Page 122 - ITPS-7-1
P. 122

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                            Repurposed Drugs as inhibitors of Pfmrk



            Lys26, Tyr96, and Lys100) within the residues of our   certain  regions  of  Africa,  where  both  children  and
            binding site. This is in contrast to our docking result,   pregnant women are primarily affected. The spread of this
            which indicated the formation of two H-bonds with Lys   deadly disease is influenced by local hygiene and overall
            26 and Glu18.                                      environmental conditions. Organizations like the WHO
                                                               and other leading research institutions continuously strive
            3.5. Secondary structure analysis                  to  improve  living  conditions  and bolster  our  ability to

            The comparative analysis of Dictionary of Protein   combat this disease [23-25] . There are two most important
            Secondary Structure (DSSP) secondary structures for both   strategies for controlling this condition: vector control,
            Pfmrk and the ligands was calculated using molecular   which is highly dependent on our living environment, and
            dynamics simulation and is summarized in Table S3. The   the development of medicine or vaccines. Although the
            secondary structure analysis of Pfmrk reveals similar   first vaccine developed for malaria, RTS, S, shows promise,
            content in terms of β-sheet, β-bridge, bend, turn, α-helix,   its impact on transmission remains limited, which, in turn,
            5-helix, and 3-helix when compared to the ligands. In   does not significantly affect endemicity [26,27] . The most
            addition, Alvesco and Donovex exhibit a broader range of   pressing  challenge in  managing  cases  of  malaria is  the
            secondary structures, encompassing coil, β-sheet, β-bridge,   increasing resistance to the current panel of drugs. Drug
            and bend. This observation suggests that these ligands have   resistance and cross-resistance among drug combinations
            maximum non-covalent interactions with Pfmrk. Orap   are prompting the scientific community to explore
            demonstrates a more significant turn content, signifying   alternatives beyond the current array of medications. The
                                                                                                           [23]
            its contribution to enhancing protein compactness relative   review by Pandey  et al. provides an updated account .
            to the other ligands.                              As a result, there is an urgent need to identify alternatives,
                                                               particularly in the most affected regions, including several
            3.6. MM-PBSA free energy analysis                  third-world countries. Therefore, a drug repurposing
            The total free binding energy for Donovex was determined   strategy could be an effective means to screen drugs and
            to be −92.87 ± 17.87 kJ/mol, while Lurasidone exhibited a   expedite the drug development process.
            slightly higher value of −105.9 ± 57.72 kJ/mol. These energy   This  in silico study aims to identify the potential
            values were notably higher than those of the other ligands,   FDA-approved drugs that could target the Pfmrk protein
            as indicated in Table 3. Donovex and Lurasidone emerged   kinase.  Through  the utilization of molecular  docking
            as the primary contributors to van der Waals forces,   and subsequent molecular dynamics simulations, we
            underscoring the significance of hydrophobic interactions   focused on gaining insight into the binding interactions
            in our protein-ligand interactions. In addition, these two   between these screened drugs and Pfmrk’s ATP binding
            ligands  were  observed  to  exert  a  notable  influence  on   site. Our approach particularly focused on the unique
            promoting a more folded state of Pfmrk. Their strong   characteristics of the active site, marked by the presence
            binding affinity was evident through their ability to bind   of critical residues such as Leu16, Met75, Met91, Ile93,
            to the protein’s active site and other binding regions with   and Phe143. Our findings highlighted the critical role
            relatively higher binding affinity, as reflected in their   of H-bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and other non-
            considerably low binding energy values.            covalent interactions in establishing robust ligand-protein
                                                               binding.
            4. Discussion
                                                                 Given Pfmrk’s dual function in both  P. falciparum
            Malaria remains one of the most dreaded public health   cellular replication and its overall life cycle, targeting ATP
            concerns,  exerting  a  significant  global  impact.  One  of   binding has emerged as a potential strategy to inhibit its
            the  world’s  most  affected  regions  by  malaria  includes   kinase  activity. Through  rigorous  analysis, we  identified
            Table 3. Comprehensive comparative analysis of energetic components in protein‑drug complexes formed post‑simulation

            Ligands         van der Waal      Electrostatic      Energy of        SASA energy     Binding energy
                           energy (kJ/mol)   energy (kJ/mol)  solvation (kJ/mol)   (kJ/mol)         (kJ/mol)
            Alvesco        −121.789±69.283    −1.518±7.973      65.713±46.072     −13.350±7.725   −70.944±54.776
            Donovex        −126.353±20.061    −2.796±2.679      51.327±15.995     −15.054±2.503   −92.877±17.872
            Lurasidone     −127.589±64.217    −7.726±7.060      40.816±23.777     −11.408±5.727   −105.907±57.728
            Orap          −103.655±100.467    −3.910±6.977      42.897±56.765     −9.701±9.853    −74.369±75.259
            Vorapaxar      −5.003±28.557      −0.642±4.782      16.218±40.884     −0.269±4.157     10.304±41.271
            Abbreviation: SASA: Solvent-accessible surface area.


            Volume 7 Issue 1 (2024)                         7                         https://doi.org/10.36922/itps.1313
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127