Page 156 - IJB-9-5
P. 156

International Journal of Bioprinting        Guide about the effects of sterilization on 3D-printed materials for medicine



            Table 1. Information about the material and the 3D printing technology
             Printing   Material   Vendor    City and country of origin  Sample  Flexible/Elastic  Institute responsible
             technology                                                                        for printing
             SLA       Elastic 50  Formlabs  Massachusetts, USA    Cylindrical   Yes           HSJD
             SLA       Flexible 80  Formlabs  Massachusetts, USA   Cylindrical   Yes           HSJD
             SLA       Durable     Formlabs  Massachusetts, USA    Type 1A ISO 527  No         HSJD
             SLA       Surgical Guide  Formlabs  Massachusetts, USA  Type 1A ISO 527  No       HSJD
             MJ        Elastic Clear  Stratasys  Stratasys, Minnesota, USA  Cylindrical  Yes   HSJD
             MJ        MED610      Stratasys  Stratasys, Minnesota, USA  Type 1A ISO 527  No   HSJD
             MJ        VERO        Stratasys  Stratasys, Minnesota, USA  Type 1A ISO 527  No   HSJD
             FDM       ABS         Kimya     Nantes, France        Type 1A ISO 527  No         HSJD
             FDM       PLA         Kimya     Nantes, France        Type 1A ISO 527  No         HSJD
             FDM       TPU/TPE     Recreus   Alicante, Spain       Cylindrical   Yes           CIM UPC
             SLS       PA12        3D Systems  Hemel Hempstead, UK  Type 1A ISO 527  No        CIM UPC
            Abbreviations: ABS, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; CIM UPC, Centre CIM of Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; FDM, fused deposition modeling;
            HSJD, Barcelona Children’s Hospital Sant Joan de Déu; MJ, material jetting; PLA, polylactic acid; SLA, stereolithography; SLS, selective laser sintering;
            TPE, thermoplastic elastomer; TPU, thermoplastic polyurethane


            samples were manufactured using Epsilon W50 (BCN3D,   printer was used at HSJD. The samples were manufactured
            Barcelona, Spain). The printing parameters were the same   horizontally.
            for all materials, i.e., a nozzle diameter of 0.4 mm, a layer
            height of 0.1  mm,  an  infill  of 80%,  an infill overlap  of   2.3. Sterilization method
            15%, and a wall thickness of 0.8 mm. The samples were   To  evaluate  the  critical  effect  of  sterilization  methods
            manufactured horizontally.                         in 3D-printed, custom-made medical devices used in
                                                               hospitals, three of the most used sterilization processes
            2.2.2. Stereolithography                           available in clinical settings were selected following
            This process is based on photopolymerization of resins   clinically validated protocols. To compare the effect of the
            using UV laser to create the layers. Each layer is solidified   different processes, the produced specimens were divided
            in  x–y directions and the building platform rises in  z   into control and study groups. For each material, three
            direction to create the different layers. For the manufacture   specimens were printed for each sterilization method,
            of Surgical Guide, Durable samples, Elastic 50, and Flexible   and three more specimens were printed as controls. The
            80 samples, a Form 3BL (Formlabs, Massachusetts, USA)   sample size is considered appropriate since the objective
            was used at Barcelona Children’s Hospital Sant Joan de   is to demonstrate the effect of sterilization on each
            Déu (HSJD). The samples were manufactured with an   material, instead of demonstrating the exact mechanical
            angle of 20° from the building platform to increase product   property value of each material (since the mechanical
            resistance and facilitate postprocessing.          property values of each material are already given by the
                                                               manufacturers [Table 2] and several studies have already
            2.2.3. Selective laser sintering                   investigated in this regard for each material). Mechanical
            SLS is a process in which the 3D printer uses a laser as both the   results between studies and manufacturers may vary due
            power and heat source to sinter powdered material layer-by-  to different testing methods used.
            layer until the 3D object is manufactured. For the manufacture
            of the PA12 samples, a Ricoh AM S5500P was used at CIM   No  sterilization or  disinfection process was  applied
            UPC facilities, which has a layer thickness between 0.08 and   to the control sample. The study group samples were
            0.1 mm. The samples were manufactured horizontally.  subjected to three different sterilization procedures, i.e.,
                                                               HPO,  Autoclave  121,  and  Autoclave  134,  available  at a
            2.2.4. Material jetting                            sterilization-certified facility at HSJD. All of them were
            MJ is based on photopolymerization of material jetted onto   performed using machines from Matachana (Italy). Those
            the printing platform, where it is solidified by UV light   methods are among the most used for the sterilization of
            and the model is built layer-by-layer. For the manufacture   medical devices. Not all material samples were subjected to
            of the  MED610, VERO and Elastic Clear  samples, a  J5   sterilization methods. The melting limit of each material,


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        148                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.756
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161