Page 154 - IJOCTA-15-1
P. 154

N. Tekbıyık-Ersoy / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.1, pp.137-154 (2025)
            5.3. Case 3 results                               than 10% implies an excellent forecasting. Hence,
                                                              it can be said that the forecasting performances
            Case 3 includes four modeling parameters, in-     of the developed models are excellent. As also
            dicated with N:4 in Figure 4.    The minimum
            and mean MAE of 210 optimization simula-          seen from the results, MAEOPT performed bet-
                                                              ter than MLR in almost all the cases, based on
            tions/regression estimations are also shown on the
                                                              MAE and MAPE. Moreover, the forecasting per-
            figure. Obviously, the average MAE dropped even
                                                              formances of the models developed for Case 3, are
            further reaching around 1054.46 for MAEOPT.
                                                              superior to the ones in Case 1 and Case 2, in terms
            C: 146 of 210 indicates that the minimum MAE
            has been reached in 146 th  combination. As seen  of MAE and MAPE. That means although all six
                                             rd
            from the figure, combination of 3 , 4 th  and 6 th  models are successful, the best model to be used
            and 7 th  parameters resulted in the lowest MAE.  for modeling and forecasting T¨urkiye’s renewable
                                                              energy capacity in the future is the one provided
            This indicates that the model corresponding to
                                                              in equation (8) with the values in Table 7.
            combination 146 for MAEOPT is the best model
            among all the models developed in this paper (750  6. Conclusion
            models), and it has an excellent performance. Re-
                                 rd
            ferring to Section 4, 3 , 4 th  and 6 th  and 7 th  pa-  Considering that the effects of global warming and
            rameters are Total population, Urban population   climate change have become more evident in the
            (% of total population), Net energy imports (PJ),  last decade, the importance of renewables has in-
            and Coal imports (TJ) respectively. Considering   creased significantly. Many countries around the
            all the factors mentioned above, the best models  world are investing in renewables, and trying to
            for MLR and MAEOPT can be written as follows:     integrate more renewable energy into their energy
                                                              mix, in order to reduce their carbon footprint. Es-
                 ˆ y i = b 1 x 1i + b 2 x 2i + b 3 x 3i + b 4 x 4i + b 0  (8)
                                                              pecially in the last two decades, T¨urkiye followed
             where ˆy i represents the installed RE capacity in  a similar trend and increased the amount and the
            year i (in MW) and b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 , b 0 are as shown  capacity of renewable energy installations in the
            in Table 8. x 1i ,x 2i , x 3i and x 4i represent the Total  country. This paper investigated the reasons be-
            population, Urban population (% of total popula-  hind this rapid development. The study focused
            tion), Net energy imports (PJ), and Coal imports  on three cases, and in each case, the number of
            (TJ) in the i th  year, respectively.             modeling parameters have been increased. This
                                                              helped in understanding the importance and pri-
                                                              ority of the modeling parameters, mainly the most
            5.4. Prediction performance of the
                                                              important factors affecting the renewable energy
                 developed models
                                                              development in T¨urkiye. The study performed in
            Figures 5-7 show the prediction/estimation per-   this paper revealed that the most important fac-
            formances of the best models in each case. As     tors affecting renewable energy installations are
            seen from the figures, all six models are suc-    the Total population and the Urban population
            cessful in predicting the installed RE capacity in  (% of the total population). The other important
            T¨urkiye during the modeling period. After that,  factors were recorded to be Net energy imports
            some deviations are observed in terms of perfor-  (PJ) and Coal imports (TJ) respectively. This
            mance. In order to better compare the forecasting  indicates that the energy import dependency in
            performance of all these six models, their MAE,   T¨urkiye has a potential impact in the future of
            MAPE and RMSE values are also compared dur-       RE development. The results also reveal that the
            ing the whole prediction/forecasting period (in-  need for importing coal (one of the main sources
            cluding the 15 years modeling period and the 2    of electricity generation in T¨urkiye) also drives
            years testing period). The results can be seen in  the country’s installed RE capacity. It is clear
            Tables 9-11.                                      that T¨urkiye is trying to decrease its energy de-
                                                              pendency by utilizing more renewables. Hence, in
                                                              order to increase the utilization of RE in T¨urkiye
            Based on the results provided in Tables 9-11, as  and thus the energy dependency, the link between
            expected, the MAE, MAPE and RMSE values of        imports and renewable energy should be investi-
            the best models found by MLR and MAEOPT           gated in more detail.
            have increased when the whole forecasting period  The simulation results have shown that the per-
            is considered (2005-2021). However, despite this  formances of all the best models presented in this
            increase, the MAPE values of all six models (one  paper (6 models: 3 for MLR and 3 for MAEOPT)
            for MLR and one for MAEOPT for each case)         are excellent for the forecasting period, due to the
            are less than 5%. According to, 30  MAPE of less  MAPE’s being between %3.3107-%4.0963.
                                                           148
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159