Page 365 - v11i4
P. 365

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Sr-doped printed scaffolds for bone repair




            further washing, the slices were drained and directly stained   ± standard deviation, and comparisons between groups
            in 1% hydrochloric acid in alcohol for 2–30 s. After rinsing,   were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of
            the sections were further differentiated with 1% acetic acid   variance (ANOVA) and independent samples  t-tests.
            and dehydrated in two tanks of anhydrous ethanol (75%   Graphs were plotted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad
            and 95%). For sealing, the sections were immersed in a   Software, America) and Origin software (Beijing Tianyan
            third vat of anhydrous ethanol (99%) for 5 min, xylene   Rongzhi Software Co., Ltd, China). Statistically significant
            for 5 min for transparency, and sealed with neutral gum.   differences are indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and
            Collagen fibers appeared blue, while myofibrils, fibrin, and   ***p < 0.001.
            erythrocytes were stained red under a light microscope.
                                                               3. Results
            2.5.6. Micro-computed tomography
            Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis was   3.1. Scaffold preparation and characterization
            performed using a ZKKS-MCT-Sharp scanner (Zhong    3.1.1. Characterization of SrBG
            Ke Kai Sheng, China). Cranial specimens from each   The microscopic morphology of SrBG was characterized
            group at 1-, 2-, and 3-months post-operation were fixed   using SEM. The SrBG prepared consisted of many
            in the scanner along the long axis. Scanning parameters   regular stacks of small particles with well-dispersed glass
            were set as follows: voltage at 70 kV, power at 7 W, four-  particles arranged in clusters (Figure 3A). DLS analysis
            frame superimposition, an angular gain of 0.72°, and an   (Figure 3B) revealed that the SrBG particle size distribution
            exposure time of 100 ms. Each sample was rotated 360°   was 350–700 nm, with the most prevalent size being 493.9
            to complete the scan. The scanned images were denoised   nm, accounting for about 38% of the total distribution.
            and reconstructed to obtain 3D images. Bone repair and
            bone growth in the cranial defects of rats were observed;   3.1.2. Characterization and physicochemical
            the bone volume fraction of the newborn bone in the   properties of P, SBP, and PSBP scaffolds
            cranial defects of rats was calculated using a Bruker high-  The  surface  morphology of  the  composite scaffolds
            resolution micro CT (CTAn). Finally, the cranial micro-  (P, SBP, and PSBP) is presented in Figure 4A. Compared
            CT data of rats from different subgroups were statistically   to the P scaffolds, the pore size of the SBP scaffolds did not
            analyzed to compare the differences.               change significantly, and the surface became roughened
                                                               by the addition of SrBG. The surface of the SBP scaffolds
            2.5.7. Immunofluorescence staining
            The SD rats were euthanized at postoperative months 1, 2,   had SrBG particles attached, but the pores on the surface
            and 3, and the cranial tissues were removed and fixed in   became smaller, and the number of pores decreased. After
            4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h. The cranial specimens were   the addition of PDA to the SBP scaffolds, there was no
            then placed in a 10% EDTA demineralization solution for   significant change in the pore size of the scaffolds, but
            decalcification. To determine the new bone formation,   the number of pores was further reduced, mainly because
            hematoxylin and  eosin  (HE)  staining,  Masson  staining,   the PDA coating covered the original pores. At higher
            and immunofluorescence staining were performed on   magnification (× 2000), the surface of PSBP scaffolds was
            the sections of each sample. Sections with 5 μm thickness   smoother compared to the SBP scaffolds, and SrBG particle
            were cut from paraffin-embedded tissues for histological   attachment was observed on the surface of PSBP scaffolds.
            assessment. These sections were immersed in 3% (w/v)   The porosity of the P, SBP, and PSBP scaffolds was 68.29
            H O  and blocked with 3% (v/v) Bull serum albumin (BSA)   ± 5.62%, 65.00 ± 2.62%, and 60.53 ± 2.87%, respectively
             2
               2
            solution. After enzymatic antigen repair, the sections were   (Figure 4C). The porosity of the PSBP scaffold was
            again incubated with the following primary antibodies:   slightly lower than that of the P and SBP scaffolds, but the
            BMP-2 (rat, 1:100 dilution; Abcam, USA); VEGF (rat,   difference was not significant, consistent with the results of
            1:200 dilution; Abcam, USA); CD163 (rat, 1:100 dilution;   SEM. The contact angles of the scaffolds in each group were
            Abcam, USA); and iNOS (rat, 1:2000 dilution; Abcam,   examined by the static contact angle method (Figure 4B1);
            USA). After rinsing twice with PBS, the samples were   the contact angles of the P, SBP, and PSBP scaffolds were
            incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-  99.01 ± 2.62°, 72.04 ± 2.27°, and 0°, respectively (Figure 4B2).
            labeled secondary antibodies and then visualized by   Generally, a smaller contact angle would indicate a more
            staining with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Cell   hydrophilic material. Overall, the addition of PDA and
            nuclei were stained with hematoxylin.              SrBG significantly improved the hydrophilicity of PCL
                                                               materials, and the PSBP scaffolds had better hydrophilicity
            2.6. Statistical analysis                          compared to the P and SBP scaffolds. The SBP and PSBP
            Data were processed using SPSS 29.0 software (IBM,   scaffolds were immersed in PBS, and the release of Sr²  was
                                                                                                         +
            China). The experimental data were expressed as mean   measured on days 1 and 3. The SBP and PSBP scaffolds

            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       357                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025210211
   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370