Page 50 - JCTR-10-2
P. 50

144                       Grondin et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(2): 141-150
        Table 2. Psychological assessments of patients with CIR versus other   Table 2. (Continued)
        diseases                                                 Psychological       CIR (n=47)     Other      P‑value
        Psychological       CIR (n=47)     Other      P‑value    parameters                        diseases
        parameters                         diseases                                                 (n=12)
                                           (n=12)                Somatic escalade     14 (29.8%)   7 (58.3%)    0.093
        Depression           38 (80.9%)   11 (91.7%)   0.67      Actual stress level                             1
        Depression intensity                            0.4       Mild/moderate       44 (93.6%)   12 (100%)
         Mild/moderate       32 (84.2%)   8 (72.7%)               Severe               3 (6.4%)     0 (0%)
         Severe              6 (15.8%)    3 (27.3%)              Professional impact                            0.064
        Previous depression  37 (78.7%)   11 (91.7%)   0.431      Mild/moderate       22 (50%)     7 (87.5%)
        Anxiety              47 (100%)    12 (100%)     NA        Severe              22 (50%)     1 (12.5%)
        Anxiety intensity                              0.174     Manual labor         28 (59.6%)   2 (16.7%)   0.008*
         Mild/moderate       21 (44.7%)   8 (66.7%)              Physical activity    23 (48.9%)   2 (16.7%)   0.043*
         Severe              26 (55.3%)   4 (33.3%)              enjoyment pre-diagnosis
         Alexithymia         46 (97.9%)   11 (91.7%)   0.368     Physical activity     8 (17%)     1 (8.3%)     0.67
        Alexithymia intensity                           1        enjoyment post-diagnosis
         Mild/moderate       20 (43.5%)   5 (45.5%)              Note: Data are expressed as n (%) and compared using the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s
                                                                 exact test accordingly; *P<0.05.
         Severe              26 (56.5%)   6 (54.5%)              Abbreviations: NA: Not applicable; CIR: Chronic inflammatory rheumatism.
        Social desirability                            0.431
         Mild/moderate       37 (78.7%)   11 (91.7%)               Temoshok  [13]  previously  described  the  personality  profile
         Severe              10 (21.3%)    1 (8.3%)             of RA patients as type C, characterized by submissive behavior,
        Emotional repression                          0.019*    conciliatory approach, repression of hostility, self-effacement of
         Mild/moderate       25 (53.2%)   11 (91.7%)            personal needs, and depressive vulnerability. Grossarth-Maticek
         Severe              22 (46.8%)    1 (8.3%)             et  al.  [14,15]  made  similar  observations  in  cancer  patients.
        Conflict-management                            0.716    Bayle et al. [16] devised a psychological vulnerability score and
        style                                                   obtained converging results close to the type C personality, and
         Avoidance           37 (78.7%)    9 (75%)              the scores were significantly higher for patients with secondary
         Intermediate        10 (21.3%)    3 (25%)              Raynaud’s  syndrome  than  a  control  group  with  idiopathic  or
        Tendency to cede responsibility to others      0.501    primary Raynaud’s syndrome.
         Mild/moderate       45 (95.7%)   11 (91.7%)               Nagano et al. [17] demonstrated that rational and anti-emotional
         Severe               2 (4.3%)     1 (8.3%)             behaviors by RA patients, characterized by an extreme tendency to
        Persecution complex  14 (29.8%)    1 (8.3%)    0.16     squelch emotional behaviors and rationalize negative experiences,
        Somatic complaints                             0.01*    were associated with poorer prognoses. Ishii et al. [18] found that
         Mild/moderate       32 (68.1%)    3 (25%)              RA patients, who were easily brought to tears in response to stress,
         Severe              15 (31.9%)    9 (75%)              had better responses to treatment and better overall prognoses.
                                                                   Collectively, previous studies and our present findings highlight
        Psychological complaints                      0.002*    the importance of emotional dysregulation, especially emotional
         Mild/moderate       33 (70.2%)   2 (16.7%)             repression, on CIR etiology and prognosis. However, the present
         Severe              14 (29.8%)   10 (83.3%)            study should not be generalized as biased toward CIR or propose
        Emotional expressivity                          1       a secondary coping strategy for CIR. Emotional repression has
        intensity                                               also been considered a consequence of the CIR diagnosis instead
         Mild/moderate       32 (68.1%)   8 (66.7%)             of CIR itself [19,20].
         Severe              15 (31.9%)   4 (33.3%)                The intensity of key early life events was significantly more
        Life event 1         29 (65.9%)   8 (72.7%)     1       severe for CIR patients than for those with other diseases. Cutolo
        Life event 1 intensity                        0.015*    and  Straub  [21,22]  reported  that  stressful  events  preceded  RA
         Mild/moderate       15 (51.7%)   8 (100%)              onset for 86% of their patients.
         Severe              14 (48.3%)    0 (0%)                  Several  studies  have  associated  severe  life  events  with  CIR
        Life event 2         44 (93.6%)   11 (91.7%)    1       onset or flares, whereas other studies have associated CIR with
        Life event 2 intensity                          1       minor  life  events  and  daily  stress.  In  contrast,  we  found  no
         Mild/moderate       30 (68.2%)   8 (72.7%)             significant  difference  in  the  actual  stress  level  presented  by
         Severe              14 (31.8%)   3 (27.3%)             CIR and other diseases, probably because of a lack of statistical
        Heavy conflictual load   40 (85.1%)  9 (75.0%)  0.409   power. Rimón and Laasko [23] described that higher stress at RA
        over the last 3 years                                   onset predicted a poorer prognosis for the disease. O’Donovan
                                                     (Cont’d...)  et al.  [24] also found that  veterans experiencing  trauma  and

                                                DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.23.00099
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55