Page 499 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting cell-laden protein-based hydrogel

9. Ding S, Feng L, Wu J, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of stem cells : 20. Schloss AC, Williams DM, Regan LJ, 2016, Protein-based
Interplay of bioprinting process, bioinks, and stem cell hydrogels for tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol, 940:
properties. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 4(9): 3108–3124. 167–177.
http://doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00399 http://doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39196-0_8
10. Kundu J, Shim J-H, Jang J, et al., 2015, An additive 21. Davari N, Bakhtiary N, Khajehmohammadi M, et al., 2022,
manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted Protein-based hydrogels: Promising materials for tissue
scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen engineering. Polymers (Basel), 14: 986.
Med, 9(11): 1286–1297.
http://doi:10.3390/polym14050986
http://doi:10.1002/term.1682
22. Rasheed T, Bilal M, Zhao Y, et al., 2019, Physiochemical
11. Ozbolat IT, 2015, Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ characteristics and bone/cartilage tissue engineering
constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol, 33(7): 395–400. potentialities of protein-based macromolecules — A review.
Int J Biol Macromol, 121(5): 13–22.
http://doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005
http://doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.009
12. Kačarević Ž, Rider P, Alkildani S, et al., 2018, An
introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and 23. Catoira MC, Fusaro L, Di Francesco D, et al., 2019, Overview
future aspects. Materials (Basel), 11(11): 2199. of natural hydrogels for regenerative medicine applications.
J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30(10): 115.
http://doi:10.3390/ma11112199
http://doi:10.1007/s10856-019-6318-7
13. Ghorbani F, Ghalandari B, Khajehmohammadi M, et al.,
2023, Photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid bioinks for bone 24. Maia FRA, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, eds., 2023, Handbook of
and cartilage tissue engineering applications. Int Mater Rev, the Extracellular Matrix, Springer International Publishing,
68(6): 1–42. Cham.
http://doi:10.1080/09506608.2023.2167559 http://doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92090-6
14. Raza F, Zafar H, Zhu Y, et al., 2018, A review on recent advances 25. Włodarczyk-Biegun MK, del Campo A, 2017, 3D bioprinting
in stabilizing peptides/proteins upon fabrication in hydrogels of structural proteins. Biomaterials, 134: 180–201.
from biodegradable polymers. Pharmaceutics, 10(1): 16.
http://doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.019
http://doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10010016
26. Lotfi Z, Khakbiz M, Davari N, et al., 2023, Fabrication
15. Di Bella C, Fosang A, Donati DM, et al., 2015, 3D bioprinting and multiscale modeling of polycaprolactone/amniotic
of cartilage for orthopedic surgeons : Reading between the membrane electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for wound
lines. Front Surg, 2: 1–7. healing. Artif Organs, 00: 1–18.
http://doi:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00039 http://doi:10.1111/aor.14518
16. Tolabi H, Davari N, Khajehmohammadi M, et al., 2023, 27. Norouzi F, Pourmadadi M, Yazdian F, et al., 2022, PVA-based
Progress of microfluidic hydrogel‐based scaffolds and nanofibers containing chitosan modified with graphene
organ‐on‐chips for the cartilage tissue engineering. Adv oxide and carbon quantum dot-doped TiO2 enhance wound
Mater, 35(26): 2208852. healing in a rat model. J Funct Biomater, 13(4): 300.
http://doi:10.1002/adma.202208852 http://doi:10.3390/jfb13040300
17. Razaviye MK, Tafti RA, Khajehmohammadi M, 2022, 28. Yahay Z, Tolabi H, Delavar F, et al., 2023, Fabrication of
An investigation on mechanical properties of PA12 parts meso/macroporous TiO2/PCL composite scaffolds by
produced by a SLS 3D printer: An experimental approach. direct ink writing: The effects of porogen content on the
CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol, 38: 760–768. compressive modulus and in vitro behavior. Mater Today
Commun, 35: 105769.
http://doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.06.016
http://doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105769
18. Dababneh AB, Ozbolat IT, 2014, Bioprinting technology:
A current state-of-the-art review. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans 29. Veiga A, Silva IV, Duarte MM, et al., 2021, Current trends
ASME, 136(6): 1–12. on protein driven bioinks for 3D printing. Pharmaceutics,
13(9): 1444.
http://doi:10.1115/1.4028512
http://doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13091444
19. Khajehmohammadi M, Azizi Tafti R, Nikukar H, 2023,
Effect of porosity on mechanical and biological properties 30. Khoeini R, Nosrati H, Akbarzadeh A, et al., 2021, Natural
of bioprinted scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 111(2): and synthetic bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv NanoBiomed
245–260. Res, 1(8): 2000097.
http://doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37455 http://doi:10.1002/anbr.202000097

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 491 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1089