Page 172 - IJB-9-5
P. 172

International Journal of Bioprinting        Guide about the effects of sterilization on 3D-printed materials for medicine



            28.  Aboamer MA, Elgohary DH, Almukil AA, et al., 2022, A   38.  Rynio P, Galant K, Łukasz W,  et al., 2022, Effects of
               comparative study of mechanical behavior of ABS material   sterilization  methods  on  different  3D  printable  materials
               based on UVC sterilization for medical usage. J Mech Sci   for templates of physician-modified aortic stent grafts used
               Technol, 36(7): 3373–3385.                         in vascular surgery—A preliminary study. Int J Mol Sci, 23:
                                                                  1–13.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0616-6
                                                               39.  Popescu D, Baciu F, Vl D, et al., 2020, Mechanics of materials
            29.  Bosc R, Tortolano L, Hersant B, et al., 2021, Bacteriological   effects of multiple sterilizations and natural aging on the
               and mechanical impact of the Sterrad sterilization method   mechanical behavior of 3D-printed ABS. Mech Mater, 148:
               on personalized 3D printed guides for mandibular   103423.
               reconstruction. Sci Rep, 11(1): 1–10.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103423
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79752-7
                                                               40.  Luchini K, Sloan SNB, Mauro R, et al., 2021, Sterilization and
            30.  Wong JY, Pfahnl AC, 2014, 3D printing of surgical   sanitizing of 3D-printed personal protective equipment using
               instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat Sp Env   polypropylene and a single wall design. 3D Print Med, 7(1):
               Med, 85: 758–763.
                                                                  1–10.
               https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3898.2014
                                                               41.  Coté J J, Haggstrom J, Vivekanandan R,  et al., 2020,
            31.  Haryńska A, Gubanska I, Kucinska-Lipka J,  et al., 2018,   COVID-19 and a novel initiative to improve safety by
               Fabrication and characterization of flexible medical-  3D printing personal protective equipment parts from
               grade  TPU  filament  for  Fused  Deposition  Modeling  3DP   computed tomography. 3D Print Med, 6(1): 1–12.
               technology. Polymers (Basel), 10(12): 1304.
                                                               42.  Spörk M, 2018, Optimisation of the mechanical properties
               https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121304              and  processing  of  polypropylene  and  poly  (lactic  acid)
                                                                  parts produced by extrusion-based additive manufacturing,
            32.  Pop SI,  Dudescu M, Mihali SG,  et al., 2022,  Effects  of
               disinfection and steam sterilization on the mechanical   Ghent University.
               properties of 3D SLA- and DLP-printed surgical guides for   43.  Głowacki M, Mazurkiewicz A, Słomion M,  et al., 2022,
               orthodontic implant placement.  Polymers (Basel), 14(10):   Resistance of 3D-printed components , test specimens and
               2107.                                              products to work under environmental conditions—Review.
                                                                  Materials (Basel), 15(17): 1–19.
            33.  Sharma N, Cao S, Msallem B, et al., 2020, Effects of steam
               sterilization on 3D printed biocompatible resin materials for   44.  Török G, Gombocz P, Bognár E,  et al., 2020, Effects of
               surgical guides—An accuracy assessment study. J Clin Med,   disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes
               9(5): 1506.                                        and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for
                                                                  implant therapy—Pilot study. BMC Oral Health, 20(1): 1–12.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051506
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1005-0
            34.  Chan M, Huang LG, Wu P, et al., 2021, Study the design
               parameters of 3D printing surgical guide deformation   45.  Stratasys, 2023, PolyJet materials.
               quantity by disinfection and sterilization.  J Ind Prod Eng,   https://www.stratasys.com/en/materials/materials-catalog/
               38(7): 499–507.
                                                                  polyjet-materials/?filter=MT_PolyJet
               https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2021.1943719
                                                               46.  Gielisch M, Heimes D, Thiemet DGE,  et al., 2022, Steam-
            35.  Robles Linares-Alvelais HRS José A, Obedt Figueroa-Cavazos   sterilized and degradable fused filament fabrication-printed
               J, Chuck-Hernandez C, et al., 2018, Hydrostatic high-pressure   polylactide/polyhydroxyalkanoate surgical guides for dental
               post-processing of specimens fabricated by DLP, SLA, and   implants: Are they accurate enough for static navigation?
               FDM: An alternative for the sterilization of polymer-based   Int J Bioprint, 9(2).
               biomedical devices. Materials (Basel), 11: 2540.
                                                                  http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.655
               https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122540
                                                               47.  Zhu WY, Su YX, Pow EHN,  et al., 2021, ‘Three-in-one’
            36.  Rouz F, Cade R, Naveau A,  et al., 2022, Accuracy of   patient-specific  surgical  guides  for  simultaneous  dental
               commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides   implants in fibula flap jaw reconstruction: A prospective
               in dental implantology. J Dent, 117: 103909.       case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, (23): 43–53.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909        https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12954
            37.  Told R, Ujfalusi Z, Pentek M, et al., 2022, A state-of-the-  48.  Schwarzkopf R, Fernandez E, Buckland A,  et al., 2019,
               art guide to the sterilization of thermoplastic polymers   Feasibility of single-use 3D-printed instruments for total
               and resin materials used in the additive manufacturing of   knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J, (101): 115–120.
               medical devices. Mater Des, 223: 111119.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1506.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111119       R1


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        164                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.756
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177