Page 310 - v11i4
P. 310

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 3D scaffold prevents tendon ossification




            and SF–HPC bioinks gradually decreased with increasing   HPC into SF enhanced cross-linking and promoted a more
            shear rate, indicating favorable shear-thinning behavior.   stable network within the bioink. In conclusion, excellent
            Shear-thinning capability is one of the core requirements   rheological properties are crucial for successful extrusion-
            for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting.  At the high shear rate   based 3D bioprinting, as they directly affect the bioinks’
                                        41
            near the printer nozzle, viscosity decreased significantly,   extrusion controllability, structural fidelity, cell viability,
            enabling the bioinks to pass through the micro-nozzle   and ultimately the functionality of engineered tissues. 43
            with low resistance, thereby preventing nozzle clogging
            due to high viscosity. Upon exiting the nozzle, the shear   3.2. Three-dimensional bioprinting of tissue-
            rate abruptly dropped, and viscosity rapidly recovered,   engineered Achilles tendon scaffolds and
            enhancing scaffold shape stability and preventing structural   bending tests
            collapse  or  deformation.  Equally  important,  when   Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting was employed to
            using cell-laden bioinks for 3D printing, shear-thinning   fabricate tissue-engineered Achilles tendon scaffolds with
            properties enable smooth extrusion under lower printing   dimensions of 2 mm × 3 mm × 15 mm (Figure 2A–C).
            pressure, reducing cell membranes or extracellular matrix   During the printing process, the bioink extruded smoothly
            damage caused by high shear stress and improving cell   from  the  nozzle  without  clogging.  The  printed  scaffolds
            viability.  Following extrusion, rapid viscosity recovery   maintained  structural  integrity  with  no  observable
                   42
            immobilizes cells, preventing gravity or flow-induced   deformation or collapse, demonstrating excellent printing
            migration during the molding stage and ensuring uniform   fidelity. Bending tests revealed that the scaffolds could be
                                                               bent to 180° without fracture and fully recovered to their
            cell distribution within the printed structure.
                                                               original shape after unloading (Figure 2D1–D3). SF–HPC
               The frequency–modulus curve (Figure 1B) showed that   scaffolds showed no fracture during bending, indicating
            the G’ and G’’ of both SF and SF–HPC bioinks remained   superior toughness and ductility. Complete shape recovery
            relatively stable with increasing frequency. Notably, the G’   after bending further confirmed their appropriate elastic
            of both bioinks exceeded their respective G’’, indicating   modulus. Previous studies have demonstrated that scaffold
            that both formulations exhibited stable gel-like behavior.   toughness, ductility, and elastic modulus are critical factors
            Furthermore, the G’ of SF–HPC bioinks was higher than   for tendon injury repair.  Specifically, the Achilles tendon
                                                                                  44
            that of SF bioinks, suggesting that the incorporation of   undergoes significant tension during physical activities



































            Figure 2. Fabrication and bending test of 3D bioprinted tissue-engineered Achilles tendon scaffolds. (A) Digital design model prior to bioprinting. (B) 3D
            bioprinting process. (C) Macroscopic view of the printed scaffold. (D1–D3) Sequential bending test demonstrating elastic recovery (180° bending angle)
            and preserved structural integrity (no fractures observed). Abbreviation: 3D, three-dimensional.


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       302                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025210203
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315