Page 363 - v11i4
P. 363

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Sr-doped printed scaffolds for bone repair



            Table 1. Specific primers for immunoregulatory and osteogenesis-related genes

                                                            Primer sequence (5’–3’)
             Gene
                                              Forward                                  Reverse
             TNF-α                     GGGTGTTCATCCATTCTC                       GGTCACTGTCCCAGCAT
             IL1β                     TACAGGCTCCGAGATGAACA                    AGGCCACAGGTATTTTGTCG
             ARG                      CATATCTGCCAAAGACATCG                     GGTCTCTTCCATCACCTTGC
             CD206                   ATGGATGTTGATGGCTACTGG                    TTCTGACTCTGGACACTTGC
             ALP                      GGAGATGGTATGGGCGTCTC                    GGACCTGAGCGTTGGTGTTA
             RUNX2                   GCCGGGAATGATGAGAACTA                     GGACCGTCCACTGTCACTTT
             COL1                    CGCTGGCAAGAATGGCGATC                     ATGCCTCTGTCACCTTGTTCG
             GAPDH                 TGAACTAACACAGAGGAGGATCAG                   GCTTAGGGCATGAGCTTGAC


            quality controls (QCs), and samples, were equilibrated   the skull of SD rats was established. The scaffolds were
            to room temperature before use. Working solutions were   cylindrical (diameter: 5 mm; height: 1 mm) and were
            prepared as instructed by the kit. The required number of   irradiated and sterilized (10 kGy) before implantation.
            ELISA strips was removed from the aluminum foil pouch,   The  animal  experimental  study  was  approved  by  the
            while the remaining strips were resealed in a self-sealing   Animal Ethics Committee of Zunyi Medical University
            bag and stored at 4°C. Wells were designated for standards,   (approval no. ZMU21-2412-019). The animal model was
            0 value, blanks, and samples. Each standard received 50
            μL of standards at different concentrations, 0 value wells   established with 36 SD rats (280–320 g), kept under the
            received 50 μL of sample diluent, blank wells were left   same conditions. The rats were randomly distributed into
            empty,  and  sample wells received 50 μL of  test samples.   the blank, P, SBP, and PSBP groups, respectively. Bone
            Then, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled   regeneration was assessed using a bilateral critical-sized
            detection antibody was added to all standard, 0 value, and   cranial defect model (5  mm diameter), with the defect
            sample wells. Plates were sealed and incubated at 37°C for   area in the cranial bone measuring approximately 5 mm
            60 min in a water bath or thermostat. After incubation, the   in diameter and 2 mm in height. Scaffolds from the three
            sealing film was removed, the liquid was discarded, and the   groups—P, SBP, and PSBP—were implanted into the defect
            plate was gently blotted dry with absorbent paper. Each well   sites, and the scalp was sutured.
            was then filled with washing solution and allowed to stand   The animal model was developed as described herein.
            for 20 s. The reaction plate was then shaken with washing   SD rats were weighed and anesthetized. The surgical area
            solution,  and  the  plate  was  patted  dry  with  absorbent   of the skull was shaved, the animals were fixed in the prone
            paper; this process was repeated five times. If an automatic   position, disinfected with 1% iodophor, and covered with
            plate washer was used, the plate was washed according to   sterile sheets. A midline incision approximately 2 cm
            the manufacturer’s instructions, with a 30-s programmed   in length was made along the cranial vault, and the
            soak included to improve assay precision. After the final   subcutaneous tissue was separated using the handle of
            wash, the plate was thoroughly blotted dry on clean, non-  a scalpel. The periosteum was neatly incised along the
            abrasive paper. Substrate solutions A and B were mixed in   sagittal suture of the skull, and the subperiosteal tissues
            a 1:1 volume ratio, and 100 μL of the mixture was added to   were carefully peeled off with the handle of the scalpel, fully
            each well. The plate was then covered with sealing film and   exposing the parietal, occipital, and part of the frontal bone
            incubated in the dark at 37°C for 15 min in a water bath or   bilaterally. A 5-mm diameter round full-layer bone defect
            thermostat. After incubation, 50 μL of stop solution was   was created on both sides of the parietal midline of the rat
            added to each well, and the absorbance (OD) of each well   skull using a low-speed hollow ring drill (1400–1500 rpm),
            was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader.  taking care to avoid damaging the dura mater. At the start
            2.5. In vivo assessment of osteogenic performance   of drilling, gentle manual pressure was applied to initiate
            of scaffolds                                       cranial penetration, which was reduced near completion
                                                               to prevent injury to the underlying dura and blood vessels.
            2.5.1. Establishment of rat cranial defect model   The drill was then tilted at an angle of 20°–30° in forward,
            In order to test the bone reparative ability of the scaffold   backward, left, and right directions without additional
            material  in vivo, a model of bilateral bone defects in   external force, allowing gravity to facilitate intermittent


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       355                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025210211
   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368