Page 121 - v11i4
P. 121

International Journal of Bioprinting                                3D bioprinting for translational toxicology




            3D porous architecture and an integrated heater design.   Photopolymerization-based 3D printing, known for its
            This  innovation reduced  response  and  recovery  times   high-resolution microstructural fabrication, has opened
            to 214 and 222 s, respectively, and achieved a sensitivity   new avenues in biosensing applications. Cao  et al.
                                                                                                            173
            of  0.087%  1/ppm.  Its  dual-mode  heating  mechanism   employed stereolithography to construct a paper-based
            enhanced gas desorption efficiency, laying the groundwork   microfluidic screen-printed electrode integrated with
            for  the  development  of  wearable  respiratory  monitoring   reduced graphene oxide-tetraethylene pentamine/Prussian
            devices, as shown in Figure 6B. Expanding the frontier of   blue composite materials, achieving a glucose detection
            laser technology, Hecht et al.  employed bubble-assisted   limit of 25 μM, which is comparable to commercial
                                   172
            laser-induced forward transfer to achieve submicron-scale   glucose meters. This integrated approach, which
            patterning of polyimide-based bioinks on nitrocellulose   combines microfluidic channels with electrochemical
            substrates, as shown in Figure 6C. This approach enabled   sensing units, significantly enhances detection efficiency
            the fabrication of a multichannel C-reactive protein   and  supports  personalized  diabetes  management.
            detection system while maintaining material integrity   Simultaneously, extrusion-based 3D printing has achieved
            under high-energy laser exposure, thus offering a robust   key breakthroughs in multifunctional sensor integration
            manufacturing route for point-of-care diagnostic devices.  due to its superior material compatibility. Marzo et al.
                                                                                                            174








































            Figure 6. Applications of three-dimensional (3D) printing in biosensor construction. (A) Fabrication of a flexible strain sensor. Process schematic of a
            flexible strain sensor with embedded multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite microchannel (MWCNT) network. Adapted with permission from Wang
               170
            et al.  (B) Laser direct writing for flexible ammonia gas sensor. (a) Schematic of the laser direct writing process. (b) Photograph of a flexible zigzag sensor
            pattern fabricated via laser writing. (c) Real-time response/recovery curves to ammonia concentrations from 75 to 400 ppm. Adapted with permission
                     171
            from Wu et al.  (C) Blister-actuated laser-induced forward transfer printing for multifunctional paper biosensors. (a) Overview of the printing setup
            with typewriter-like receiver movement. (b) Key parameters and stroboscopic imaging of droplet formation at 2.5 μJ. Scale bar: 100 µm. (c) Prototype
            of a multichannel lateral flow test fabricated entirely by laser printing. Adapted with permission from Hecht et al.  (D) 3D-printed glucose sensor
                                                                                       172
            and cell-culture assay. (a) Fabrication of carbon black (CB)-polylactic acid (PLA) working electrode and surface coating protocol. (b) Assembly of the
            PLA chip platform onto glass using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). (c) Bioprinted sinusoid-mimetic hydrogel (alginate-collagen). Scale bar: 4.5 mm. (d)
            Chronoamperometric response of the CB-PLA electrode to glucose (1–100 mM). (e) Glucose measurement in 3D-cultured cells on Day 2. Adapted with
                            175
            permission from Lee et al.  Copyright © 2023 Wiley-VCH. (E) Electrochemical biosensor for α2-macroglobulin. (a) Schematic of sensor fabrication and
            anti-α2-macroglobulin modification and detection. (b) Magnetization hysteresis loops for α2-macroglobulin at 10 ng/mL–100 μg/mL. (c) Specificity assay
            against potential interferents. Adapted with permission from Guo et al. 176
            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       113                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025210209
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126