Page 130 - IJPS-11-5
P. 130

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                     Regional disparities and fertility rates



            independent variables. In addition, it enables the   The SEM, unlike the SAR model, assumes the presence
            identification of variations over time (Hsiao, 2014; Lee   of spatial dependence in the error term rather than in the
            & Noh, 2012). Applying traditional econometric models   dependent variable. represents the spatial autocorrelation
            that do not consider spatial dependency or spatial   coefficient,  indicating  spatial  autocorrelation  among  the
            autocorrelation in regional studies may have a negative   error terms.
            impact on the efficiency of the analysis (LeSage & Pace,   y  = x  β + u
            2009). In contrast, spatial panel models address statistical   it  it  it
            issues that arise from spatial dependency (Anselin   u =α  + λ ∑ w u +ε                       (IV)
            et  al., 2008). In this study, various spatial panel models   it  i  ij  ij  jt  it
                                                                         ≠
            were  employed,  including  the  spatial  autoregressive   2
            model (SAR), the spatial error model (SEM), the spatial   ε  ~ N(0,σ )
                                                                it
            autoregressive confused model (SAC), and the spatial   The SAC model assumes spatial dependence in both
            Durbin model (SDM). These models incorporate random   the dependent variable and the error term. Therefore, in
            effects,  assuming  the  individual  and  time-specific   Equation V, both the spatial correlation of the dependent
            characteristics of the error term as random disturbances.  variable (ρ) and the spatial correlation of the error term (λ)
              To apply spatial econometric models, it is necessary to   are included:
            construct a spatial weight matrix that reflects interactions   y = ρ ∑ w y + x β + u
            among regions (Anselin et al., 2008; Elhorst, 2014; LeSage   it  ij  ij  jt  it  it
                                                                     ≠
            & Pace, 2009). A  spatial weight matrix assigns weights
            between regions based on physical distance, temporal   u =α i  + λ ∑ w u +ε it                (V)
                                                                it
                                                                             jt
                                                                           ij
            proximity, or traffic flow, indicating higher weights for   ij
                                                                         ≠
            stronger spatial dependencies. Among the various types,    2
            the most common are the adjacency matrix, which assigns   ε  ~ N(0,σ )
                                                                it
            weights based on geographic boundaries, and the inverse   Finally, the SDM assumes spatial dependence in both
            distance matrix, which assigns weights inversely proportional   the dependent variable and the explanatory variables. Here,
            to the distance between regions. In this study, various weight   x   represents  the  explanatory  variables  of  neighboring
                                                                jt
            matrices were applied; the model’s explanatory power   regions j for region i, and θ indicates the magnitude of the
            was highest when using the adjacency matrix. Unlike the   influence of neighboring regions’ characteristics on the
            inverse  distance  matrix,  which  assumes  that  all  regions   regional fertility rate. By employing the SDM, it is possible
            exert influence over one another based on distance, the   to incorporate the characteristics of the focal region
            adjacency matrix restricts interactions to geographically   while also assessing the influence of neighboring regions’
            neighboring regions, making it more suitable for capturing   characteristics. This facilitates a more comprehensive
            spatial dependence in this context. Moreover, the adjacency   examination of the complex determinants impacting
            matrix effectively reflects spatial autocorrelation. Therefore,   fertility rates, thereby enhancing the sophistication of the
            a Queen-type adjacency matrix was adopted as the spatial   analysis.
            weight matrix, providing a comprehensive representation of
            spatial relationships (Lee et al., 2006, p. 175).  y = ρ ∑ w y + x β + ∑ wx θ + u it
                                                                it
                                                                        ij
                                                                              it
                                                                                     ij
                                                                          jt
                                                                                       jt
                                                                     ≠
                                                                     ij           ij
                                                                                   ≠
              Equation III represents the SAR model, which assumes
            spatial lag in the dependent variable.  ρ represents the   u  = α  + ε it                     (VI)
                                                                    i
                                                                it
            spatial autocorrelation coefficient, indicating the spatial   ε  ~ N(0,σ )
                                                                       2
            autocorrelation among the dependent variables. In this   it
            equation,  y  represents the total fertility rate of region  i   2.2.3. Time series model
                     it
            in year t, w  represents the spatial weight of region j for   To analyze the impact of regional disparities resulting
                     ij
            region i, x  denotes the explanatory variables, β represents   from economic growth on the fertility rate, a time series
                    it
            the model’s estimated parameters, and indicates the error   model was employed as the primary methodology in this
            term. α  denotes the individual effect.            study. Time series models offer the advantage of providing
                  i
            y = ρ ∑ w y + x β + u it                           efficient estimates even when applied to small datasets
             it
                       jt
                     ij
                           it
                  ≠
                  ij                                           and can reveal long-term trends (Box & Jenkins, 1976;
                                                               Greenberg, 2001). These models have been widely used
            u  = α  + ε it                             (III)   in various fields of social science for both analytical and
                 i
             it
            ε  ~ N(0,σ )                                       predictive purposes. In this study, the time series model
                    2
             it
            Volume 11 Issue 5 (2025)                       124                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.8157
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135