Page 152 - IJOCTA-15-1

N. Tekbıyık-Ersoy / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.1, pp.137-154 (2025)

MLR (N: 2) / C: 18 of 45 / C : [3 4] / Min: 807.3196 / Mean: 1901.0838
B
MAEOPT (N: 2) / C: 18 of 45 / C : [3 4] / Min: 771.4631 / Mean: 1806.9513
B
4000
MLR:MAE
MLR: MeanMAE
3500
MAEOPT:MAE
MAEOPT: MeanMAE
3000

2500
MW
2000

1500

1000

500
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Combinations

Figure 2. MAE Results for Case 1

Table 3. b 1 , b 2 and b 0 for MLR and MAEOPT in Case 1

Method b 1 b 2 b 0
MLR 0.00799082 -10006.74459441 142610.15814996
MAEOPT 0.00810932 -10219.38669067 149159.82875932

Table 4. MAE, MAPE and RMSE Comparison of MLR and MAEOPT for Case 1

Criteria MLR MAEOPT % Reduction
MAE of C B 807.3196 771.4631 4.44
MAPE of C B 3.8463 3.6677 4.64
RMSE of C B 983.5515 1001.6491 -1.84

Table 5. b 1 , b 2 , b 3 and b 0 for MLR and MAEOPT in Case 2

Method b 1 b 2 b 3 b 0
MLR 0.00775423 -10376.06500433 5.05857714 176337.82370295
MAEOPT 0.00764803 -10382.03680718 5.83413543 183271.81682372

Table 6. MAE, MAPE and RMSE Comparison of MLR and MAEOPT for Case 2

Criteria MLR MAEOPT % Reduction
MAE of C B 645.0701 597.9554 7.30
MAPE of C B 3.4125 3.0964 9.26
RMSE of C B 802.4943 839.0062 -4.54

MAEOPT, from 1491.96 to 1369.15 respectively. values for the best combination for the modeling
This indicates a reduction of 8.23% in mean MAE period, are also provided in Table 6 for MLR and
of 120 combinations. MAE, MAPE and RMSE MAEOPT. As seen from the table, MAEOPT’s

146