Page 172 - IJB-9-5
P. 172
International Journal of Bioprinting Guide about the effects of sterilization on 3D-printed materials for medicine
28. Aboamer MA, Elgohary DH, Almukil AA, et al., 2022, A 38. Rynio P, Galant K, Łukasz W, et al., 2022, Effects of
comparative study of mechanical behavior of ABS material sterilization methods on different 3D printable materials
based on UVC sterilization for medical usage. J Mech Sci for templates of physician-modified aortic stent grafts used
Technol, 36(7): 3373–3385. in vascular surgery—A preliminary study. Int J Mol Sci, 23:
1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0616-6
39. Popescu D, Baciu F, Vl D, et al., 2020, Mechanics of materials
29. Bosc R, Tortolano L, Hersant B, et al., 2021, Bacteriological effects of multiple sterilizations and natural aging on the
and mechanical impact of the Sterrad sterilization method mechanical behavior of 3D-printed ABS. Mech Mater, 148:
on personalized 3D printed guides for mandibular 103423.
reconstruction. Sci Rep, 11(1): 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103423
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79752-7
40. Luchini K, Sloan SNB, Mauro R, et al., 2021, Sterilization and
30. Wong JY, Pfahnl AC, 2014, 3D printing of surgical sanitizing of 3D-printed personal protective equipment using
instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat Sp Env polypropylene and a single wall design. 3D Print Med, 7(1):
Med, 85: 758–763.
1–10.
https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3898.2014
41. Coté J J, Haggstrom J, Vivekanandan R, et al., 2020,
31. Haryńska A, Gubanska I, Kucinska-Lipka J, et al., 2018, COVID-19 and a novel initiative to improve safety by
Fabrication and characterization of flexible medical- 3D printing personal protective equipment parts from
grade TPU filament for Fused Deposition Modeling 3DP computed tomography. 3D Print Med, 6(1): 1–12.
technology. Polymers (Basel), 10(12): 1304.
42. Spörk M, 2018, Optimisation of the mechanical properties
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121304 and processing of polypropylene and poly (lactic acid)
parts produced by extrusion-based additive manufacturing,
32. Pop SI, Dudescu M, Mihali SG, et al., 2022, Effects of
disinfection and steam sterilization on the mechanical Ghent University.
properties of 3D SLA- and DLP-printed surgical guides for 43. Głowacki M, Mazurkiewicz A, Słomion M, et al., 2022,
orthodontic implant placement. Polymers (Basel), 14(10): Resistance of 3D-printed components , test specimens and
2107. products to work under environmental conditions—Review.
Materials (Basel), 15(17): 1–19.
33. Sharma N, Cao S, Msallem B, et al., 2020, Effects of steam
sterilization on 3D printed biocompatible resin materials for 44. Török G, Gombocz P, Bognár E, et al., 2020, Effects of
surgical guides—An accuracy assessment study. J Clin Med, disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes
9(5): 1506. and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for
implant therapy—Pilot study. BMC Oral Health, 20(1): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051506
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1005-0
34. Chan M, Huang LG, Wu P, et al., 2021, Study the design
parameters of 3D printing surgical guide deformation 45. Stratasys, 2023, PolyJet materials.
quantity by disinfection and sterilization. J Ind Prod Eng, https://www.stratasys.com/en/materials/materials-catalog/
38(7): 499–507.
polyjet-materials/?filter=MT_PolyJet
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2021.1943719
46. Gielisch M, Heimes D, Thiemet DGE, et al., 2022, Steam-
35. Robles Linares-Alvelais HRS José A, Obedt Figueroa-Cavazos sterilized and degradable fused filament fabrication-printed
J, Chuck-Hernandez C, et al., 2018, Hydrostatic high-pressure polylactide/polyhydroxyalkanoate surgical guides for dental
post-processing of specimens fabricated by DLP, SLA, and implants: Are they accurate enough for static navigation?
FDM: An alternative for the sterilization of polymer-based Int J Bioprint, 9(2).
biomedical devices. Materials (Basel), 11: 2540.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.655
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122540
47. Zhu WY, Su YX, Pow EHN, et al., 2021, ‘Three-in-one’
36. Rouz F, Cade R, Naveau A, et al., 2022, Accuracy of patient-specific surgical guides for simultaneous dental
commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides implants in fibula flap jaw reconstruction: A prospective
in dental implantology. J Dent, 117: 103909. case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, (23): 43–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12954
37. Told R, Ujfalusi Z, Pentek M, et al., 2022, A state-of-the- 48. Schwarzkopf R, Fernandez E, Buckland A, et al., 2019,
art guide to the sterilization of thermoplastic polymers Feasibility of single-use 3D-printed instruments for total
and resin materials used in the additive manufacturing of knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J, (101): 115–120.
medical devices. Mater Des, 223: 111119.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1506.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111119 R1
Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 164 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.756

