Page 48 - JCTR-10-2
P. 48

142                       Grondin et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(2): 141-150
        with better  precision [5].  Likewise,  psychological  support  is   2.2. Psychological assessment tools
        increasingly integrated into the management of patients with CIR
        as they are more prone to mental and overall health disorders.  An experienced  psychiatrist  collected  information  during a
          Emotional  repression  refers  to  the  tendency  to  inhibit  the   semi-structured,  semi-directed  interview  lasting  1.5  –  2  h. The
        expression of negative feelings and/or unpleasant thoughts and is   psychological parameters assessed were (i) depressive symptoms
        a common manifestation in CIR patients. Hence, an assessment   and their severity (based on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression
        of the patients’ emotional profile could provide a more relevant   Rating  Scale)  [6];  (ii)  history  of  major  depression  episodes;
        and  effective  approach  to  managing  emotional  repression  and   (iii)  anxiety  symptoms  using  a  21-question  multiple-choice
        treating  CIR.  In  this  regard,  we  hypothesized  that  a  particular   self-report  inventory  (i.e.,  the  Beck  Anxiety  Inventory)  [7];
        psychological  profile,  namely,  emotional  repression,  could  be   (iv) alexithymia, a behavioral trait of individuals who are unable
        associated with autoimmune deregulation.                to  identify  and  describe  their  interior  feelings,  have  limited
          Herein,  this  preliminary  and  exploratory  study  primarily   imaginative capacity, and tend to focus their thoughts externally
        investigated the emotional function of CIR patients by assessing   rather than resorting to introspection [8,9], and its severity using
        their  psychological  profiles  to  explore  a  possible  association   the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale [10]; (v) social desirability
        between  autoimmunity  and  emotional  regulation.  In  addition,   intensity, that is, the tendency to seek approval of others and preserve
        we  further  evaluated  the  emotional  profiles  for  potential   one’s self-image, using the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability
        associations  with  other  conditions  (i.e.,  rheumatoid  arthritis   scale (MCSD), a 33-item self-report questionnaire [11]; (vi) the
        [RA] and spondyloarthritis [SpA]) and different rheumatological   severity of emotional repression, that is, the tendency to inhibit
        characteristics (i.e., biological inflammatory syndrome, sacroiliitis,   the  expression  of  negative  feelings  or  disagreeable  thoughts,
        structural involvement (i.e., osteoarticular destruction of the joint   in  accordance  with  the  Weinberger  classification;  and  (vii)  the
        due  to  the  inflammatory  activity  of  rheumatism),  and  positive   combination  of  State-Trait Anxiety  Inventory  (STAI)  [12] and
        rheumatoid  factor  [RF],  anti-citrullinated  peptide  antibody   MCSD as emotionally repressed individuals typically have a low
        [ACPA], and human leukocyte antigen [HLA]-B27 allele).  STAI score and high MCSD.
                                                                   The psychiatrist used a Likert-type scale to assess the severity
        2. Methods                                              of the psychological parameters in a specific questionnaire, which
                                                                assessed (i) the severity of somatic and psychological complaints
        2.1. Population and study design                        (i.e., severe complaints referred to personalized responses to most
          This  monocentric  cross-sectional  observational  pilot  study   of the questions); (ii) emotional-expressivity intensity (i.e., graded
        was conducted  in the rheumatology  department  of a university   as  “mild”  when  the  patient  had  several  emotional  moments
        hospital. During a routine follow-up, the CIR patients were offered   without excessive reactions, “moderate” when the patient’s facial
        an evaluation based on the global CIR management framework,   expressions  were  accompanied  by  fluctuating  emotions  as  the
        which  included  dermatological,  dental,  and  gynecological   discussion progressed, or “severe” when the patient had a tendency
        consultations,  as  well  as  rheumatologist-requested  psychiatric   for hyper-expressivity throughout the interview); (iii) life events
        assessments  (anxiety  disorders,  depressive  disorders,  sleep   (i.e., type 1 for events occurring before 15 years old and type 2
        disorders,  conjugal  violence,  and  childhood  traumas).  None  of   for events occurring within 3 years preceding the rheumatological
        the recruited 59 patients refused to participate in the evaluation.   disease onset) and their intensities (i.e., classified as “mild” when
        The exclusion criteria were: age <18 or >65 years old, cognitive   stressful  events  were  non-existent  or  mild,  “moderate”  when
        disorders,  substance  dependence,  or  acute  somatic  or  any   stressful  events  did  not  incur  traumatic  stress  [e.g.,  emotional
        psychiatric disorders requiring emergency hospitalization.  deprivation  concerning  socio-economic  difficulties,  severe  or
          The  participating  patients  were  accompanied  to  the   disabling  diseases  of  close  friends/relatives],  or  “severe”  for  a
        rheumatology  department  by  seven  different  rheumatologists.   traumatic event [e.g., sudden death of a person caring for a child,
        CIR  patients  were  classified  as  having  RA  (based  on  the  2010   physical or sexual assault, patient witnessed a death, or thought
        classification by the American College of Rheumatology/European   he/she would die]); (iv) somatic escalation (i.e., the occurrence of
        League Against  Rheumatism)  SpA  (based  on  the  2009  criteria   a series of several somatic disorders or another chronic pathology
        by  the  Assessment  of  SpA  International  Society),  or  psoriatic   before disease onset); (v) actual stress level; (vi) impact of the
        arthritis  (based  on  the  ClASsification  criteria  for  Psoriatic   rheumatological  disease  on  the  patient’s  professional  activities,
        ARthritis [CASPAR]). We identified 12 patients with ankylosing   corresponding  to  the  occupational  repercussions  experienced
        SpA  and  eight  with  psoriatic  arthritis,  and  these  patients  were   (i.e.,  classified  as  “mild”  for  minor  impact,  “moderate”  for
        categorized under SpA to facilitate statistical analyses. Although   notable  impact,  or  “severe”  for  a  painful  experience  [e.g.,  loss
        their clinical characteristics might differ slightly, their pathologies   of  professional  environment  and  activity,  feeling  of  injustice,
        share common pathophysiological  mechanisms and genetic   or  elevated  fear  of  losing  one’s  job]);  (vii)  manual  labor;  and
        backgrounds, such as the presence of HLA-B27.           (viii) physical activity enjoyment before and after disease onset.
          Non-CIR  patients  constituted  the  control  group,  and  these   For the different psychological parameters, we combined the
        patients  were in the rheumatology  department  for other   “mild”  and “moderate”  intensities  for comparison against  the
        rheumatological diseases.                               “severe” intensity. The mild-to-moderate psychological disorders
                                                DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.23.00099
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53