Page 161 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Guide about the effects of sterilization on 3D-printed materials for medicine

Table 5. Mechanical properties of the 3D-printed MED610
Parameters Mechanical properties
Tensile strength (MPa) Young’s modulus (MPa) Elongation at yield (%) Elongation at break (%)
Control 26.26 ± 4.30 1375 ± 168 1.92 ± 0.15 8.82 ± 1.90
HPO 26.43 ± 0.82 1341 ± 43 1.92 ± 0.16 12.95 ± 3.55
AU121 21.69 ± 2.71 1201 ± 76 1.93 ± 0.19 12.14 ± 2.10
AU134 30.74 ± 2.75 1380 ± 145 1.33 ± 0.67 6.04 ± 5.55
Data are represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 MED610 Control/group; N = 3 MED610 HPO/group; N = 3 MED610 AU121/group; N = 3 MED610 AU134/group.

Figure 6. VERO sterilization comparison. Data are represented as mean values. N = 3 VERO Control/group; N = 3 VERO HPO/group; N = 3 VERO
AU121/group; N = 3 VERO AU134/group.

Figure 7. Surgical Guide resin sterilization comparison. Data are represented as mean values. N = 3 Surgical Guide resin Control/group; N = 3 Surgical
Guide resin HPO/group; N = 3 Surgical Guide resin AU121/group; N = 3 Surgical Guide resin AU134/group.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 153 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.756