Page 33 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting CFD analysis for multimaterial bioprinting conditions

https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9050199 58. Aguado BA, Mulyasasmita W, Su J, et al., 2012, Improving
viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the
48. Shah I, Kim SW, Kim K, et al., 2019, Experimental and
numerical analysis of Y-shaped split and recombination design of hydrogel cell carriers. Tissue Eng Part A, 18(7-8):
micro-mixer with different mixing units. Chem Eng J, 806–815.
358:691–706. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.045 59. Gómez-Blanco JC, Mancha-Sánchez E, Marcos AC, et al., 2020,
Bioink temperature influence on shear stress, pressure and
49. Raza W, Hossain S, Kim KY, 2017, Effective mixing in a short velocity using computational simulation. Processes, 8(7):1–18.
serpentine split-and-recombination micromixer. Sensors
Actuators B Chem, 258:381–392. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8070865

https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.11.135 60. Meng HB, Song MY, Yu YF, et al., 2017, Enhancement of
laminar flow and mixing performance in a lightnin static
50. Mouheb NA, Malsch D, Montillet A, et al., 2012, Numerical mixer. Int J Chem React Eng, 15(3):1–21.
and experimental investigations of mixing in T-shaped and
cross-shaped micromixers. Chem Eng Sci, 68(1):278–289. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0112

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.036 61. Nair K, Gandhi M, Khalil S, et al., 2009, Characterization
of cell viability during bioprinting processes. Biotechnol J,
51. Rauline D, Tanguy PA, Le Blévec JM, et al., 1998, Numerical 4(8):1168–1177.
investigation of the performance of several static mixers. The
Canadian J Chem Eng, 76(3):527−535. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200900004
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450760325 62. Sarker M, Chen XB, 2017, Modeling the flow behavior and
flow rate of medium viscosity alginate for scaffold fabrication
52. Grace HP, 1982, Dispersion phenomena in high viscosity with a three-dimensional bioplotter. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans
immiscible fluid systems and application of static mixers ASME, 139(8):1–14.
as dispersion devices in such systems. Chem Eng Commun,
14(3–6):225–277. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036226
63. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to assess
https://doi.org/10.1080/00986448208911047
printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting
53. Shah NF, Kale DD, 1991, Pressure drop for laminar flow and evaluation of rheological properties governing
of non-Newtonian fluids in static mixers. Chem Eng Sci, bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9(4).
46(8):2159–2161.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(91)80175-X 64. Snyder J, Son AR, Hamid Q, et al., 2015, Mesenchymal
54. Haddadi MM, Hosseini SH, Rashtchian D, et al., 2020, stem cell printing and process regulated cell properties.
Comparative analysis of different static mixers performance Biofabrication, 7(4).
by CFD technique: An innovative mixer. Chin J Chem Eng, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/044106
28(3):672–684.
65. Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al., 2017, Extrusion
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.09.004 bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks.
55. Ates G, Bartolo P, 2021, Numerical simulation of Adv Healthc Mater, 6(12):1–11.
multimaterial polymer mixing for bioprinting applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451
J Addit Manuf Technol, 1(3):606.
66. Blaeser A, Campos DFD, Puster U, et al., 2016, Controlling
https://10.18416/JAMTECH.2111606 shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance
56. Hozumi T, Ohta S, Ito T, 2015, Analysis of the calcium printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc
alginate gelation process using a Kenics static mixer. Ind Eng Mater, 5(3):326–333.
Chem Res, 54(7):2099–2107. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5044693 67. Manojlovic V, Djonlagic J, Obradovic B, et al., 2006,
Investigations of cell immobilization in alginate: Rheological
57. Ortega ES, Sanz-Garcia A, Pernia-Espinoza A, et al., 2019,
Efficient fabrication of polycaprolactone scaffolds for and electrostatic extrusion studies. J Chem Technol
printing hybrid tissue-engineered constructs. Materials Biotechnol, 81(4):505–510.
(Basel), 12(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1465
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040613

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 25 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0219