Page 546 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting High-performance SrCS scaffolds via vat photopolymerization

35. Zakeri S, Vippola M, Levänen E, 2020, A comprehensive https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.047
review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in 46. Xu X, Zhou S, Wu J, et al., 2021, Relationship between the
stereolithography. Addit Manuf, 35.
adhesion properties of UV-curable alumina suspensions and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101177 the functionalities and structures of UV-curable acrylate
36. Chen A, Gao F, Li M, et al., 2019, Mullite ceramic foams with monomers for DLP-based ceramic stereolithography. Ceram
controlled pore structures and low thermal conductivity Int, 47(23): 32699–32709.
prepared by SLS using core-shell structured polyamide12/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.166
FAHSs composites. Ceram Int, 45(12): 15538–15546.
47. Zhang X, Xu Y, Li L, et al., 2019, Acrylate-based photosensitive
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.059 resin for stereolithographic three-dimensional printing.
J Appl Polym Sci, 136(21).
37. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ, 2010, The effect
of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47487
migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone 48. Du Z, Leng H, Guo L, et al., 2020, Calcium silicate scaffolds
tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31(3): 461–466.
promoting bone regeneration via the doping of Mg2+ or
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 Mn2+ ion. Compos B: Eng, 190.
38. Wang H, Xu Y, Wang P, et al., 2021, Cell-mediated injectable https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107937
blend hydrogel-BCP ceramic scaffold for in situ condylar 49. Chen A, Wu J, Cheng L, et al., 2020, Enhanced densification
osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater, 123: 364–378.
and dielectric properties of CaTiO3-0.3NdAlO3 ceramics
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.056 fabricated by direct coagulation casting. J Eur Ceram Soc,
40(4): 1174–1180.
39. Halloran JW, 2016, Ceramic stereolithography: Additive
manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization. Annu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.12.033
Rev Mater Res, 46(1): 19–40.
50. Liu Y, Chen A, Wu J, et al., 2018, Effect of K2SO4 additions
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031841 on properties of porous fibrous alumina ceramics prepared
by DCC and lost-mold method. J Am Ceram Soc, 101(6):
40. Qi G, Zeng Y, Chen J, 2022, Preparation of porous SnO2- 2216–2227.
based ceramics with lattice structure by DLP. Ceram Int,
48(10): 14568–14577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.15384
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.350 51. Chen A, Li M, Wu J, et al., 2019, Enhancement mechanism of
mechanical performance of highly porous mullite ceramics
41. Xing H, Zou B, Liu X, et al., 2020, Effect of particle size
distribution on the preparation of ZTA ceramic paste with bimodal pore structures prepared by selective laser
applying for stereolithography 3D printing. Powder Technol, sintering. J Alloys Compd, 776: 486–494.
359: 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.066 52. Chen A, Chen J, Wu J, et al., 2019, Porous mullite ceramics
with enhanced mechanical properties prepared by SLS using
42. Chen S, Wang C, Zheng W, et al., 2022, Effects of particle
size distribution and sintering temperature on properties MnO2 and phenolic resin coated double-shell powders.
of alumina mold material prepared by stereolithography. Ceram Int, 45(17): 21136–21143.
Ceram Int, 48(5): 6069–6077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.090
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.145 53. Ma S, Tang Q, Zhu C, et al., 2022, Laser powder bed fusion-
built Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds composed of sheet and strut-
43. Zheng J, Zhang H, Li X, 2021, Effect of ternary particles size
distribution on rheology of slurry and microstructure of based porous structures: Morphology, mechanical properties,
DLP printed ZTA ceramic. Mater Chem Phys, 269. and biocompatibility. Chin J Mech Eng: Addit Manuf Front, 1(4).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100051
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124656
54. Chen A, Lu L, Cheng L, et al., 2019, TEM analysis and
44. Esposito Corcione C, Montagna F, Greco A, et al., 2006, Free
form fabrication of silica moulds for aluminium casting by mechanical strengthening mechanism of MnO2 sintering aid
stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J, 12(4): 184–188. in selective laser sintered porous mullites. J Alloys Compd, 809.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151809
https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610682688
55. Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang W, et al., 2017, Analysis of
45. Huang X, Dai H, Hu Y, et al., 2021, Development of a high
solid loading β-TCP suspension with a low refractive index the osteogenic effects of biomaterials using numerical
simulation. Biomed Res Int, 2017: 6981586.
contrast for DLP-based ceramic stereolithography. J Eur
Ceram Soc, 41(6): 3743–3754. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6981586

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 538 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1233