Page 151 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printed PEEK scaffold mediates macrophages to affect osseointegration

13. Sun J-l, Jiao K, Niu L-n, et al., 2017, Intrafibrillar silicified 26. Ding R, Chen T, Xu Q, et al., 2019, Mixed modification
collagen scaffold modulates monocyte to promote cell of the surface microstructure and chemical state of
homing, angiogenesis and bone regeneration. Biomaterials, polyetheretherketone to improve its antimicrobial activity,
113: 203–216. hydrophilicity, cell adhesion, and bone integration. ACS
14. Spiller KL, Nassiri S, Witherel CE, et al., 2015, Sequential Biomater Sci Eng, 6(2): 842–851.
delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate 27. Yin Y, He X-T, Wang J, et al., 2020, Pore size-mediated
the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance macrophage M1-to-M2 transition influences new vessel
vascularization of bone scaffolds. Biomaterials, 37: 194–207. formation within the compartment of a scaffold. Appl Mater
15. Yang C, Ouyang L, Wang W, et al., 2019, Sodium butyrate- Today, 18: 100466.
modified sulfonated polyetheretherketone modulates 28. Wu R, Li Y, Shen M, et al., 2021, Bone tissue regeneration:
macrophage behavior and shows enhanced antibacterial and The role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive
osteogenic functions during implant-associated infections. scaffolds before clinical translation. Bioact Mater, 6(5):
J Mater Chem B, 7(36): 5541–5553. 1242–1254.
16. Han J, Kim YS, Lim M-Y, et al., 2018, Dual roles of 29. Liang C-C, Park AY, Guan J-L, 2007, In vitro scratch assay:
graphene oxide to attenuate inflammation and elicit timely A convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell
polarization of macrophage phenotypes for cardiac repair. migration in vitro. Nat Protoc, 2(2): 329–333.
ACS Nano, 12(2): 1959–1977.
30. Loi F, Córdova LA, Pajarinen J, 2016, Inflammation, fracture
17. Garg K, Pullen NA, Oskeritzian CA, et al., 2013, Macrophage and bone repair. Bone, 86: 119–130.
functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber
and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials, 31. Qiu P, Li M, Chen K, et al., 2020, Periosteal matrix-derived
34(18): 4439–4451. hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune
regulation coupled with enhanced angio-and osteogenesis.
18. Luu TU, Gott SC, Woo BW, et al., 2015, Micro-and Biomaterials, 227: 119552.
nanopatterned topographical cues for regulating
macrophage cell shape and phenotype. ACS Appl Mater 32. Yang C, Zhao C, Wang X, et al., 2019, Stimulation of
Interfaces, 7(51): 28665–28672. osteogenesis and angiogenesis by micro/nano hierarchical
hydroxyapatite via macrophage immunomodulation.
19. Sussman EM, Halpin MC, Muster J, et al., 2014, Porous Nanoscale, 11(38): 17699–17708.
implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local
macrophage polarization in the foreign body reaction. Ann 33. Aplin AC, Ligresti G, Fogel E, 2014, Regulation of
Biomed Eng, 42(7): 1508–1516. angiogenesis, mural cell recruitment and adventitial
macrophage behavior by Toll-like receptors. Angiogenesis,
20. Dong T, Duan C, Wang S, et al., 2020, Multifunctional 17(1): 147–161.
surface with enhanced angiogenesis for improving long-
term osteogenic fixation of poly (ether ether ketone) 34. Zhao F, Lei B, Li X, et al., 2018, Promoting in vivo early
implants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12(13): 14971–14982. angiogenesis with sub-micrometer strontium-contained
bioactive microspheres through modulating macrophage
21. Liu X, Ouyang L, Chen L, et al., 2022, Hydroxyapatite phenotypes. Biomaterials, 178: 36–47.
composited PEEK with 3D porous surface enhances
osteoblast differentiation through mediating NO by 35. Bobbert F, Zadpoor A. Effects of bone substitute architecture
macrophage. Regen Biomater, 9. and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and
structure of new bone. J Mater Chem B, 5(31): 6175–6192.
22. Kim J, Cao Y, Eddy C, et al., 2021, The mechanics and
dynamics of cancer cells sensing noisy 3D contact guidance. 36. Li J, Zhi W, Xu T, et al., 2016, Ectopic osteogenesis
Proc Natl Acad Sci, 118(10): e2024780118. and angiogenesis regulated by porous architecture of
hydroxyapatite scaffolds with similar interconnecting
23. Gao C, Wang Z, Jiao Z, et al., 2021, Enhancing antibacterial structure in vivo. Regen Biomater, 3(5): 285–297.
capability and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone
(PEEK) implants by dual-functional surface modification. 37. Diao J, Ding H, Huang M, et al., 2019, Bone defect model
Mater Des, 205: 109733. dependent optimal pore sizes of 3D‐plotted beta‐tricalcium
phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Small Methods,
24. Xue Z, Wang Z, Huang J, et al., 2020, Rapid construction 3(11): 1900237.
of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) biological implants
incorporated with brushite (CaHPO4· 2H2O) and antibiotics 38. Ji Y, Zhang H, Ru J, et al., 2021, Creating micro-submicro
for anti-infection and enhanced osseointegration. Mater Sci structure and grafting hydroxyl group on PEEK by
Eng C, 111: 110782. femtosecond laser and hydroxylation to synergistically
activate cellular response. Mater Des, 199: 109413.
25. Torstrick FB, Lin AS, Potter D, et al., 2018, Porous PEEK
improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma- 39. Dey S, Sen I, Samanta S, 2021, Mechanical characterisation
sprayed titanium coating on PEEK. Biomaterials, 185: of PEEK-HA composite as an orthopaedic implant.
106–116. Adv Mater Process Technol, 1–24.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 143 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.755