Page 171 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Guide about the effects of sterilization on 3D-printed materials for medicine

4. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al., 2016, 3D-printing 17. ISO 11357-2, 1999, Plastics—Differential scanning
techniques in a medical setting: A systematic literature calorimetry—Part 2: Determination of glass transition
review. Biomed Eng Online, 1–21. temperature.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4 18. Kubyshkina G, Zupančič B, Štukelj M, et al., 2011,
5. Dodziuk H, 2016, Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. Sterilization effect on structure, thermal and time-dependent
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish. J Thorac properties of polyamides. In: Proulx T. (ed.), Mechanics of
Cardiovasc Surg, 13(3): 283–293. Time-Dependent Materials and Processes in Conventio.
https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2016.62625 19. Sicard GK, Hayashi K, Manley PA, 2002, Evaluation of
5 types of fishing ,aterial, 2 sterilization methods, and a
6. Kunovjanek M, Wankm C, 2021, An analysis of the crimp-clamp system for extra-articular stabilization of the
global additive manufacturing response to the COVID-19 canine stifle joint. Vet Surg, 31: 78–84.
pandemic. J Manuf Technol Manag, 32(9): 75–100.
https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2002.30539
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2020-0263
20. De Melo D, Kelly de Oliveira L, Vickery K, et al., 2018,
7. Kalaskar DM, 2022, 3D Printing in Medicine, Woodhead P. Reprocessing safety issues associated with complex-design
Woodhead Publishing. orthopaedic loaned surgical instruments and implants.
8. Tejo-Otero A, Buj-Corral I, Fenollosa-Artés F, 2020, 3D Injury, 49(11): 2005–2012.
printing in medicine for preoperative surgical planning: A https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.006
review. Ann Biomed Eng, 48(2): 536–555.
21. George M, Aroom KR, Hawes HG, et al., 2017, 3D printed
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02411-0
surgical instruments: The design and fabrication process.
9. Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, et al., 2017, Value of 3D World J Surg, 41(1): 314–319.
printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3814-5
Endosc, 31(10): 4102–4110.
22. Wallace CA, Words K, 2016, New developments in
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5
disinfection and sterilization. Am J Infect Control, 44(5):
10. Lee K, 2015, Accuracy of three-dimensional printing e23–e27.
for manufacturing replica teeth. Korean J Orthod, 45(5):
217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.02.022
11. Rozema FR, Bos RRM, Boering G, et al., 1991, The effects 23. Perez MA, Block M, Espalin D, et al., 2012, Sterilization
of different steam-sterilization programs on material of FDM-manufactured parts. In 2012 international solid
properties of poly (L-lactide). J Appl Biomater, 2(1): 23–28 freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at
Austin. 285–296.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770020104
http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15350
12. Cappello IA, Candelari M, Panone L, et al., 2022, 3D printed
surgical guide for coronary artery bypass graft: Workflow 24. Oth O, Dauchot C, Orellana M, et al., 2019, How to sterilize
from computed tomography to prototype. Bioengineering, 3D printed objects for surgical use? An evaluation of the
9(5): 179. volumetric deformation of 3D-printed genioplasty guide
in PLA and PETG after sterilization by low-temperature
13. Costanzo R, Ferini G, Brunasso L, et al., 2022, The role hydrogen peroxide gas plasma abstract. Open Dent J, 13(1):
of 3D-printed custom-made vertebral body implants in 410–417.
the treatment of spinal tumors: A systematic review. Life,
12(4):489. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601913010410
14. Cornejo J, Cornejo-Aguilar JA, Vargas M, et al., 2022, 25. Modjarrad K, Ebnesajjad S, Eds., 2014, Handbook of Polymer
Anatomical engineering and 3D printing for surgery and Applications in Medicine and Medical Devices, 354.
medical devices: International review and future exponential 26. Chen JV, Tanaka K S, Dang ABC, et al., 2020, Identifying a
innovations. Biomed Res Int, 2022: 6797745. commercially-available 3D printing process that minimizes
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6797745 model distortion after annealing and autoclaving and the
effect of steam sterilization on mechanical strength. 3D Print
15. ISO 13485:2016—Medical devices—Quality management Med, 6: 1–10.
systems—Requirements for regulatory purposes. www.iso.
org (accessed Nov. 30, 2022). 27. Popescu D, Baciu F, Vl D, et al., 2020, Effects of multiple
sterilizations and natural aging on the mechanical behavior
16. Neches RY, Flynn KJ, Zaman L, et al., 2016, On the intrinsic
sterility of 3D printing. PeerJ, 4: e2661. of 3D-printed ABS. Mech Mater, 148(December 2019):
2020.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103423

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 163 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.756