                    233–245.
            Visualization: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang          9.   Kim  H,  Wang  SY,  Kwak  G,  et al.,  2019,  Exosome‐guided
            Writing – original draft: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang  phenotypic switch of M1 to M2 macrophages for cutaneous
            Writing – review & editing: Xiaopeng Yang, Shenyu Yang,   wound healing. Adv Sci, 6(20): 1900513.
               Dichen Li                                       10.  Graney P, Ben-Shaul S, Landau S, et al., 2020, Macrophages
                                                                  of diverse phenotypes drive vascularization of engineered
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            tissues. Sci Adv, 6(18): eaay6391.

            Ethical approval was obtained from the Experimental   11.  Zhang W, Zhao F, Huang D, 2016, Strontium-substituted
            Animal Ethics Committee of Jinan University           submicrometer bioactive glasses modulate macrophage
            (20210426-02).                                        responses for improved bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater
                                                                  Interfaces, 8(45): 30747–30758.
            Consent for publication                            12.  Spiller KL, Anfang RR, Spiller KJ,  et al., 2014, The role
                                                                  of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue
            Not applicable.                                       engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 35(15): 4477–4488.


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        142                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.755
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155